So I reread the article from the opening post. The children were 8, 10, 14 and 15 iirc. When I hear "young children," 8 is kinda the higher range of "young," and I personally wouldn't refer to those kids as "young children." When I first read that I thought preschoolers.Why were there young children at a shooting range ?
When we look at accidental injuries and deaths involving actual children, the numbers are very low. When we expand that look to include homicides by gang-banger "teens" along with suicides, we do get a much bigger number. I have been talking about accidental injuries and deaths involving actual children, which seems to be the "child endangerment" that some people are so concerned about.