Italicized quotes below are from OP link.
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/soci...st-andrew-anderson-19-giving-discounts-stores#
"When an employee at Goodwill’s store in Naples, Fla., started handing out freelance discounts to the shops poorest customers..." BBM
Did the reporter verify that this employee gave discounts to the only poorest employees? How? Did reporter rely on the employee's statement?
And
how did employee determine 'poorest?'
For the 'poorest people', did employee ask his mgr. about giving discounts? Did mgr say no? Or did manager say yes, one time for one sale, and from that, the employee decided to give discounts as he saw fit?
Based on the article, employee gave discounts selectively based on his own criteria.
"Anderson worked behind the counter at the Naples Goodwill outlet. He would often see the community’s poorest people come into the store, looking to buy clothes but with only a few bucks to their name." BBM
Did customers show the employee their bank statements? Pay stubs?
(Sarcasm here. I know the poorest customers do not or may not have bank a/cs or jobs.)
An aside: A few months ago, at Salvation Army I saw a local shop owner at S/A counter asking for a discount on her purchases. A week later, while browsing in her high-end shop, I saw a few of the items she had purchased. Would Anderson have discounted her purchases, based on faded, threadbare clothing she was wearing that day?
Did
employee receive something from these 'poorest customers' other than to "
watch the delight on the faces"?
As others here noted, did he
discount for his family and friends?
Regardless of who received the discounts, discount
policy was not his to make and various
discounts were not his to give.
Did he do this one or two times? If so, I doubt we would be reading about this.
--------------------------------------------------------------
One Sided Reporting?
"
While Goodwill on its own website pledges, 'We treat all people with dignity and respect,' the company had little respect for Anderson."
Like other employment-termination-criminal charges news, it seems we are only reading info from one side.
Perhaps Goodwill did "respect" the employee, perhaps had counseled him numerous times about the store discount policy, perhaps had had other issues (tardiness, unexcused absences, refusal to follow other policies).
The employee had
little respect for his employer, IMO.
Typically the employer does not comment, and typically it is policy not to comment about pending criminal charges.
The employer provided enough info for felony theft charges, per article. That says a lot.
JM:twocents: and as always, I may be wrong.