"Exhibit C" Cindy and Nejame Emails

[logicalgirl]

I'm wondering, too, if CA does not believe that was Caylee's remains then why didn't they file a police report that someone had broken into their home and stolen the baby's blanket, their SPECIAL duct tape, heart stickers, trash bags, laundry bags and personal items found with the remains. They had no trouble reporting the stolen gas cans.....oh, wait.....that was KC. Well, had no trouble reporting their car was stolen....oh, wait....that was KC, too. Credit cards, money.....all KC's doings. So if this is someone else's child, and they broke into the home to steal the items found with this child to make is look like it was Caylee so KC has to spend all this time in jail only to reveal at trial..surprise, surprise Caylee's not dead so I can go free now. Only problem, there is still a child who is dead..... jmo

Oh Lord - Lambchop - I know this case is sad - but that's clever and very funny! And isn't that just "it" in a nutshell?

 

[Spangle]

Cindy is one of those that thinks if she out yells you, then she is winning the argument. So she out yells, out talks, the other person.. until they just give up and is quiet. To her, that means she has won. Who wins gets to write the history of the event, right?? They certainly expect their 'way' to be followed, since their view 'won.'

IN reality, folks just ignore her. That doesn't mean she 'controls' them. They just learn to tune her out, and do their own thing. I've seen families treat family members this way.

But it doesn't work so much when dealing in the real world. She is not getting the last word. Those dang bloggers. She can't out yell or talk them to death. It doesn't work with them. She thinks she has 'won', but the topic comes up again... and no matter how much she says, yells, threatens.. her version isn't the one everyone says 'won.' Instead, it's been tested by merit. SHOCKER

That is the same suprise that ICA got with her LE interviewed. What she said was verified. Telling a good tale didn't make it a winner. But wither it stood up to verification.

The only control she has, is the ablity to cause those around her to allow her to 'win'. Because of that she writes her own delusions. Example, GA told her that ICA wasn't working. Even told her his proof. She didn't want to believe it, so what would be the point of arguing with her about it??? Not worth it.