Debbie Bradley and Jeremy Irwin on Dr. Phil 3 February 2012

[Deleted member 39678]

This video played for me.

"Does it make me cross them off the list of suspects? No, it doesn't," he said. "But there is information in this interview that law enforcement will find informative."

Read more: http://www.kmbc.com/news/30362449/detail.html#ixzz1lHM7AZMk

 

[DeAnn]

I posted this in a different thread but just in case...

http://www.kctv5.com/story/16666001/jeremy-irwin-we-talked-to-police-earlier-today

 

[dog.gone.cute]

Good points Donjeta. I've felt pretty much from the beginning that DB was lying intentionally. I hope I'm wrong.

bbm-imho

:seeya: I agree ... it is going to be interesting to see what DB says on D P Show tomorrow and compare to her previous interviews ...

MOO ... The TRUTH NEVER CHANGES ...

If DB and JI would have consistently told the TRUTH from the beginning, and not changed their "stories" as well as the "timeline" ... there would be no need for them to "clarify" what they said earlier ...

MOO ...

 

[suzilight]

I am almost positive that JI, in one of the very early interviews in the d/w of the home, said when he got home all the lights were on. I will check it out & post the link.

 

[flipflop]

This may have been posted a gazillion times already but at what time is Dr. Phil on tomorrow? xoxoxo

3pm in Ontario

 

[flipflop]

It doesn't come on until 3 PM here either. I am fairly certain that it comes on in the morning in some parts of the country.

Dr. Phil was interviewed this morning by Lara Moritz, reporter at KMBC in KC. There are 4 parts to the interview (they are pretty short), they can be found to the right.

http://www.kmbc.com/video/30362999/detail.html

Thanks for posting the link to these interviews with Dr. Phil. Very interesting, but not surprised at his summary of the show. He seems to be saying what a good majority of us here have been saying all along...talk to LE so they can move past them and move on. I have not seen proof of them talking to LE since, but have heard mention of it...seems like Phil talked some sense into them.

I will not be home to see the show, I hope there is a link online here to watch once I get home!!!!

 

[In da Middle]

Thanks for posting the link to these interviews with Dr. Phil. Very interesting, but not surprised at his summary of the show. He seems to be saying what a good majority of us here have been saying all along...talk to LE so they can move past them and move on. I have not seen proof of them talking to LE since, but have heard mention of it...seems like Phil talked some sense into them.

I will not be home to see the show, I hope there is a link online here to watch once I get home!!!!

Or maybe he told the attorneys that their advice is doing more harm than good.
Or maybe they realized themselves that their attorneys advise is doing more harm than good.

 

[flipflop]

Or maybe he told the attorneys that their advice is doing more harm than good.
Or maybe they realized themselves that their attorneys advise is doing more harm than good.

Yes and it's about time they woke up and came to their senses!!!

 

[Sparklin]

Thursday, detectives met with Lisa’s parents and their attorney.

Read more: http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...-original-story-was-exaggerated#ixzz1lHdl74XA

Is the above an updated version of what I found on page 27 or 28?? Just wondering why no one has yet (I'm at the end of page 29) commented on the fact that the parents HAVE met with LE.

 

[Sparklin]

Thanks, interesting comments from Dr Phil. He doesn't seem to be convinced that DB is innocent, but believes that if they are they need to speak to LE so LE can get past them. I take that as they haven't been speaking to LE at all all this time? :waitasec:

In one of them, I think it was part two, he brings up the poly and says that JT said that LE put that misinfo out there to get DB to confess. LE never said anything, it was DB who put it out there. :waitasec:

LE put it out there to DB -- hence the getting 'her' to confess.

 

[CHERIE.T]

:seeya: I agree ... it is going to be interesting to see what DB says on D P Show tomorrow and compare to her previous interviews ...

MOO ... The TRUTH NEVER CHANGES ...

If DB and JI would have consistently told the TRUTH from the beginning, and not changed their "stories" as well as the "timeline" ... there would be no need for them to "clarify" what they said earlier ...

MOO ...

:seeya: I think it will be interesting to hear what questions Dr. P ask the parents and maybe even more interesting to hear how the parents answer the questions.
I'm with many of you who asked, why are Lisa's parents coming forth now? :waitasec:
imho

 

[CHERIE.T]

Read more: http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...-original-story-was-exaggerated#ixzz1lHdl74XA

Is the above an updated version of what I found on page 27 or 28?? Just wondering why no one has yet (I'm at the end of page 29) commented on the fact that the parents HAVE met with LE.

Are you referring to Lisa's parents first talking to LE about 3 months ago? Or are you referring to them talking to LE today. From your link-

Thursday, detectives met with Lisa’s parents and their attorney. Sgt. Stacey Graves with the Kansas City Police Department said investigators did not learn anything significant but are hopeful there will be more meetings in the future.

imho

 

[vlpate]

<respectfully snipped>

In one of them, I think it was part two, he brings up the poly and says that JT said that LE put that misinfo out there to get DB to confess. LE never said anything, it was DB who put it out there. :waitasec:

Polygraph
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/44813...issing-tot-cops-said-you-did-it/#.Tytn0sXOVEI

Misinformation? - "Bradley, 25, also admitted on Friday that she had failed a voluntary lie-detector test that was administered by police."
<snip>
"Earlier in the day, Irwin and Bradley spoke to the media about frantically searching their home for any sign of their daughter after her father came home from work early and she wasn't in her crib. They said they found an open window, an unlocked front door and house lights blazing, and later discovered that their three cellphones were gone."

http://foxnewsinsider.com/tag/missing-baby/
"While Kansas City Police Captain Steve Young won’t confirm that, he does confirm that as of last night Irwin’s parents are not cooperating with police."

"MOST" of the lights were on:
http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...-parents-terrified-but-trying-to-stay-hopeful
"When I came home from work, the front door was unlocked, most of the lights were on in the house and the window in the front was open,” Lisa's father, Jeremy Irwin said, saying that was all very unusual."
____________
Parsing words, that would be a defense attorney.

 

[vlpate]

Jeremy Irwin apparently has recent pics of Lisa for a new audience.

Us old ones don't get recent pics? Where the heck did he get recent pics?

JI commenting on why Dr. Phil now ....
]
"“A new audience will see more recent pictures and help bring her home,” said Jeremy Irwin."

 

[askfornina]

Jeremy Irwin apparently has recent pics of Lisa for a new audience.

Us old ones don't get recent pics? Where the heck did he get recent pics?

JI commenting on why Dr. Phil now ....
]
"&#8220;A new audience will see more recent pictures and help bring her home,&#8221; said Jeremy Irwin."

I read it as more recent pictures, as in "more" recent pictures. pictures in addition to the ones we already have. get what I'm saying? lol I hope so.

 

[vlpate]

I read it as more recent pictures, as in "more" recent pictures. pictures in addition to the ones we already have. get what I'm saying? lol I hope so.

Sorry, I was wrong, he didn't say "more" recent pictures, he just said "see recent pictures".

Here's the link: http://www.kctv5.com/story/16666001/irwin-bradley-talked-to-police-thursday?clienttype=printable

 

[octobermoon]

I read it as more recent pictures, as in "more" recent pictures. pictures in addition to the ones we already have. get what I'm saying? lol I hope so.

Feels or reads, hears like we are all speaking the same ???? and then we say !!!! and someone says "facts" and round and round we go.

My point is Lisa deserves more from all of us to bring her home.

If going on this show gets Lisa more media coverage. Then it is worth it in my eyes. We can all be right in the end if Lisa is safe.

 

[dog.gone.cute]

from : http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2012/01/27/lisa-irwin-case-debbie-and-jeremy-due-dr-phil/


:waitasec: I wonder if DB got her tatoo before the P McG Show and she will show it to the doc ...

:waitasec: Or maybe she got it after the show ...

moo ...

 

[Sabot]

I am not certain why I should feel reassured that DB passed the polygraph when she simultaneously demonstrates that she lied to the cops without batting an eye because she thinks it is justified. So what is her passing the polygraph supposed to prove? It only shows that she is the sort of person who can lie to the police without flunking the poly.

What is the point of a polygraph if they are only to be believed when someone apparently fails the test?
But then I always have thought that something not usable in Court is pretty pointless anyway.

 

[Sabot]

[B
When he came into the house that morning and said all the lights were on in the house," Bradley continued, "it was a total exaggeration

Read more: http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...original-story-was-exaggerated#ixzz1lGlXgWu3][/B]

Holy smokes, Deb admits they lied to police. If they "exaggerted" on that, what else did they lie on.

Where is Baby Lisa?

No she didn't admit they lied to the Police. This is a common exaggeration from the one who pays the bills. I have said the same thing to my children.