It's a rule out condition. It's possible, once again, they are wrong. It's also possible that once a bunch of other tests came back negative they started to suspect somatization.
Is there any way you can think of that BCH is right? At all? Because if you don't, there's really no point to this conversation, as nothing will change your mind.
Nobody is making anyone to converse with me.
What is the point of having this diagnosis if the treatment hasn't improved her condition? If treating or not treating for it makes no difference, how does it justify DCF removing her from her parents?