D
Deleted member 39678
Guest
Interesting. So why didn't the Blackhawk pilots see the CRJ and avoid colliding with it?Yes. We wear NVGs as they actually increase our night vision.
Here's an example from the net:
Interesting. So why didn't the Blackhawk pilots see the CRJ and avoid colliding with it?Yes. We wear NVGs as they actually increase our night vision.
Here's an example from the net:
A tired surgeon generally can only harm one patient at time.
A tired ATController can hold the fate of hundreds of people at once.
Emphasis mine.I agree with you on this. I'd also say that the Apache was maintaining it's altitude the entire time whereas the CRJ (a Bombardier aircraft - pronounced as "Bombard Yay" [it's French Canadian word]) would have been dropping altitude as it lowered to land.
I think that it's entirely possible that the Apache did see the second aircraft instead. And that the CRJ was somewhat above the Apache (but lowering at the time) and therefore in a blindspot of the Apache's roof/panels above windows and of course the CRJ cannot see below itself either.
My amateur opinion only.
That makes it sound like it's totally unsafe for Blackhawk helicopters to use visual separation with other aircraft. JMO.Emphasis mine.
Agreed, and according to the views of Representative Mark Green (Tenn.)--- (The link is below ) mentions that helicopters are built primarily for looking downwards as in rescue operations or also in combat situations, and that it's more difficult for the pilot too see upwards, while looking through the windshield ?
And that the pilot might need to literally hang their head out of the side window to see in front of them if something was above & in front of them as well.
I've not flown in a heli. and have only seen footage from news clips or occasionally in movies , so I don't know what kind of visual range the heli. crew would have.
Imo.
![]()
What the Black Hawk pilots would have seen right before fatal crash
A former helicopter flight surgeon detailed what the pilots of the Black Hawk may have seen before the fatal plane crash in Washington, D.C.www.dailymail.co.uk
You have to wonder if the current location where Regan National Airport is located at is a cause of concern.
Among the concerns is that the airport is next to a river, and is also close to critical government buildings nearby.
And there are numerous military aircrafts are flying in the same airspace where a busy civilian airport is located.
I'm wondering if there is a need to build a brand new national airport for domestic flights at a new location somewhere in the Washington DC area that would be a whole lot safer for air travelers.
Of course a brand new national airport would not be very popular with many members of the U.S. Congress if Reagan National Airport were to be closed permanently.
I remember being at the Reagan airport, looking out the window from inside the terminal and just being amazed at how close the White House was. It didn’t seem safe to me then, and much less now.Seems that it should not be a hub, if it is so overcrowded with flights. I have passed through that airport on at least 3 occasions due to it being a hub ... when my destination was somewhere else.
"It is a hub for American Airlines."
![]()
Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You should look at a map of Chicago. Midway Airport is in a residential neighborhood, and there are houses literally across the street from the ends of the runways! I don't know how the people who live there have managed to preserve their hearing.You have to wonder if the current location where Regan National Airport is located at is a cause of concern.
Among the concerns is that the airport is next to a river, and is also close to critical government buildings nearby.
And there are numerous military aircrafts are flying in the same airspace where a busy civilian airport is located.
I'm wondering if there is a need to build a brand new national airport for domestic flights at a new location somewhere in the Washington DC area that would be a whole lot safer for air travelers.
Of course a brand new national airport would not be very popular with many members of the U.S. Congress if Reagan National Airport were to be closed permanently.
Beautifully said. Thank you.Thank you to those who posted videos of the young skaters doing their routines.
It’s difficult to watch these children, so nervous about landing their jumps etc., when we know now what fate would befall them.
I know they’ve all practiced nearly every day, for years and years, and I’m joyful (if that is the right word in such a time) to know their beauty will not fade away so long as we can still watch.
I don’t want it to all have been for nothing.
JMO
I posted my speculation in a post about 3 (of my) posts ago.Interesting. So why didn't the Blackhawk pilots see the CRJ and avoid colliding with it?
Someone interviewed today said the reason Dulles Airport was built was to replace National Airport. Afterwards, members of Congress insisted on keeping National because it was closer.You have to wonder if the current location where Regan National Airport is located at is a cause of concern.
Among the concerns is that the airport is next to a river, and is also close to critical government buildings nearby.
And there are numerous military aircrafts are flying in the same airspace where a busy civilian airport is located.
I'm wondering if there is a need to build a brand new national airport for domestic flights at a new location somewhere in the Washington DC area that would be a whole lot safer for air travelers.
Of course a brand new national airport would not be very popular with many members of the U.S. Congress if Reagan National Airport were to be closed permanently.
So your talking about your post mentioning helicopters and their blind spots from roof panels.I posted my speculation in a post about 3 (of my) posts ago.
Thanks for the video.
Wanted to ask, since the choppers don't use the runways at all, afaik, for landing/taking off, why go near the plane runways at all ?
Still do the training flights which are necessary -- but re-route them away from aircraft.
Omo.
I guess. Same as aircraft pilots can't see through their own roofs or floors when they are on VFR IMO. There has to be AC structure somewhere.So your talking about your post mentioning helicopters and their blind spots from roof panels.
So even with NVG's these helicopter pilots have poor visibility and can't maintain visual separation because of that. That's a very big problem IMO.