Do his parents know the truth?

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #61
jilly said:
I understand what you're saying Fran but wasn't Scott already charged before the DA was obligated to turn over anything to his attorneys?

It makes sense that first the charges are laid, a trial date is set where the accused elects a Judge and jury or Judge alone, then there may be some discussion about making a deal and finally full disclosure as the trial date approaches.
 
  • #62
raisincharlie said:
Must have been just the facts and hopefully she told LE who murdered Michelle since she claims to know. Wonder why LE isn't focusing on that person ? Now we have it - LE is on the wrong track...yea, right. :slap:

Yea, it is amazing isn't it. This same person who says yes, they know who did it is salting that board with statements that IMHO are untrue to get us all off on a different tangent. He/she says Michelle's valuable jewelry was burgled {and they took the jewelry drawers too} and that the insurance policy was not purchased 3 mos before her death. Also that they were a very happy loving couple.

I don't think any of that is true, as our sources are quite good. The police said right away that it was not a burglary, RPD stated he had talked to the insurance agent who sold the million dollar policy and indeed it was approx 3 months before she died. I believe him. And just the affair alone would mean this couple were not the picture perfect married couple.

Someone out there is going crazeee with too much time on his hands I think. and wanting to try and shape the case in the way he wants it to be seen.
 
  • #63
otto said:
It makes sense that first the charges are laid, a trial date is set where the accused elects a Judge and jury or Judge alone, then there may be some discussion about making a deal and finally full disclosure as the trial date approaches.

I think so although I'm not sure about how they go about choosing the type of trial they want. I remember something about electing to have a speedy one because after that Geragos caused all sorts of delays!! I can't go by my memory but I think SP was charged in the April and it was months afterward that the prelim started.
 
  • #64
jilly said:
I think so although I'm not sure about how they go about choosing the type of trial they want. I remember something about electing to have a speedy one because after that Geragos caused all sorts of delays!! I can't go by my memory but I think SP was charged in the April and it was months afterward that the prelim started.

I know that he was charged in April when Laci and Conner were found. After that, the dates are all fuzzy for me. The police did not disclose prior to Scott being charged, as it would have tipped him off sooner to flee the country.
 
  • #65
otto said:
I know that he was charged in April when Laci and Conner were found. After that, the dates are all fuzzy for me. The police did not disclose prior to Scott being charged, as it would have tipped him off sooner to flee the country.

Yes of course. Good point!
 
  • #66
scandi said:
Yea, it is amazing isn't it. This same person who says yes, they know who did it is salting that board with statements that IMHO are untrue to get us all off on a different tangent. He/she says Michelle's valuable jewelry was burgled {and they took the jewelry drawers too} and that the insurance policy was not purchased 3 mos before her death. Also that they were a very happy loving couple.

I don't think any of that is true, as our sources are quite good. The police said right away that it was not a burglary, RPD stated he had talked to the insurance agent who sold the million dollar policy and indeed it was approx 3 months before she died. I believe him. And just the affair alone would mean this couple were not the picture perfect married couple.

Someone out there is going crazeee with too much time on his hands I think. and wanting to try and shape the case in the way he wants it to be seen.
Scandi,

I just don't know what to say about it. JTF always has opened a whole lot more doors than she ever shut IMO. Nonsensical at times - taking the drawers is a fine example - no burglar is going to bother with the drawers. Personally, I think LE would have noticed the drawers being gone and just might have thought there was a burglary. Common sense is in low supply there IMO. Crazy !!!

I agree, the relationship doesn't exude the picture of a happy marriage, what's even worse - a sorority sister - supposedly a good friend who lives out of state - that's pretty low and pretty much a picture of how JY likes things to be - out of sight-out of mind JMO.

By the way - lots of trees hanging on the lines here - if I dsiappear its because the phone lines are gone... :(
 
  • #67
raisincharlie said:
By the way - lots of trees hanging on the lines here - if I dsiappear its because the phone lines are gone... :(

Wishing you luck here RC. I know all about falling trees this year, lol.
Last week I learned something new although everyone else probably knows. We lost our power for 12 hrs. I picked up the phone and it was dead.

The next morning (power still out) I heard a phone ringing. I thought it was the fax and just ignored it. Well it kept ringing and I went into the office and it was the phone. I'm thinking how can that be? Long story short - with a power outage you lose your cordless phones but with a cord phone you don't. I sure felt stupid but I had no idea! :doh:
 
  • #68
RC and Scandi, I read those posts a couple days ago from JTF. Are they posting again or are you talking about what they posted a few days ago? I did see what they were saying about the jewelry, etc.

Let me ask you this; any guess who this person is? I always suspected that poster was MM from awhile ago and was telling things as she knew them to be from Jason which may not be the truth. This time that persons posts look like downright concochted lies and desperate attempts to defend Jason. Maybe MM but I'm thinking nother lover :eek:
 
  • #69
strach304 said:
RC and Scandi, I read those posts a couple days ago from JTF. Are they posting again or are you talking about what they posted a few days ago? I did see what they were saying about the jewelry, etc.

Let me ask you this; any guess who this person is? I always suspected that poster was MM from awhile ago and was telling things as she knew them to be from Jason which may not be the truth. This time that persons posts look like downright concochted lies and desperate attempts to defend Jason. Maybe MM but I'm thinking nother lover :eek:
Strach,

Are you all better luv? Hope so !

The posts we are talking about were from a couple of days ago - I think right before the magazine article came out. JTF seems to surface when some stuff is about to hit the fan. I have kinda thought it might be one of JYs sisters myself but honestly - it could be a law clerk as easily ! Another girl friend - well if it is I doubt she told LE that part of it - she claims to have been interviewed by LE and so far nothing about a second girlfriend has surfaced. She also claims to be truthful - so if she is another gf, she definitely isn't all that honest as a second one would definitely get LE's hinky meters going.

I think overall however that she doth protest too much ! I certainly don't understand how the heck she thinks she is going to change a public forum that is designed for speculation and brainstorming. That's what is really weird - why would anyone care - it is not like the majority of posters are even anywhere near NC ? No tainted jury pool there to try and influence. That is why I think it is a relative - the forum means nothing yet there they are posting away - very defensively. JMO

ETA - her calling RPD out and posting names on a message board like she did - IMO is an act of desperation. Someone who does indeed talk to JY - IMO
 
  • #70
I read over there today some. JTF's last post was on the 1/11 thread. I went to his profile to find the last posts. It is curious how he/she comes and goes. There's another one or two there that get defensive now, Cougarmom and Jays Fan. Could the same people be signing in under different hats?
 
  • #71
I'm getting there RC, thanks. I never thought that particular poster was deliberately misleading when they first started posting and then when the MM info came out so many of them disappeared and stopped posting altogether. Now they reappear and it really looks to me like they aren't being truthful. What they hope to accomplish I don't know.
 
  • #72
Why bother to only take the drawers anyway?

Heck, just take the whole box and nutting but the box, so help you nutcase

Lol
Sami
 
  • #73
Samiya said:
Why bother to only take the drawers anyway?

Heck, just take the whole box and nutting but the box, so help you nutcase

Lol
Sami
Better put than what I was trying to say - IMO the only person that might take the drawers is one unfamiliar with burglary and one making an effort to make LE think there was a burglary. I wonder who that might have been...
 
  • #74
jilly said:
Afternoon Close - evening to you! :)
I remember that about JaneO2!! Come to think of it Jane never came back did she?

morning jilly:)

nope, Jane02 made one post, & one post only.....& that was about the neighborhood rumors of a girlfriend in FL and that a delivery truck saw JY's vehicle at the home, when he should have been out on the road for his business meeting..... :cool:
 
  • #75
scandi said:
I read that too Close, where RPD says he is male and is married. I think I've heard him infer that his wife was a sorority sister friend of Michelle's.

JTF, Oftentimes I think it is Jason. He is used to posting on sport forums and must be going bonkers about now doing nothing that we know of. I think it really ires him that boards discuss this case at great depths, and his male ego can't quite handle these thoughts being out there. He's smart and has tried to correct things to where he wants them and to throw false info out to throw us off kilt. He probably knows LE reads at CTV - they read here too as our Mod told us that when Laci went missing.

Unless it is a law clerk doing the bidding of Mr Smith, who else would go to bat for JY on such a continual basis than the man himself!

i didn't know that JY use to post on sports forums...???? hmmmmmm, how did you find this bit of info?
 
  • #76
jilly said:
Very good points Scandi. One things for sure - Jason is not Jay's fan. LOL its probably Justin Falconer!! :crazy: No....second thought can't be Justin - too educated.

LOL @its probably Justin Falconer!!
 
  • #77
I read it somewhere :D Really, I'm trying to think. It had to be at CTV. I'm sure of that as it is the only other place I read about the case escept for links. And the person who wrote this named the two sports sites where he posted, so I thought that looked pretty good for a source on a tip. I just read it last week, but had read it before about a month ago. Yea, he is used to forumworld.

In that first or second post that I distinctly remember as being made by JTF and not Just the facts {the posts are now shown as made by Just the facts}, where he came to correct things being stated on the forum that were not true, he made the comment he had been in their house many many times, and he really infered he was family in many statements he made. Now we learn he knows they have good credit and were not in finacial straits. I think it is JY posting. Just a feeling in my bones. How would a sister know they had good credit? Things like that are not usually discussed, even in families IMHO.
 
  • #78
:laugh:
Samiya said:
Why bother to only take the drawers anyway?

Heck, just take the whole box and nutting but the box, so help you nutcase

Lol
Sami

That visual reminds me of old movies where they show the cat burgular dumping the jewels from the drawers into their stash bag.
If and that is a big if, Michele had a lot of expensive jewelry that was taken my first thought was it was part of a pay-off arranged by JY for the killer.
 
  • #79
close_enough said:
LOL @its probably Justin Falconer!!

That's hilarious, everytime I see his posts I picture JF too. :eek:
 
  • #80
fran said:
Snip....I also believe that anytime LE comes up with anything 'exculpatory,' they must turn that over to the defendents attorney.

JMHO
fran
Not if you are Nifong. Sorry, I just love sticking it to that 🤬🤬🤬 hat every chance I can. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
129
Guests online
1,203
Total visitors
1,332

Forum statistics

Threads
632,432
Messages
18,626,413
Members
243,149
Latest member
Pgc123
Back
Top