DC DC - Chandra Levy, 24, Washington DC, 1 May 2001 *found deceased in 2002*

  • #201
Hello Camper,

No, I don't thjnk we disagree so much. I was writing fast. I was not referring to you or rd as people who muddy the waters. You two are just the opposite, looking for the facts. I will try to look up the book you mention.

I don't especially like reading books on the computer either, but the ability to word search makes it worth it. Now some books talk. I don't have one of those yet, except the Bible.

benn8
 
  • #202
benn8 said:
>>Camper wrote:
-------------rd and Sprocket, where did you find the book to purchase?? I have not checked for quite a while and was not successful.<<

I have a copy of the paperback edition, Camper, but I still like the ebook edition the best. The ebook edition is only $6 at www.iUniverse.com, and rd says that it is a little cheaper at Amazon.com. The advantage of the ebook is that it is key word searchable. You can look up different subjects right away, and the search will take you to the exact pages.

I don't have one of those Palm computers that let you carry your ebook around with you, but even with a desktop the ebook is my first choice. Of course at $6 including shipping and handling, I guess that does not leave so much profit for the author, but maybe the ebook helps to spread the title around a little more anyway.



thanks, benn. I agree with both you and Camper. Having a book up on the screen is not nearly the experience of turning pages in a book in your hand, but it can't be beat for searching on details of this case. And at $5.40 to $6 it's a low cost way to look it over.

Due to no printing or shipping from printer to retailer costs, I make the same on an e-book as I do the printed book. I still have only recouped about a third so far of what it cost me to publish it. I'm just glad it's out there so people can read it and discuss it as we're doing here.

thanks!
rd
 
  • #203
Camper said:
Another suggestion rd, send one of your books to Dominick sp? Dunne!!!!!! In case they have missed something.
.


thanks, Camper. I notified Dunne's lawyer about the book as soon as I put it out last year. I haven't communicated with him, but my understanding is that he and his lawyers have access to it.

In my opinion, I think our work on the internet has helped. We will see as Condit backed out of answering questions last month by calling in sick and sending his kids out on a PR campaign to try to pressure Dominick to settle.

He is scheduled to answer more questions this month. We will see what happens. So far, every one of his answers I would think should be of interest to investigators whom he told different answers.

rd
 
  • #204
rd_jfc said:
thanks, Camper. I notified Dunne's lawyer about the book as soon as I put it out last year. I haven't communicated with him, but my understanding is that he and his lawyers have access to it.

In my opinion, I think our work on the internet has helped. We will see as Condit backed out of answering questions last month by calling in sick and sending his kids out on a PR campaign to try to pressure Dominick to settle.

He is scheduled to answer more questions this month. We will see what happens. So far, every one of his answers I would think should be of interest to investigators whom he told different answers.

rd








-------------->>>I am out the door again this evening for a play my grandson has a part in it.

There is another crime rd, that the publisher makes more money on your book than you do! I just may get the e book after I read the paper version.


.
 
  • #205
When is Condit due to "answer" more questions?
 
  • #206
Marine Mom said:
When is Condit due to "answer" more questions?
Isn't it today?
 
  • #207
That's what I thought I heard, but no mention of it anywhere. :waitasec:
 
  • #208
Today announced on a NEWS alert that Condit had settled with Dominic Dunne, for an undisclosed amount. Also that Dunne will apologize for his statements that were mis interpreted.
Huh?

Both suits that Condit has brought have settled out of court. The first suit, Condit refused to answer intimidating questions about Chandra. Today, it was just BEFORE he was to have answered intimidating questions about a romantic relationship with Chandra.

Now just how long can this hoax of a gentleman keep this little 'money making program working for him'.

I hope that rd is successful in bringing Mr. C's toes to the fire.


.
 
  • #209
Thanks for the update, Camper.

Unbelievable! And here I thought we were finally going to get some straight answers. Silly me.
 
  • #210
I am so sorry to hear about a settlement. I wonder if Vanity Fair's attorney's had anything to say about this, or if Dominick just wanted this OVER.

It will be interesting to read what Dom says in the next installment of his diary.

I read the book rd. It was great. Again, thanks for all the effort.
 
  • #211
I am now wondering if Dominic and his attorneys have taken their efforts underground, and will be the ones who nail him in the end.

We can only hope so.



.
 
  • #212
Camper said:
Both suits that Condit has brought have settled out of court. The first suit, Condit refused to answer intimidating questions about Chandra. Today, it was just BEFORE he was to have answered intimidating questions about a romantic relationship with Chandra.

.


Camper, the settlement with NE was also the exact same thing. I sent the NE lawyers Murder on a Horse Trail and told them there was no way they should have to settle with Condit, he has too many things unexplained to ask him in discovery.

The depositions went just like with Dunne's, in fact Dunne's lawyers would have checked that behavior and anticipated it. Condit keeps bluffing and backing out of questioning, but when he must sit down and answer questions under oath, he settles.

The National Enquirer lawyers described themselves as very pleased with the settlement. I hope Dunne is just as pleased

rd
 
  • #213
Sprocket said:
I am so sorry to hear about a settlement. I wonder if Vanity Fair's attorney's had anything to say about this, or if Dominick just wanted this OVER.

It will be interesting to read what Dom says in the next installment of his diary.

I read the book rd. It was great. Again, thanks for all the effort.


Great! I'm glad you liked it. I think Murder on a Horse Trail is true crime meets mystery novel with some political thriller undertones. Well, and maybe some travelogue too. :)

rd
 
  • #214
I just opened it and came on line. I have read Chapter one.

My suspicion never centered on the turtle hunter, I never read much about him, and did not know that he was never identified. Hmmm. My brain is doing little maneuvers now, do you think, no you couldn't could you, but I am thinking that maybe, just maybe he knew the dump spot before he went hunting for 'turtles'?

We were a big hunting family, but not for turtles. Do you sell turtles, did he sell turtles, did he just eat em, er just play withem, er just what was he gonna do with turtles if he found any, hmmm. Wonder what kinda smellin' dog he had?

Mr. C., continues to make himself look suspicious by NOT answering the hard questions and just grabbing whatever money he can and runnin'. What a major joke.

How many suits will he file, before the suiees, quit giving him 'any' money and their settlement is nothing but 'answers'.
 
  • #215
He's done, as in put a fork in it. At least as a plaintiff, that is.

Consider the strangeness of this turtle hunter finding Chandra's skull buried under leaves. Never identified. Found Chandra two days after Condit's staff started being questioned by a grand jury. Condit had already taken the Fifth after delaying the grand jury as long as he could.

The turtle hunter was referred to as both a man and a boy at different times. There was some speculation that he wasn't identified bacause he was a juvenile and, after all, hunting turtles.

And the police even were quoted anonymously as saying that hunting turtles in a national park is illegal, but hey, how do you think turtles get in pet shops? or something to that effect.

So he says that he's walking down the road, Broad Branch Road, and his dog bounds across the road and runs up the hill. He follows.

If anyone went to that scene, they would find that he had been walking along the side of a cliff, barely room to hug the cliff while the occasional car comes around curves at 60 miles per hour. When I walked it, a deer was lying there on the side of the road. You come around those curves at 60 miler per hour, anything in the road is going to get wasted.

The dog bounds across the road and up the hill, he says. The only problem is a four foot deep creek bed about twelve feet wide with a trickle of water. You don't bound across that. You can slide and scamper and climb, but you don't bound.

Then when you start climbing, you keep climbing. Up a sheer cliff on the other side. I did it, with a laptop over my shoulder. I couldn't have carried a person. Two people couldn't have carried a person at night up that sheer hill. And it's in broad view of Broad Branch. No, no one took Chandra up that hill.

So you climb up that steep, rocky, slippery, treacherous footing wall, amd you are on top of a cliff, looking down at the creek and road far below. Over to the side is another gully, even deeper and wider and harder to get across than the creek it runs down into. And across that gully was where Chandra was found.

Read the newspaper accounts from Allan Lengel and Michael Doyle quoting this young man, or quoting the police who questioned him, and try to reconcile the accidental discovery of Chandra's skull with following your dog who bounded through hill and dale, supposedly attracted by the scent of the skull, and ask yourself, why had no other dog noticed this for the entire previous year?

The turtle hunter is just one of many people who need to be questioned by the grand jury.

rd
 
  • #216
I ran across this and couldn't believe I didn't see it on the news! Sorry if its already been posted :)

SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Former Rep. Gary Condit has settled his $11 million defamation lawsuit against writer Dominick Dunne, accepting an undisclosed amount of money and an apology for claims the writer made about Condit's role in the disappearance of intern Chandra Levy.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7186089/
 
  • #217
chicoliving said:
I ran across this and couldn't believe I didn't see it on the news! Sorry if its already been posted :)

SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Former Rep. Gary Condit has settled his $11 million defamation lawsuit against writer Dominick Dunne, accepting an undisclosed amount of money and an apology for claims the writer made about Condit's role in the disappearance of intern Chandra Levy.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7186089/
I didn't want DD to settle. :( I thought he did nothing wrong. You would have to be totally oblivious if you didn't at least have some suspicions about Condit.
 
  • #218
nanandjim said:
I didn't want DD to settle. :( I thought he did nothing wrong. You would have to be totally oblivious if you didn't at least have some suspicions about Condit.


I didn't, either, but Nick Dunne is nearly 80 years old. He has the money easily to pay this &*^*% off and get it off his back, and maybe did it for stress reasons. He has to think about his health. Also, Condit probably wanted to settle b/c he didn't want to have to answer questions under oath.
 
  • #219
rd_jfc said:
He's done, as in put a fork in it. At least as a plaintiff, that is.

Consider the strangeness of this turtle hunter finding Chandra's skull buried under leaves. Never identified. Found Chandra two days after Condit's staff started being questioned by a grand jury. Condit had already taken the Fifth after delaying the grand jury as long as he could.

The turtle hunter was referred to as both a man and a boy at different times. There was some speculation that he wasn't identified bacause he was a juvenile and, after all, hunting turtles.

And the police even were quoted anonymously as saying that hunting turtles in a national park is illegal, but hey, how do you think turtles get in pet shops? or something to that effect.

So he says that he's walking down the road, Broad Branch Road, and his dog bounds across the road and runs up the hill. He follows.

If anyone went to that scene, they would find that he had been walking along the side of a cliff, barely room to hug the cliff while the occasional car comes around curves at 60 miles per hour. When I walked it, a deer was lying there on the side of the road. You come around those curves at 60 miler per hour, anything in the road is going to get wasted.

The dog bounds across the road and up the hill, he says. The only problem is a four foot deep creek bed about twelve feet wide with a trickle of water. You don't bound across that. You can slide and scamper and climb, but you don't bound.

Then when you start climbing, you keep climbing. Up a sheer cliff on the other side. I did it, with a laptop over my shoulder. I couldn't have carried a person. Two people couldn't have carried a person at night up that sheer hill. And it's in broad view of Broad Branch. No, no one took Chandra up that hill.

So you climb up that steep, rocky, slippery, treacherous footing wall, amd you are on top of a cliff, looking down at the creek and road far below. Over to the side is another gully, even deeper and wider and harder to get across than the creek it runs down into. And across that gully was where Chandra was found.

Read the newspaper accounts from Allan Lengel and Michael Doyle quoting this young man, or quoting the police who questioned him, and try to reconcile the accidental discovery of Chandra's skull with following your dog who bounded through hill and dale, supposedly attracted by the scent of the skull, and ask yourself, why had no other dog noticed this for the entire previous year?

The turtle hunter is just one of many people who need to be questioned by the grand jury.

rd





--------------->>>Wonder where the guy/boy/teen is now? rd have you been to that path/road/trail/geographically and looked the terrain over personally? Great piece of mental imagery and detecting on your part.

I will continue reading my book.



.
 
  • #220
Yes, I have been there, Camper, and talk about it later in the book. I hope my descriptions and imagery help to visualize this crime scene. Looking forward to more comments and questions as you read to discuss here.

rd
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
127
Guests online
2,279
Total visitors
2,406

Forum statistics

Threads
632,267
Messages
18,624,108
Members
243,072
Latest member
kevynarhude
Back
Top