Defense doesn't want GA & CA in the courtroom....why?

[lowens1975]

:floorlaugh: I always heard "he who smelled it dealt it." You know, the DT keeps talking about ICA getting a fair trial, but it looks like they have no intention of trying a fair case. They intend to try a sneaky, underhanded case.

BBM

It's "Poker" with the media and "Chess" with SA.

 

[Aedrys]

BBM

It's "Poker" with the media and "Chess" with SA.

Except it's Baez holding the cards with a terrible poker face and no idea about Chess other than the he wants to be the king. :floorlaugh:

 

[Solace]

Except it's Baez holding the cards with a terrible poker face and no idea about Chess other than the he wants to be the king. :floorlaugh:

He has already won. he has the case of the century. Everyone knows his name. He has won; that is what he wanted.

 

[Aedrys]

He has already won. he has the case of the century. Everyone knows his name. He has won; that is what he wanted.

Okay, if you call winning losing an entire career and becoming a joke of a lawyer, sure...or winning in a Charlie Sheen sense of the word...

 

[alwaysonmymind]

No wonder GA has been MIA. I think back to all those protesters in front of their house on Hopespring all those days and nights, the security G/CA had to hire, etc..

IF the DT decides to pin this all on GA, the public is going to go mad and GA should worry dearly about his safety and well being. I had a suspicion GA would be pinned for the murder of little Caylee Marie, especially since he told the court under oath that he "would do anything to save ICA's life". Makes sense to me why he's not been to the hearings. JMO.

IMO, the public will not accept ICA's lies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Solace]

Okay, if you call winning losing an entire career and becoming a joke of a lawyer, sure...or winning in a Charlie Sheen sense of the word...

It is not me who calls it winning Aedrys. It is people like Yuri Melich who says his name is known nationwide, Schaeffer. It is the case of the century and he has it and that is winning for him.

Charlie Sheen has nothing to do with this Aedrys. You have so much dislike for these people that you can't seem to see the obvious. What lawyer would not want this case. Cheney Mason says that he has been called by many of the lawyers on TV asking him to hire them.

Little Jose Baez has nailed the case of the century, whether you like it or not.

 

[Aedrys]

It is not me who calls it winning Aedrys. It is people like Yuri Melich who says his name is known nationwide, Schaeffer. It is the case of the century and he has it and that is winning for him.

Charlie Sheen has nothing to do with this Aedrys. You have so much dislike for these people that you can't seem to see the obvious. What lawyer would not want this case. Cheney Mason says that he has been called by many of the lawyers on TV asking him to hire them.

Little Jose Baez has nailed the case of the century, whether you like it or not.

Yes it is, you are the one who said Baez is winning. Now you're saying he's not? Just because his name is known is not a good thing. People also know who Ted Bundy is, Charles Manson - Baez will be infamous for this. It is not going to have people lining up at his door for his services, just the opposite. He has made himself look like an utter fool of a lawyer. He can't write or argue a motion at all. And notice that no lawyers worth their salt were willing to touch this case. Not even experts who are real experts will testify for Casey. Yeah, this is a case most people don't want to be a part of, that's how infamous it is.

And yes I have a dislike for these people that don't care about the precious, innocent life of a toddler, who are only spouting the innocence of the mother who should have loved and protected her child instead of murdering her, and who have made a mockery and farce of the justice system thus far for their own selfish, egotistical, and greedy agendas. Baez is as insane as Charlie Sheen if he thinks he's winning. I will stand up and will continue to stand up for Caylee over any of them any day of the week.

That's what this is about - not you, not me, but Caylee, most importantly, Justice for Caylee. Let's not squabble over who's right or who's wrong. We both want justice for Caylee. Let's leave it at that.

 

[ynotdivein]

We have a detailed, formal Terms of Service (TOS) posted separately, and that TOS is what you will be held to as a member here. It's long and detailed because it has to be in the world we live in, and you are expected to read it, understand it and abide by it. However, we can sum it up as follows:

1) Be a decent human being;
2) Treat your fellow posters as the decent human beings they are;
3) Keep in mind that whatever you post will likely live on forever, so think before you press "Submit Reply".
4) It's a big world. People will disagree with you. You will disagree with them. This can be done with respect, and that's what we expect.

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65793"]http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=65793[/ame]

One weekend to go. Eyes on the prize, folks.

 

[Patty G]

Posts in this thread are getting SNARKY, Baiting, and getting to a point that everyone either needs to take a break so that what is happening doesn't shut down this thread.

Please, get up and walk away from your computer for a while and take a break. Too much is happening today.

PERHAPS a little self editing is IN ORDER!

 

[azwriter]

Oh yes - interesting statements from Mr Mason. We'll see.

I so look forward to Baez explaining the 31 days in his opening statement- he said it will become clear and should lay to rest any questions. Should be one hell of a shocker - since it's been the number one question on most peeps minds. Has there ever been a logical answer or theory regarding this from anyone?

Well, Baez can explain away the 31 days ICA did not report or make known that her daughter was missing. He can go days on end with his opening remarks on that subject. However, the trial is built on evidence. The jury comes to its conclusion by evidence presented in court by witnesses, not what a defense attorney has to say in opening statement.

Unless he can back up his explaination with proof, the jury will surely notice his empty words if no evidence comes forth to back up Baez's remarks to explain away ICA's behavior.

Since we have been lead to believe ICA told no one about Caylee being missing and that she was conducting her own search for those 31 days, just who will be sworn in and testify to prove what ever excuses Baez claims in his opening statement? The jury panel is going to want proof to back up what Baez says.

Putting ICA on the stand is the only way I can imagine that the proof needed to his explaination would be heard in court. And, that we know is never going to happen.
jmo

 

[ZsaZsa]

HHJP just agreed to let them in to the trial. They can sit in the gallery.
If there are any problems with that ,then they will be sequestered.

 

[ynotdivein]

After today's hearing, exactly how much clearer could it possibly be to CA/GA that ICA wants absolutely NOTHING to do with them?

 

[Felix]

When JB had GA on the witness stand during the hearings of March 2, 3, and 4, he asked GA if he would do anything for his daughter and granddaughter, to which GA replied (words to the effect of), "he would do anything for his daughter and granddaughter."

JB's immediate response to that was, "even if I told you to not come to court?" (not exact, but words to that effect). GA said yes, he wouldn't come to court.

I think keeping the Anthonys out of the courtroom has been a DT plan for some time. This is not something they just came up with.

CM made a statement that there would be devastating news about the Anthonys at trial. A question for all.............Where's Lee in all this? If the DT paints a picture of GA and CA being abusive and that Casey was afraid of her parents, is Lee going to go along and testify to that?[/QUOTE]

An interesting blast from the past (Dec 08) from Tom Luka re possible impact of LA's testimony. Interesting.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eEtKT8VUig&feature=channel_video_title[/ame]

 

[DaughterAlice]

When JB had GA on the witness stand during the hearings of March 2, 3, and 4, he asked GA if he would do anything for his daughter and granddaughter, to which GA replied (words to the effect of), "he would do anything for his daughter and granddaughter."

JB's immediate response to that was, "even if I told you to not come to court?" (not exact, but words to that effect). GA said yes, he wouldn't come to court.

I think keeping the Anthonys out of the courtroom has been a DT plan for some time. This is not something they just came up with.

CM made a statement that there would be devastating news about the Anthonys at trial. A question for all.............Where's Lee in all this? If the DT paints a picture of GA and CA being abusive and that Casey was afraid of her parents, is Lee going to go along and testify to that?[/QUOTE]

An interesting blast from the past (Dec 08) from Tom Luka re possible impact of LA's testimony. Interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eEtKT8VUig&feature=channel_video_title

Woa, and at the end Tom Luca morphs into some kind of lizard alien (V?)!

Despite the interesting visual effects, a good interview. Thanks Felix. It was very interesting about how a parent's testimony can make a jury sympathetic to the defendant, that of a sibling can be the opposite.

 

[strawberry]

Posts in this thread are getting SNARKY, Baiting, and getting to a point that everyone either needs to take a break so that what is happening doesn't shut down this thread.

Please, get up and walk away from your computer for a while and take a break. Too much is happening today.

PERHAPS a little self editing is IN ORDER!

Please please do if needed! I love you all and don't want to watch all this without you!! PS I have a terrible temper so I know how hard it is!! People talk about ICA's blowup in the Aug 14 jail visit and I go really? I've blown up much worse than that!

 

[TotallyObsessed]

Woa, and at the end Tom Luca morphs into some kind of lizard alien (V?)!

Despite the interesting visual effects, a good interview. Thanks Felix. It was very interesting about how a parent's testimony can make a jury sympathetic to the defendant, that of a sibling can be the opposite.

Good Gawd...that scared the carp out of me!

I had never seen this interview.

 

[lowens1975]

After today's hearing, exactly how much clearer could it possibly be to CA/GA that ICA wants absolutely NOTHING to do with them?

We'll know tomorrow by 9:00 am, won't we? If CA and GA show up and she turns them away, I'd say it's a sure bet she doesn't have anything to say to them. Listening to the A's attorney this afternoon when he left the courthouse made me think even the lawyers aren't talking to each other...

 

[Felix]

Bold mine

Within days of Caylee being reported missing Joyce and Bailley Dickens (neighbours of the Anthonys and the Torres family) told Police about Kio Marie Torres and Kio's mother's belief as to Caylee not only being dead but that her body was likely dumped in the wooded area off Suburban and behind the school. Well albeit they figured the other side of the road, it seems the Torres family were right.

Point being, I'm sure Cindy Anthony and Baez were well aware of the local rumours about woods that were circulating around Hopespring from very early on. So no Freudian slip imho.

That said, I believe both George and Cindy knew Caylee to be dead before she was found. How long before?........ is always going to be a talking point.

ITA -- whether it was the woods on Suburban Drive or some other wooded area near the Anthony home -- ITA. From Nov '08:
http://www.wftv.com/video/17891724/index.html

 

[biggirl]

We'll know tomorrow by 9:00 am, won't we? If CA and GA show up and she turns them away, I'd say it's a sure bet she doesn't have anything to say to them. Listening to the A's attorney this afternoon when he left the courthouse made me think even the lawyers aren't talking to each other...

Will we know tomorrow AM if ICA agreed to see her mother?? How will we find out?? Will they have to release the record that the visit happened and for how long?? Sorry if this has already been asked and answered. I just really want to see if this happens.

 

[Carrington]

IMO, the public will not accept ICA's lies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your so right.
Hundreds upon hundreds of THE PUBLIC has been on these threads in the past 3 years, very few and I mean very few have accepted her lies.
Why would a jury....just like us.
IMO