- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,966
- Reaction score
- 19,258
Why was this plane allowed to fly? I thought they were still grounded? No passengers okay, but if it crashes, there's plenty of people underneath on the ground. What gives?
I'm guessing there must be some exceptions to grounding orders to allow planes to fly in certain circumstances.Why was this plane allowed to fly? I thought they were still grounded? No passengers okay, but if it crashes, there's plenty of people underneath on the ground. What gives?
Flightaware flight path: Southwest (WN) #8701 ✈ FlightAware
Why was this plane allowed to fly? I thought they were still grounded? No passengers okay, but if it crashes, there's plenty of people underneath on the ground. What gives?
Here's a screenshot from the above link to FlightAware. Just a helpful graphic of how short the flight path was for Southwest 8701
Even if a plane crashed in the US where the authorities could not get to it quickly, there is no way anyone culturally here would even think about looting something like this. In other countries, especially ones where they are so poor, any opportunity to get something to sell is taken. Just a cultural and economic thing I think.
Sometimes the police squads are corrupt too.
Yes. Pilots have been test flying 737 MAXs in my area, between Renton and the newly opened Paine Field.I'm guessing there must be some exceptions to grounding orders to allow planes to fly in certain circumstances.
Yes. Pilots have been test flying 737 MAXs in my area, between Renton and the newly opened Paine Field.
https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle...37-max-7-jets-test-flights-mcas-upgrades.html
I'm on a "wait and see" for now. The planes are grounded so I won't be booked onto a MAX until they're deemed safe and released for carrying passengers.I’m really not looking forward to these planes taking passengers again I have lost confidence in the Boeing Max series aircraft.
The 737 Max is the subject of a criminal investigation and a congressional inquiry.
While Boeing hosts its meetings, lawmakers in Washington are staging a Senate hearing on aviation safety and oversight on Wednesday afternoon. Among those expected to offer testimony are Daniel K. Elwell, acting administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, and Robert Sumwalt, chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board and Calvin L. Scovel III, the Transportation Department’s inspector general.
Boeing will also have to convince a skeptical community of global aviation professionals that the 737 Max will be safe to fly once the flight systems are updated.
Not sure how anyone could guarantee they don’t get a Boeing plane unless the airline you fly with has none. But then , they have partners. And planes are switched all of the time.
If there are issues such as airport closures, you may be booked onto another airline entirely.
Ditch those losers
Boeing announces 737 MAX tech fixes following two fatal air crashes
Boeing says its new fixes make MCAS less powerful and less prone to error, as well as making it easier for the flight crew to monitor whether the sensors that feed MCAS information are accurate.
The company has also proposed extra computer-based training for pilots, although it will not be recommending time in a simulator.
Boeing announces 737 MAX tech fixes following two fatal air crashes
Not good enough in my opinion. How is a pilot supposed to learn about the MCAS fix flight changes on a computer?
I hope they get tons of lawsuits.
I think that’s a certainty and the fact that these fixes are necessary is going to help with the legal process.
That gets complicated. Subsequent remedial measures cannot be used as evidence of negligence. Its a rule of evidence in federal and state courts (in the USA). But there are work arounds on that at times. Air crash litigation is incredibly complicated and there are all sorts of weird rules. It has become its own area of law, with firms specializing in it. Damages are capped at times, I can't even begin to explain because I myself know very little. From a legal standpoint, it will be interesting to see how this plays out. From a practical standpoint, I sure hope Boeing gets this figured out, and changes are made in the plane, and in the FAA.I think that’s a certainty and the fact that these fixes are necessary is going to help with the legal process.
This, to me, is very important. Part of the Lion Air crash issue started because the computer got faulty info that caused the MCAS to kick in when it wasn't needed. Faulty data to the computer is what initiated the Air France 447 disaster. Computer and flight programs are making flying safer. But if the computers are getting faulty info, they can't fly right, and the pilots are left confused and are fighting the computer. So something that better ensures accurate info to the computer is helpful.Boeing announces 737 MAX tech fixes following two fatal air crashes
Boeing says its new fixes make MCAS less powerful and less prone to error, as well as making it easier for the flight crew to monitor whether the sensors that feed MCAS information are accurate.
The company has also proposed extra computer-based training for pilots, although it will not be recommending time in a simulator.
Boeing announces 737 MAX tech fixes following two fatal air crashes
Not good enough in my opinion. How is a pilot supposed to learn about the MCAS fix flight changes on a computer?