Drew Peterson's Trial *FOURTH WEEK*
- Thread starter Kimster
- Start date
- Status
In Session Darryl Goldberg begins his cross-examination. “Do you have a vivid recollection as you sit here of June 3, 2003, when you did this physical?” “Just what’s written on the chart.” “You’re really just relying on a habit?” “I’m going purely by what’s written over here.” “Fair to say when your patients come to see you, their medical condition or symptoms can change rather quickly?” “It’s possible.” “People’s weight can fluctuate?” “Yes.” “Her cholesterol would go up and down?” “Correct.” “She had a history of high cholesterol?” “Correct.” “The cholesterol medication caused some aches and pains, and at one point she stopped that?’ “There’s no way to prove or disprove it…so she stopped it, to see if that went away…we always will consider it.” “There was a time when her cholesterol level rose, and you made a note to make sure she was actually taking the medication?” “It was borderline high.” “You first saw her on May 8, 1992?” “Yes.” “You understand she weighed 124 pounds on that date?” “Correct.” “And the last time you saw her she weighed 136 pounds?” “Yes.” “You just had this one phone call in Oct., when she asked you for a prescription for Zoloft, because she couldn’t’ get a hold of Dr. Neri?’ “Yes.”
LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 30
anic: I can't do it as I am on call at work and get interrupted a lot.
Jackson to the resue. lol Thanks
In Session “When Ms. Savio passed, she weighed 154 pounds . . . that would be a significant weight gain that you would be concerned about?” “If she stated she did nothing out of the usual, then it would be significant. But people do change their habits.”
Watch this thread for live updates from the Drew Peterson murder trial!
Judge Burmila is back on the bench. The defense has argued that the State should not have shown a photograph that it did during its examination of Dr. Case. The prosecution offers to crop the photo if it is used again. The judge says the photo was relevant to the witness’ testimony, and not overly prejudicial to the defendant. “I understand the defendant’s objection . . . but that objection is overruled.”
Judge Burmila is back on the bench. The defense has argued that the State should not have shown a photograph that it did during its examination of Dr. Case. The prosecution offers to crop the photo if it is used again. The judge says the photo was relevant to the witness’ testimony, and not overly prejudicial to the defendant. “I understand the defendant’s objection . . . but that objection is overruled.”
LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 30
:skip::skip::skip: Yeah....yippie....
I think I got this from the wrong place.
In Session “She never came to you when she fell down the stairs in October of 1999?” “Based on my records, no.” “So you have no recollection of that?” “No.” “You do know of her complaints to Dr. Neri, her neurologist?” “After reading the records, yes.” “Dr. Neri said Ms. Savio came to see him because in April , 1999 she developed numbness in her left arm?” “That’s what the records reveal.” “And the blood tests revealed that she had some kind of arthritic condition?” “That’s right.”
n Session The witness is shown a medical record that was previously shown to earlier witness Dr. Gene Neri. “”You recognize this as a letter from Dr. Neri, dated April 3, 1999?” “Yes.” “’She feel very unsteady in her gait’…that’s the symptom in this letter?” “That’s what she’s reporting to him.” “’Very irritable and slightly depressed’?’ “Yes.” “She made the same complaints to you, about being fatigued?” “If I go by the records, it’s possible…yes, she has on a couple of occasions ticked off the symptom ‘fatigued.’” “Your impression was that she suffered from fatigue on more than one occasion?” “I’ll have to look at the records; please bear with me…” “Let’s just finish up with Dr. Neri’s letter…if you flip back to it in your file . . . she also had some pain in her feet, particularly in the mornings?” “Correct.” “And there’s a strong family history of diabetes and high cholesterol?” “Yes.” “And her sleep is described as ‘horrible’?” “Yes.” “The reason you discuss family history is that it signifies that some people are more likely than others to suffer from a specific disease?” “That’s correct.”
In Session “She talked about the pain on the left side of her chest that she was having?” “According to the record, she complained of chest pain often.” “In 1993, she had left side chest pain?” “Yes.” “And that’s when a murmur was detected?” “September 2, 1993…I found the murmur.” “Now let’s go to Jan. 30, 1995…there’s again left chest soreness that was her complaint to you?” “Yes.” “There came a time when you were asked about the murmur, when you sent her out for an echocardiogram?” “That’s correct.” “Because she had some sort of chest abnormality, it wasn’t a perfect test?” “Yes, it does say that.’"
bingo
LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 30
Or she found out that "dreamboat" she married was actually a garbage barge. She certainly was stressed and we all know that now. jmo
Anyone know why defense is questioning first and not the State?????
BBM
Could be defense's witness?
I'm sure all of the symptoms just listed were due to stress, depression, fear for her life, and constant harassment of the jerk. (Been there.) You will literally feel like you are going to die when there is that much crap going on. You will also think you are going crazy, you just can't believe it is real. Abuser knows that and mocks you to be sure you feel that way.
lorann
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2003
- Messages
- 2,934
- Reaction score
- 5
also one who is thrown into walls, knocked down stairs, beatings, and all of the things she finally told her family that she had endured while married to DP. That's gotta take a toll on mental and physical health.
- Status
Similar threads
Online statistics
- Members online
- 57
- Guests online
- 1,879
- Total visitors
- 1,936