Does Anyone here think Casey Anthony is innocent?

[Foxxtrot]

That is true.

Also, according an article by Diane Dimond, mothers who murder usually leave their children close to home.

A study of mothers who murder reveals most dispose of their children's bodies in "a womb-like way." The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children reports the victims are often found carefully wrapped in plastic or submerged in water and the bodies were usually found within ten miles of the family home.
​

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/diane-dimond/a-missing-child-a-silent_b_124535.html

I can go for ten miles but 2, 3 or 4 blocks defies logic IMO.

 

[Foxxtrot]

Can I ask how you could have read more?

Maybe she didn't read all the documents.

 

[anastacia129]

I can go for ten miles but 2, 3 or 4 blocks defies logic IMO.

it also defies logic to kill your child.

 

[costalpilot]

Not sure if she was really given sedatives after hearing about the finding of the body or if this was something her attorney only said...however, look at the video at her attorney's office...I think it was the day she went back to jail...she is standing there "trying" to drum up tears...she finally does only when the attny. says "she is somebody's child" ....those words hit her and she was thinking of one person....herself...I still do not understand the lack of emotion EVEN from her defense team at the horrific mess this is...the lack of emotion from her and them continues to baffle me....no crying to the media from them or family or pleading to end this.......my favorite saying is this........it is what it is.......she is guilty as sin.:furious:

my bolding.

that is absolutely the truth...the only times I have seen her actually tear up, rather than dab at her eyes, was when Jose was talking about poor little KC.

and if that isn't telling, nothing is....

 

[gitana1]

you are correct in your statement that I bolded above. But the defense will have a bucket full of evidence as well. We just don' t know what that is as it hasn't been leaked like the state evidence.

What makes you so sure? I don't believe they have a darn thing!

 

[RR0004]

If she can sit in front of investigators and lie through her teeth to them, to her parents, even keep this away from the people closet to her..you don't think she could come up with this much info on her own?

The way I look at it, she never came up with any useful info period. All she did was lie...and that's what liars do real well...lie.

 

[mydailyopinions]

I have no idea what they will present. I can only guess that it will be the nanny theory. IMO Casey can still get away with the nanny theory if they do it right.

I don't wish for anothers finger prints to be on the tape, only that if there are other prints then IMO that if huge reasonable doubt.

If I understand you correctly you are saying that if there is another persons prints on the tape then the prosecution can say it is there because Casey stole the tape with the prints already on them. If that is right then I don't understand because you would have to intentionally peal the tape back put your prints on it and then lay the tape back down on the roll. Why would someone do that?

I'm expecting JB to come in with a defense that shows some logic.

What kind of defense could he use that is logical? 31 days? I just don't see any excuse for it, or anything logical that will help explain any kind of innocence.

 

[Tichad3]

Not I McFly.

 

[sabego]

If you watch almost any Defense Attorney, they always say things exactly like JB is saying. But when this comes to court it will be similar to the Peterson trial. Nothing! Please take what they say with a grain of salt. It is their job to defend their client. They really don't have to even present a defense in court. The Prosecution has the present its case and the defense can question everything, but they really don't have to present anything. Let's just wait and see.

 

[ecs5298]

IMO Casey can still get away with the nanny theory if they do it right.

Not trying to be snarky but could you expound on "if they do it right".

 

[lin]

Then I guess the prosecution's experts are also paid . I doubt any of them will work for free.

Only if their conclusions are influenced by who signs their check.

 

[RR0004]

We are not her defense lawyers.....we see the facts and go from there. There are NO facts supporting her innocence.

Brilliantly said IMO. Thanks.

 

[Foxxtrot]

that tone is getting less emphatic every day, imo. He barely got it out last time I saw him say it. I don't believe he believes it in the least and I don't think he's smart enough to realize he would be better off just saying his client will have her day in court.

jmo.

I still like JB so I am hoping he keeps his mouth shut from here on out.

 

[gitana1]

I am saying that there appears to be an abundance of evidence against her. I don't deny that. I think the defense has evidence that has not been brought to the public view yet. Baez keeps saying we don't know the whole story. I am saying I agree "we don't know the whole story". Ther's more to it, more people, accidental which scared who was involved for whatever reason, could have been blackmailed and after her arrest, blackmail went bad. Drugs, smuggling, stolen parts, travel to get rid of stuff, I'm thowing stuffout that you have already discussed. Gang retribution in Floirda is not nice. Promises of paying someone in some type of illegal activity that doesn't happen, you lose your life or someone else you love and then you're fearful to say anything. Maybe somebody killed her daughter in front of her, and she had to do what only a parent could do and take her baby home in the trunk of the car. Maybe the duct tape was put on the girl by whomever and not Casey. Maybe Casey was crushed and wrapped her in a special blanket with special thing and put the kiss on her lips forever from her mom. I don't know BUT these things happen in our country. Sick as it is, she maybe guilty of a crime but not necessarily 1st degree murder. I just don't know but I do know what happens when these young people get involved with "friends" and find themselves in preety serious life threating situations. I have 1st hand information on this.

I disagree with this. I have not read of any cases where a baby was killed for gang retribution. I'm not saying there has never been one, but if so, it's rare. casey simply does not seem the type to me to be involved in scary gang/drug activity. She was a petty thief before the murder. That's about all. I don't fall for the defense conspiracy theories for a moment. casey may like the idea that she could be thought of to be a part of a scary underground, but, look at her, her friends, her background. Please! She was just an average person from an average dysfunctional family. I'll never believe that she some scary gangster.

 

[Foxxtrot]

it also defies logic to kill your child.

I realize that but that wasn't the logic we were talking about.

 

[gitana1]

She is afforded the right of being innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. This is the court of public opinion which is afforded to us by the 1st Amendment.

Bam! There it is!

 

[lin]

Not trying to be snarky but could you expound on "if they do it right".

Ditto.

I think it would be very, very interesting to try to come up with plausible defense scenarios based on the info available.

As I've previously repeated, the lack of panic, upset or surprised behavior seals the intent for me, but I'd be very interested to read the opinions of others, or those who enjoy being devil's advocate, how this can be consistent with an accidental death or KC not being guilty of either.

Plus, I really enjoy debate.

 

[Indigo]

When it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, swims like a duck and walks like a duck, it's a duck, not a dog in costume. While it is always good to look outside the box, facts can be beyond dispute.

My life experience tells me a "mother" wouldn't be arm in arm with her new squeeze before her baby's body had had time to cool off IF the death was a surprise.

I also cannot rationalize putting duct tape over my baby's face. Or happily chattering away to people about my baby being at park/beach having such a GOOD time after I'd taped over my baby's face...

JMO

You have such a way with words, Jolynna!

 

[Foxxtrot]

What kind of defense could he use that is logical? 31 days? I just don't see any excuse for it, or anything logical that will help explain any kind of innocence.

I don't know, something that I can follow along with would be nice. My mind is completely open at this point for both sides to present their case.

 

[MaryAnn]

Guilty, I'll say it 1000 times. I have no doubt in my mind KC did it.