luckyducky
Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
- Messages
- 328
- Reaction score
- 40
Teenage sailor Abby Sunderland set to be rescued http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article7148776.ece
I saw on Abby's blog that there is a button to place a donation through paypal - to help bring back Wildeyes. I guess they are trying to find a way to bring the boat back and salvage it.
He also responded to criticism that Australian taxpayers have had to pay more than $200,000 for their daughter to be rescued.
"The guy from Canberra has come out publicly and said this is what we do and we foot the bill, as if any Australian in foreign waters would be in trouble, the authority in that jurisdiction would also rescue any Australian and also foot the bill," he said.
Abby has finally been rescued:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100612/ap_on_sp_ot/lost_sailor_found
The fact that the captain of the fishing vessel fell into the turbulent ocean and had to be rescued himself proves that these stunts don't just affect the person doing them. What if the captain had died? Would the family have felt so justified then? People can be so self centered they don't even consider the danger they put others in. Praise the Lord she is now safe, and praise the Lord the captain of the ship is also safe, if not very cold. I hope he doesn't get sick, now.
Not to sound callous, but - I'd like donations to bring back my boat, too. The one we sold to pay bills...
Seriously, I think she is one tough kid and she did a fantastic job (aside from the debate about whether or not she should've been out there to begin with). But folks have already spent alot of money to save HER. The Australian govt is not seeking reimbursement. I believe Qantas hasn't said how much the chartered flight cost (may not bill for it?). She had TONS of corporate sponsorship as well. I think it's time to let the boat go.
To quote her father from ABC in Australia:
I think one thing to keep in mind is that Abby did not fail, her boat has failed her. First the autopilots, now the dismasting. I do not believe any of this reflects on her sailing ability or her young age, but rather poor choice in boat which her parents and "Team Abby" played a large hand in choosing. A heavy, solid cruising boat would have been slower and easier to handle in heavy winds. My husband and I were discussing the speed of her ocean racing boat and how it was probably zipping out of control in those conditions.
If she had been in a different boat, I think she probably would be fine. She has made it more than halfway around the world and probably could have made it the rest of the way, if she had a boat as strong as she is.
Thanks, Elphaba - here's another link: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...-dad-signed-reality-doomed-voyage/?test=faces
My perspective on this trip is definitely starting to change... To quote from the above link: "The father of teen sailor Abby Sunderland told The NY Post Sunday that he's broke and had signed a contract to do a reality show, "Adventures in Sunderland," about his family of daredevil kids weeks after she set off on her doomed and dangerous solo sail around the globe."
Belimom! I was kinda thinkin' the same thing! I'm all for Abby and think she is an incredible young woman for being so driven and courageous, but the donations to help bring her boat back didn't sit well with me at all after all the money that was spent for her rescue!
From http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...ling-association/story-e6freuy9-1225879271479
"THE family of US solo sailor Abby Sunderland are seeking public donations to save her crippled boat Wild Eyes from the Indian Ocean,despite claims they don't have the money to compensate the Australian Government for her $300,000 rescue."