Does Casey Know Who Caylee's Father Is?

[Wise Old Owl]

I think this thread should be changed to "Does the FATHER know he is the father?" Now that is an interesting angle. Dontcha think?

 

[Brini]

According to who the father was...Big time corporate person, famous person, member of the family ... keeping that secrete could cause a mental disconnect between mother child etc.

Because it may help bolster a defense for mental anguish and diminished capacity. Won't get her off but may lessen the overall length of sentence. IMO

Not if the shrink's diagnosis is sociopath. They don't bond. And sociopathy starts in adulthood≥

 

[Brini]

Brings to minds LP's comment about "the shocker"!!

Like LP's comment that the dumpster near LA's aoartment, "Will be critical to the solving of the case." Or, his statement that Caylee was disposed of in Blanchard Park. O love LP, but as another member once put it, "He's a tale-spinner."

 

[Brini]

I can understand why LE would want to know who the father is so that they can rule him out. Cover all their bases.

Actually, they've never searched for the father, nor have they speculated on who he is. It's a segment of the public who is curious, not the law

 

[Jubilee]

Actually, they've never searched for the father, nor have they speculated on who he is. It's a segment of the public who is curious, not the law

Link, please.

 

[Brini]

i think this thread should be changed to "does the father know he is the father?" now that is an interesting angle. Dontcha think?

rofl!

 

[3doglady]

Actually, they've never searched for the father, nor have they speculated on who he is. It's a segment of the public who is curious, not the law

How do you know they never searched for him? When a child goes missing the first thing LE usually does is rule out both parents.

 

[Brini]

How do you know they never searched for him? When a child goes missing the first thing LE usually does is rule out both parents.

No statements by LE. No requests for information in any of the interrogations. No appeals by LE for the father to step forward. No massive DNA exclusions of all of KCs make friends.

He's been gone for over three years. He hasn't been around since conception.

Most of all, they knew who did if, "from day one." ;-)

How would he be relevant to the case?

 

[Brini]

How do you know they never searched for him? When a child goes missing the first thing LE usually does is rule out both parents.

Not if the father has never been around, since conception. And is not on the birth cert.

The parents are the first to be ruled out IF they have been involved in the child's life.

 

[Wise Old Owl]

No statements by LE. No requests for information in any of the interrogations. No appeals by LE for the father to step forward. No massive DNA exclusions of all of KCs make friends.

He's been gone for over three years. He hasn't been around since conception.

Most of all, they knew who did if, "from day one." ;-)

How would he be relevant to the case?

Actually day 31 - if you want to be PC.

I would think even the A's family would want the father ID'd as it now gives them one more person to throw under the wheels of the bus.

 

[Brini]

My prediction is that during the trial, the ONLY DNA that will be of interest is the DNA on the duct tape, and in the trunk.

 

[Brini]

Actually day 31 - if you want to be PC.

I would think even the A's family would want the father ID'd as it now gives them one more person to throw under the wheels of the bus.

Nope. I agree with another poster who opined that the As wanted total control of Caylee. That's why CA disliked the Grunds. The didn't want to share her with another family.

Also, they can't throw anyone under a bus who has not shown any interest in the child, EVER.

This especially if the dad lives, say, in Canada.

 

[3doglady]

No statements by LE. No requests for information in any of the interrogations. No appeals by LE for the father to step forward. No massive DNA exclusions of all of KCs make friends.

He's been gone for over three years. He hasn't been around since conception.

Most of all, they knew who did if, "from day one." ;-)

How would he be relevant to the case?

LE did ask CA who the father was. If they found out who the father is they would not need DNA exclusions. We do not know everyone they talked to about the father or what they discovered. If LE did not investigate how would they know he is not alive or that the defense will not cast doubt on his involvement during the trial. In a case with this much publicity I would think LE would want all their Is dotted and Ts crossed. I have no clue who the father is, but I hope LE does.

 

[Wise Old Owl]

Nope. I agree with another poster who opined that the As wanted total control of Caylee. That's why CA disliked the Grunds. The didn't want to share her with another family.

Also, they can't throw anyone under a bus who has not shown any interest in the child, EVER.

This especially if the dad lives, say, in Canada.

The Grunds area a moot point here as there is official proof he's not the father. Plus, IIRC it was JG that asked for the paternity test and I think that pizzed the A's off because they were looking for a "daddy" and thought they had one. Especially one CA THOUGHT she could control right along with KC (remember CA's rules of the house?)

As for throwing people under the bus, AH never really showed an "interest" in Caylee but was promptly thrown under by CA in her interview. Now, all the speculating about the MR - and he never even met Caylee.

 

[Brini]

I remember this as well but it doesn't make any sense. They need the mother's dna, the father's dna and Caylee's dna to determine who the father is!

Well, they can certainly determine who is, in general.

For instance, on ID, there was a serial rapist identified by witnesses as "White." DNA pointed to a Black-American Indian.

 

[Brini]

LE did ask CA who the father was. If they found out who the father is they would not need DNA exclusions. We do not know everyone they talked to about the father or what they discovered. If LE did not investigate how would they know he is not alive or that the defense will not cast doubt on his involvement during the trial. In a case with this much publicity I would think LE would want all their Is dotted and Ts crossed. I have no clue who the father is, but I hope LE does.

They needed DNA exclusions re: the crime scenes. I know they took AL and JGs for that reason.

 

[Brini]

Too bad they didn't have a video of Cindy beating him with a hammer in the car on the way home.

I just snorted my coffee!

 

[Brini]

maybe this idea belongs here for consideration.... Ann Coulter now.

Honey, I can't see any conspiracy, here.

The case is pretty cut and dried.

 

[radio]

Honey, I can't see any conspiracy, here.

The case is pretty cut and dried.

Sweetheart, lol, I found this post not too far away. The thread can't get much crazier and maybe getting off topic will produce results.

After the body has been found, identified - can't believe stuff like that...:bang:

 

[Brini]

Sweetheart, lol, I found this post not too far away. The thread can't get much crazier and maybe getting off topic will produce results.

After the body has been found, identified - can't believe stuff like that...:bang:

Darling,... you're right! It's pretty whacked. Dumb, crazy crime. Family that DEFINATLEY takes the "fun" out of "dysfunctional."

I meant the crime was easy to solve. :blowkiss: DOES make the OJ murders look mundane, though!;-)

I keep expecting Coulter to whinney, and stamp a hoof, though. ;-)