Debunking the Defense's Theories.........

Status
Not open for further replies.
The attached is Chapter 4 - Maybe some of my ideas come from here?
http://www.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬.net/120671 Chapter 4

ALSO - I never said anything in a FACTUAL form, I meerly sugest that we have neither seen or heard everything yet.
I said and I still say there is talk so let us consider that too........ it is not over till the bat lady sings.
Lets not just close the book on IT HAD TO BE CASEY >>>>the END. but maybe it is!

I read all 4 chapters you asked for a link happy reading......
http://www.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬.net/120612 Chapter 1
http://www.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬.net/120622 Chapter 2
http://www.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬.net/120622 Cahpter 3

I have read this and all that I take from this is that kidfinders is a sham. How do you think this help's KC? :confused:
 
I have read this and all that I take from this is that kidfinders is a sham. How do you think this help's KC? :confused:
They are a sham LOL but you read 4 links and that is ALL YOU GOT :eek:
I can not help sorry.
 
They are a sham LOL but you read 4 links and that is ALL YOU GOT :eek:
I can not help sorry.

first of all, two of your link's were the same article. I never did find part 3&4.
And yes, maybe I am stupid, but I still can not see how this in any way explains KC"s lies and actions, her cold indifference to the death of her baby. Maybe you should e-mail this to JB?
 
Sorry, I don't put much faith in that site or the peeps who hang out there---so I don't go there. Guess I'll just have to stay "dumb".
 
The attached is Chapter 4 - Maybe some of my ideas come from here?
http://www.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬.net/120671 Chapter 4

ALSO - I never said anything in a FACTUAL form, I meerly sugest that we have neither seen or heard everything yet.
I said and I still say there is talk so let us consider that too........ it is not over till the bat lady sings.
Lets not just close the book on IT HAD TO BE CASEY >>>>the END. but maybe it is!

I read all 4 chapters you asked for a link happy reading......
http://www.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬.net/120612 Chapter 1
http://www.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬.net/120622 Chapter 2
http://www.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬.net/120622 Cahpter 3

In regards to KC or the A's having any "connections" to anyone, if you get my drift- I just don't see it.
First- KC would not have to steal petty monies from family and friends.
Second- The A's would not have been having financial problems.
Third and most importantly - They are not the type of people that those "People" would want anything to do with. They have nothing to offer those types of "people."
If there is any monies to be gotten, or promised, it would have to be deals about a movie and /or books.
 
I think they are going to try to do a O.J. here but its going to backfire. I just wish they would charge Cindy with obstruction of evidence.
 
I really think they will go with the smoke & mirrors defense. They will attack forensic evidence ("junk science") while throwing out distractions. There really isn't any other way for them to defend her. She's really painted herself in a corner with her ridiculous statements to police.

:clap::clap::clap::clap:
 
believe the defense ONLY defense will be in the forensic evidence. Attacking of that and as far as EB husband being such a renowned scientist, I believe his opinion has been debunked more than once~ Such as HL with MM, he missed the small injection mark in her thigh.. These expert witnesses are not the perfect witness! JMO and NICE JOB ON THE POST~~

Wait, what? How did I miss this? Are you for real?
 
I recall also, that recently, JB made a comment on TV stating that nobody knows the real KC. And- he thinks he does? :waitasec:


:yow: Yes he does!! That's what's been so funny all along. I don't understand the "ugly coping" theory. In his comparison of KC's case to the case of CS, CS was charged with the murder of her husband not her child... a jury is not as sympathetic IMO to a woman charged with murdering her child, and then see the mother out "partying like a rockstar" days later. JMO

I think if the SA sticks to the evidence and facts that they can present in this case, they are home free. :woohoo:
 
Casey's time on June 16 was limited. I believe she deliberately and efficiently gagged Caylee because it was the fastest and most effective way to accomplish what Casey wanted done. JMO

Respectfully snipped.

You know, I have been thinking all this time that she had been drugging poor Caylee. I had never allowed myself to think about the above possibility. With the release of the documents indicating no drugs in the toxicology reports, your theory could be a possibility. She could have used the tape to suffocate her. Wow...that is just so horrific...:(
 
I would like to point out that it did not take KC "31 days" to report Caylee missing...KC NEVER reported her daughter missing!
 
Great topic RevCrim. It's just that there are too many topics within the one topic. so in the future when we try to resurrect the conversation for new information or its relevance during trial, it is frustrating because there is talk of filicide, hairs and ugly coping all in one thread. If you would like to start a thread debunking each separate defense that would be great. Then we could have focused discussion on each defense and will be more valuble to us during trial or as new evidence becomes available. I bumped some threads to see if they help, but break it down. thanks!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
142
Guests online
891
Total visitors
1,033

Forum statistics

Threads
626,905
Messages
18,535,279
Members
241,151
Latest member
Drifterchic
Back
Top