sammie
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
- Messages
- 685
- Reaction score
- 0
They did NOT think the killer was remorseful. And NOon computer, is what they thought.
I thought they said it didn't matter about the




They did NOT think the killer was remorseful. And NOon computer, is what they thought.
You shouldn't be on the jury if you cant or wont deliberate, that is part of your job.
I agree.I don't understand the anger at someone who voted their conviction and based on what they saw.
What the heck...? I don't even.OMG jurors talking - they are angry --they told the judge about the holdout being unwilling to deliberate and JSS would not replace her!!
so I am not feeling confident about CMJA getting LWOP
I'm sorry if it is disrespectful or whatever but that judge should be removed.
hold out said it felt like jurors were out for revenge.
i am stunned
It's the best possible outcome. 11 saw no reason for her to keep breathing so couldn't have believed a word she said. One made it through voire dire when she shouldn't have and was vulnerable to believing DV when there wasn't any. Maybe she was the juror who wanted off and was refused, maybe she wasn't. It doesn't matter.
Perryville with the DP turns out to be, after a few months there, no different than Perryville with LWOP. The DP wasn't going to mean isolation enough to make any long term difference in how she exists for the rest of her life (may it be a very short one). This way she's cut off in ways that do matter to her, and the Alexanders are as free of her as they ever are going to be.
The one hold out had her mind made up from the beginning. The DP was a form of revenge. Why Why was she allowed on to cause all this frustration.