UK Eliza & Henrietta Huszti, sisters both 32, CCTV captures them near a river at 2am, Aberdeen, 7 Jan 2025.

[Izzylizzy]

Less around £5k for NI and Tax to get to take home pay. Its enough to save something.

In dollars please.
I tried with no success.

 

[Izzylizzy]

I can only assume when she got there it was obvious something was up rather than them just having gone out. Or perhaps the exchange of messages had already raised concerns?

Exactly.
No ones talking.

 

[JennieM]

Do we know if they were both still employed when they gave their notice to their landlady?

 

[Moonchild90]

If true and they did end their lives I can't get my head around the Dee River being the way they chose to carry it out.
Why didn't they jump off the bridge they crossed?

They just really seem like a very private people, probably didn't want to draw any attention or making noises and being caught on CCTV while doing it

 

[Doric Loon]

Look closer (left hand) initially I thought she was shielding her face, but now I think she is talking on the phone.

Personally don’t think she is talking on her phone. Hand on bag strap, or hand in pocket depending on which sister you are talking about.

 

[Binx26]

Or correct me if i'm wrong, is there an embankment on the other side of the river they could have gone now - it might not have been a path, but wild to walk past that, walk over the bridge (they could have jumped from) and turn down that path.

Yes, they could have entered the river from the other side. I know it has been noted there is a road there but I doubt it would have been very busy at 2am. There are trees beside the road and the river is lower down, so I doubt you would be seen, even if there was more lighting. I actually think you might be more shielded from sight of the road entering the river there than the other side at the path?

They seemed to be heading clearly for the path and (from info we have available) headed straight over the bridge. Which keeps leading me back to them meeting someone there.

 

[TonnnnUK]

TBH, my partner and I rent out a duplex, and if we heard that one of our tenants wanted to leave the unit, and was leaving money for one or more months into the future, my immediate concern would be that the unit is damaged in some way, and the tenant either A) thinks what they left will cover costs of the damage or B) has a guilty conscience and left what they can or C) may be having a mental health crisis/thinking of suicide (feeling like they may be a burden on the landlord and so paying to cover the time it will take the landlord to fill the unit). Either way, we’d be headed to see the unit in the next couple days… but the early morning hours are still weird to me.
MOO

Has it been mentioned about the date/time the landlady reported it to the police?

The official line seemed to be they were reported missing as they left their home and didn't return. Early on in the thread that led me to believe maybe the landlord was one who lived in the same property.

It's transpired amongst some media reports since that it's actually a landlady, and they made the discovery of items left and raised the alarm that way.

But I don't think we had an indication of if that was the early morning that they disappeared or later that same day or the day after?

If they had heard from the sisters that they were leaving, it's not that odd if she wanted to go check on things quite soon afterwards.

 

[Grouse]

It is not a mitten. She is clutching something in her right hand. Otherwise she has an incredibly large right hand which I doubt very much.

Yes that goes back to my original thought then - some sort of round object?

Look closer (left hand) initially I thought she was shielding her face, but now I think she is talking on the phone.

I'm assuming you mean the one on the left and I still can't see it, looks like her left hand is in her pocket.

However the one on the right could possibly have a phone in her right hand (or it could be the hem of her coat I'm seeing).

Edited to add: yes I do see what you mean now - the left hand of the sister on the right?

 

[Bigditch]

Yes that goes back to my original thought then - some sort of round object?



I'm assuming you mean the one on the left and I still can't see it, looks like her left hand is in her pocket.

However the one on the right could possibly have a phone in her right hand (or it could be the hem of her coat I'm seeing).

Edited to add: yes I do see what you mean now - the left hand of the sister on the right?

The sister wearing the blue coat.

 

[TMich6811]

Also re: family denying - they also didn’t know about the ending of

Yes, they could have entered the river from the other side. I know it has been noted there is a road there but I doubt it would have been very busy at 2am. There are trees beside the road and the river is lower down, so I doubt you would be seen, even if there was more lighting. I actually think you might be more shielded from sight of the road entering the river there than the other side at the path?

They seemed to be heading clearly for the path and (from info we have available) headed straight over the bridge. Which keeps leading me back to them meeting someone there.

or the boat club which is the direct path

 

[TMich6811]

taking out some of the pixels. I don’t think she is on phone

 

[Macha]

Yes that goes back to my original thought then - some sort of round object?



I'm assuming you mean the one on the left and I still can't see it, looks like her left hand is in her pocket.

However the one on the right could possibly have a phone in her right hand (or it could be the hem of her coat I'm seeing).

Edited to add: yes I do see what you mean now - the left hand of the sister on the right?

The sister on the left has her left hand in her pocket and is holding something round in her right hand.
The sister on the right has her left hand on the strap of her handbag.

 

[marloweclover]

If they saw something ahead on the road that they didn't want to get closer to -- questionable people, vehicle, transaction, altercation -- might they have taken the path as a detour, intending to rejoin the road at the end? Is that entire stretch of road on camera, such that whatever they could have seen would be also seen by police reviewing it, or could it have been off camera such that no one would have observed it unless they were also there at that moment?

 

[ScotAng]

In dollars please.
I tried with no success.

Just google, GBP to USD
(Great British Pound)

£5000 = $6120
 
Amounts mentioned earlier:
£20.5k = $25100
£40k = $48970

 

[Sam_1]

Everything suggests they went into the river: they walk through the town centre where all the cctv can see them and they turn into the dirt track near the river, they tell their landlord they are ending the tenancy, they are walking alone very late at 2am in the morning.

So it all indicates entering the water right, and perhaps washed away to the sea..

But what if, that is what they wanted us to think. Now that would be very interesting.

 

[TonnnnUK]

Yes, they could have entered the river from the other side. I know it has been noted there is a road there but I doubt it would have been very busy at 2am. There are trees beside the road and the river is lower down, so I doubt you would be seen, even if there was more lighting. I actually think you might be more shielded from sight of the road entering the river there than the other side at the path?

They seemed to be heading clearly for the path and (from info we have available) headed straight over the bridge. Which keeps leading me back to them meeting someone there.

Have come back to this theory a few times.

If their intentions are to enter the water, in my mind, you need to prepare for it. I know that side of the river has some steps down to the water for the boat club. Ease of access. They could have taken alcohol and tablets in the bag. Sat at the steps to consume those and enter the water as they began to feel drowsy.
It's more out of sight than the main road side and the bridge itself. Less likely for anyone to intervene.

 

[TMich6811]

The boat club is pretty well covered with cameras so while it may not have fully gotten them if they went that far, it seems likely they were caught on camera in some capacity if they got that far

 

[lamberta]

Or correct me if i'm wrong, is there an embankment on the other side of the river they could have gone now - it might not have been a path, but wild to walk past that, walk over the bridge (they could have jumped from) and turn down that path.

You are 100% correct. They ventured to the path they were on for a reason.

 

[Cardgame]

What is still strange to me is the fact that the landlady reported them being missing the same day that they left the house at 2am.

How did she know they weren't coming back?

Police said whatever was in the flat did not indicate self harm. But it did make them think the sisters could have come to harm.

The boat club is pretty well covered with cameras so while it may not have fully gotten them if they went that far, it seems likely they were caught on camera in some capacity if they got that far

JMO but seems like they didn't get that far because the police report says they were last seen 'heading in the direction of' the boathouse.

Perhaps those cameras are dummies or not working?

Or they are working but there's no sign of the women captured.

 

[TMich6811]

What is still strange to me is the fact that the landlady reported them being missing the same day that they left the house at 2am.

How did she know they weren't coming back?

Police said whatever was in the flat did not indicate self harm. But it did make them think the sisters could have come to harm.

JMO but seems like they didn't get that far because the police report says they were last seen 'heading in the direction of' the boathouse.

Perhaps those cameras are dummies or not working?

Or they are working but there's no sign of the women captured.

I agree that the likely didn’t make it to the boat club for whatever reason, though I do feel it could have been their destination. I doubt they are dummy cameras.

The whole landlady thing doesn’t make sense because it’s being reported differently and it’s confusing on what actually happened there what seems to be consistent is that there were materials found. Whatever “materials” means