Lots of snipping for length here, just commenting on a few points:
Heard it said that Cindy cannot accept the fact that she gave birth to a Psycopath.
I don't think it's so much that she gave birth to her, but rather that she thinks this all reflects badly on her as a parent.
GA keeps mentioning someone else was involved. FOR GOD'S SAKE, WHO GA? Why is it so unbelievable that Casey couldn't have done this by herself? GRRRRRRR.
I've always entertained the possibility that someone else was involved, although I can't say that believe that completely. You would think that Casey would have thrown them under the bus if that were the case, but then she'd have to be admitting to her own involvement to do that.
CA says FCA should not have put Caylee in the woods but what were the A's going to do any way, Caylee was already dead.
I don't really understand that part, or its context. I'll have to wait and see what a full transcript says or watch a replay to see her exact words. That part is confusing.
In the beginning when they're talking about George's gambling and deceptive ways, Dr. Phil makes a comment to Cindy about how she makes excuses or enables people in her life who do bad things, and she SMILED !!! and said "YES I DO!" with a sort of smile and giggle, as if it was something to be proud of! Did anybody else catch that? She was almost bragging and trying to make it seem like she's OH such an angel for forgiving people their faults.
I saw that yesterday, and I thought she was smiling not to the enabling/excusing part but to the part about her always wanting to see the good in people. That was part of that same comment by Dr Phil. I can see how she would think that's a good thing.
CA says Caylee did not die in the woods. She still is not sure what happened. Has prayed for 3yrs. When the verdict came in CA finally got her answer. It was an accident. God would never have let FCA walk if it was something sinister.
I know some religious people who think that God controls every single thing that happens in the world, and that would include this verdict. I've never gotten the impression that Cindy's particularly religious, and she didn't say anything else about that part of her life in what I saw yesterday, but I think it's something she could latch onto to convince herself that it really was an accident.
So going by only that, first I'd like to say, "there sure were a lot of commercials". I feel "DR" Phil did not follow through on most of his questions, I feel he could have asked more important questions, such as why did the A's destroy the car, why is the pool still up, how coluld you leave your Granddaughter in the swamp for 6 months, how do you bring your Granddaughter home from the hospital as a new born, have her live in your home for over 2 years and then not know where she is for over 31 days, it just seems there are more important questions then learning about tumors and seizures. "DR" Phil could have asked more imporant questions. Maybe he will today on his entertainment show.
Agreed about the commercials. They always do that on the big-ratings interviews, and it irritates me. And then when they come back from commercial they replay part of what they already showed. They could show more if they didn't do that. And I also agree that he isn't exactly asking any questions that really matter, in the sense that the answers give new info or insight. It's been kind of like a rehashing of what most people already know. Still interesting to watch, though.
And after hearing all this, Dr. Phil is still donating to their foundation. Unbelievable.
I've wondered if there's something to the way he phrased the part of his donation... that part about 'when it's officially licensed'. I wondered if he thinks it'll never get off the ground, thus there will be no donation.
Where Caylee "was placed"?
How about thrown, thrown away, tossed.
She wasn't "placed" anywhere, Cindy.
I don't really attach any importance to the word 'placed'. After all, it's used fairly often in cases like these. The prosecutor in the Celina Cass case used it, referring to her body being placed in the water, for example. I think it's a neutral word. Same with a comment made last night about Dr Phil referring to Caylee as 'that child' rather than using her name. It's done often, with no disrespect meant, so I don't see that as a problem, either.