Drew to be on A Moment of Truth show?

  • #21
I watched it last night. They would never convince me that DP was being "truthful" since they only show them after they take the LD test. For the ratings it would create, they could "for entertainment purposes only" rig the show for DP, imo.
 
  • #22
I haven't seen this show, has it started airing already?

Maybe the police could *hint* to the producers some basic questions (about timeline and such) in the beginning.

I totally believe that FOX would go through with the show. The amount of attention this would generate would = lots of adverting dollars.

P.s.-Seriously Searching, I am in total agreement with you. There was no $25,000. Just him explaining away her not using her cards.

I disagree. I doubt that the legal department of FOX would allow it; they know there's an investigation going on and I doubt they would want to be dragged into it in any way shape or form, or accused of tainting it. Think about it. Whatever the outcome, it's bound to influence any potential jurors out there who see it.
 
  • #23
I watched it last night. They would never convince me that DP was being "truthful" since they only show them after they take the LD test. For the ratings it would create, they could "for entertainment purposes only" rig the show for DP, imo.

Oh, I wouldn't want to watch that. I want to see his face and his body language when they are asking the questions!:mad:

Do you think Dr. Phil could convince him to come on his show and take a ld test?
 
  • #24
That gambler guy was funny. I bet he got reamed by his girlfriend for the "Have you ever made a move on one of your girlfriends friends" that he answered yes too!

The girl was kind of annoying and they asked her stupid questions. What sisters don't get jealous of each other. I did feel sorry for her Mom when they asked if she thought her Mom should lose weight though.

Anyway, I've just totally hijacked the purpose of this thread so I'll shut up now. LOL
 
  • #25
I disagree. I doubt that the legal department of FOX would allow it; they know there's an investigation going on and I doubt they would want to be dragged into it in any way shape or form, or accused of tainting it.

How would allowing DP to go on their game show any different than DP being interviewed on one of their shows?
 
  • #26
Moment of truth, or, has it occured to anyone the MO here is to infest the potential jury pool? I can't imagine any other reason for the two to play this silly media game.


jmo...... as I see visions of Chuck Berris and Jaye P Morgan. If it could only be that easy. GONG!
 
  • #27
That gambler guy was funny. I bet he got reamed by his girlfriend for the "Have you ever made a move on one of your girlfriends friends" that he answered yes too!

The girl was kind of annoying and they asked her stupid questions. What sisters don't get jealous of each other. I did feel sorry for her Mom when they asked if she thought her Mom should lose weight though.

Anyway, I've just totally hijacked the purpose of this thread so I'll shut up now. LOL

Start another thread, in the jury room! ha ha (I want to know more about this show!)
 
  • #28
  • #29
Moment of truth, or, has it occured to anyone the MO here is to infest the potential jury pool? I can't imagine any other reason for the two to play this silly media game.


jmo...... as I see visions of Chuck Berris and Jaye P Morgan. If it could only be that easy. GONG!

Definitely. I posted that very thing myself.
 
  • #30
How would allowing DP to go on their game show any different than DP being interviewed on one of their shows?

Because with a lie detector there is the presumption that the responses are factual.
 
  • #31

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
112
Guests online
21,833
Total visitors
21,945

Forum statistics

Threads
633,379
Messages
18,640,883
Members
243,512
Latest member
PJ Is Really tired
Back
Top