LolaMoon08
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2008
- Messages
- 7,138
- Reaction score
- 248
He wasn't "armed" with iced tea and skittles. They are not weapons.He was unarmed. Therefore, why mention the tea and skittles in comparison with the 9mm pistol? What about the phone? He was carrying that too but we don't hear that he was "armed" with a phone. Repeatedly mentioning the tea and skittles simply plays on emotions because the candy evokes nostalgia and images of childhood innocence imo.
Because Trayvon going to the store and purchasing skittles for his little brother, and a can of ice tea for himself is an innocent act by a child. One that a child should not be followed, shot, and killed for.