Drew Peterson's Trial *FIFTH WEEK* part two

Status
Not open for further replies.
Trying to get caught up from being gone. Thanks to all for the updates! If help is needed with them today I will be here, just let me know.

Thanks Jackson...I have to leave in about 15 minutes. I'll let you know.
 
Kara Oko ‏@KaraOko
Dr. Baden: "If hair wipes away blood...it leaves a very characteristic, stringy..pattern of blood..
 
Stacy St. Clair ‏@StacyStClair
Baden disputes #drewpeterson experts' claim that mark on Savio buttock was a "drying artifact." "That's an abrasion," he says.

Kara Oko ‏@KaraOko
Dr. Baden: "in my opinion that is a typical abraison, caused by rubbing...of skin away - it is not a post mortem artifact."
 
In Session Dr. Baden is next asked about Dr. DiMaio’s opinion of injuries to Savio’s clavicle. He is shown a photograph of that area. “This is the first incision in an autopsy . . . in an autopsy, two incisions are made . . . “ The parties approach the bench for a sidebar.

In Session The sidebar ends. “The hand is up by the chin . . . the first incision made in an autopsy is a Y-shaped incision . . . one reason to do this is to show the Adam’s apple, in the center . . .there’s no evidence of hemorrhage, of strangulation.” The defense objects, and asks for a sidebar.
 
Baden says pattern of injuries to Savio's left side had to be from a 'series of falls' not just one...:yesss:
 
#drewpeterson Baden says he disagrees w/ Savio's diagnosis of 'orthostatic hypertension' & it would not cause a person to pass out....
 
Baden also disagrees w/ DiMaio's opinion about Savio's injuries to her diaphragm.
Jury's out after defense objections.:rollercoaster:
 
Kara Oko ‏@KaraOko
Dr. Baden: "If hair wipes away blood...it leaves a very characteristic, stringy..pattern of blood..

Darn. You mean I need to buy cleaning supplies anyway? Crap.
 
BBM
Don't want this to get lost after seeing Brodsky and Lopez on IS this morning and the press conference with the entire DT after court yesterday was shown this morning. Just more proof that the DT will lie through any orifice. They certainly are a collective piece of work. And that's about the nicest thing I can say about that.

Thanks for this, I hadn't seen it.
:seeya:
 
Jurors out of the courtroom during discussion of objection. Defense argues line of questioning isn't a direct rebuttal.

[ whaaaaaa...whaaaaaa...whaaaaaaaaa]
 
[How is it NOT a direct rebuttal? He says I don't agree with this opinion..and I don't agree with that opinion....that is the definition of REBUTTAL witness.]
 
:seeya: Good Morning Y'all !

Could someone please give me an update from the past 2 days of the trial ? THANKS !

I have not had electricity since Tuesday afternoon because of the Hurricane, so I have limited battery for my notebook computer here ... I will be able to read some, but am limited while I am waiting to get somewhere to re-charge.

Oh, one more request : Did the jury wear color-coordinated clothing yesterday Wed. ? Last I read, they wore red/white/blue on Tuesday.

THANKS so much !

:please:

:seeya:
I'm glad you are OK and it is only the power. Hopefully it will be restored soon.:seeya:
 
In Session The sidebar ends. The jurors are excused from the courtroom. Attorney Meczyk objects to this testimony, claiming that this is not proper rebuttal evidence because it actually agrees with what Dr. DiMaio said. Judge: “That’s how I recollect his [DiMaio’s] testimony.” Prosecutor Connor asks for a moment.
 
Baden talks about hemorrhaging in the upper chest & clavicle area. This is fresh hemorrhage in the areas of the chest . . .”

KaraOko: Defense objects, Dr. Baden's testimony is not rebutting specifically to Dr. DiMaio's testimony; sidebar, jury's pulled out,
 
Well, it is rebuttal to one of the DT's experts. Too late anyway because the jury already heard it.

*Oh, I see that it is in agreement with the PT's experts.
 
In Session Connor responds, says that the transcript he has of Dr. DiMaio’s testimony does not reflect that DiMaio’s and Baden’s testimony are saying the same thing. Judge Burmila questions the prosecutor, grilling him on the relevance of Baden’s testimony in this area. Ultimately, the judge says he will allow the testimony. However, before the witness can retake the stand, the State concedes that no report from Baden to that effect was ever made available to the defense. The judge then sends for the jury.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
250
Guests online
540
Total visitors
790

Forum statistics

Threads
625,777
Messages
18,509,729
Members
240,842
Latest member
comric_ele
Back
Top