- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,437
- Reaction score
- 703,791
Where was the bruise he's saying was to the bone/great amount of force? Buttocks or shins?
I thought it was the buttocks---but it was confusing the way the tweets were coming out, in spurts.
Where was the bruise he's saying was to the bone/great amount of force? Buttocks or shins?
He knows the system. He used it well.
WOW. Thank you for posting this link.
Interesting. The first ME put the Time of death as : 11:17 pm Mar 1st, 2004
How the heck did he figure out the TOD to the minute?
Also, he lists all of the bruises, but I see no mention of them being old or new bruises.
We should all take a quick look-see at this 2004 autopsy. Because I think the defense is going to rely heavily upon it in their cross.
Re: Autopsy Report File.
With out being a doctor and understanding all the medical lingo, can someone help me decipher the diagnosis section?
All I could get from it was there was water in the sinuses. Was water found any where else, at least in the lungs?
Thanks, Ruby.
I hope the jurors don't fall for the defense tactic of breaking up the flow of the testimony with their multiple objections.
And poor Ralph Meczyk ... who lost control and randomly shouted objection when he had none. I guess he just wanted to be part of the team.
Sidebars for Wednesday, August 15th
Defense - 7
Proscutors - 2
Judge - 4
Total = 13
:seeya:
Sidebars for Wednesday, August 15th
Defense - 7
Proscutors - 2
Judge - 4
Total = 13
:seeya:
There are no new bruises to the decedent." Nowhere did Mitchell state that in his autopsy report. #drewpeterson
AymaMuse: RT @facsmiley: Because Coroner O'Neil told them this: "There are 6 or there are 7 other bruises noted...all of which are old.
=====================================================
Someone on the DREWPETERSONTRIAL site is tweeting the above info.
Is that correct? Did the original ME say the bruises were old?