- Joined
- May 26, 2013
- Messages
- 431
- Reaction score
- 1,098
I think they resemble one another, but the “tell” for me is AP’s eyes and upper cheeks “smile” when he smiles, while UID does not.
There have been several messages doubting the UID Adam Patterson (Namus ID 42783 at link: Missing Person's Commentary: New to NamUs - Adam Christopher Patterson (MP #42783)) but I am new and got a little carried away. I have found some additional info and pictures that I couldn’t ignore - some of which is admittedly very circumstantial.
Can anyone who has submitted the name to Collier please confirm? I am not really comfortable doing so like some of you more experienced users. Some of you also may quickly be able to debunk my findings.
Here are some photos for comparison:
Mostly Harmless: Imgur
Mostly Harmless collage: https://www.websleuths.com/forums/attachments/adfdff76-9b0d-41e6-af3d-7b5c081946d1-jpeg.143471/
Adam Patterson: Imgur
Of interest to me:
1. AP has very little social media presence - followed less than 100 accounts - but did follow many android/microsoft/google app development accounts - although his professional life did not seem to use it (captain of charter boat/water taxi)
2. Followed a “big” developer from Brooklyn NY, first name Ben, last name not with a B
3. He and most all of his friends are VERY into hiking and camping (several started lifestyle brands in the industry). Can find several trips he was on but not ususally in pictures. Did not see any of the same gear from Mostly Harmless, but that is expected based on the nature of his disappearance
4. There was no visible drop off in normal activity prior to his disappearance other than the news article that said there were marriage “problems” 10 days before disappearance. Was involved in big projects and normal work.
5. Strangely - none of his close friends posted any sort of concern about his disappearance or memorial type stuff. Several, including SO, were out camping with friends just days after.
6. One close family member, 6 months after his disappearance, made a post about going through hard times and asked “What would anyone do if they knew they only had 365 days left to live? Would you tell loved ones, act like nothing was happening, or make a big change?”. The message does not seem to be related to anything else in their own life. (yes major assumption on my part)
7. Looks-wise, there are a few big things for me.
NOSE - The changing of the nose based on different angles - when you compare similar pics it helps. At similar angles the nostrils are very similar.
TEETH - in the pics at the link I posted, the teeth are VERY similar to the “composite”, which we know is very likely a direct photoshop of the body’s actual teeth. The Namus page also notes the quality of his teeth - a good justification for his young age (33) but his otherwise quickly changing appearance probably due to illness.
BEARD - beards are a huge tell for male identities. The pattern of where hair grows on a face does not change quickly, and more “bare” patches below the lips are a big match, as well as more filled in particular areas, like the mustache and directly below the bottom lip. The presence of a beard on his face also changes his general look pretty drastically.
Anyways, I realize a lot of this is probably just me looking for a match and I hope I didn’t break any rules. Both cases really drew me in and I feel like this community is doing a lot of good. Thanks for reading.
There have been several messages doubting the UID Adam Patterson (Namus ID 42783 at link: Missing Person's Commentary: New to NamUs - Adam Christopher Patterson (MP #42783)) but I am new and got a little carried away. I have found some additional info and pictures that I couldn’t ignore - some of which is admittedly very circumstantial. Snipped by coffeeandacig
Adam Patterson is in NAMUS. The Sheriff fb has said in their recent replies to comments on their page that the UID is not anyone in the missing persons databases they have access to, including NAMUS. If the match you are suggesting is in NAMUS it has likely already been ruled out by LE at this point.
Hiya Gardener1850! I have a question, maybe you can answer. If the MP is 2 years younger than the UID age parameters given, will they still be checked against each other?
I wrote above that they likely would not...but I don't know for sure. And I don't want to put out misinformation.
Thanks!!!
As the Sheriff's office seems to be able to rule out possibilities so quickly, I wonder if there is some distinguishing mark or information that hasn't been shared that enables them to rule out so fast...Just a thought and not unheard of for information to be kept from public for identifying purposes
Does a visible "rule out list" still exist on each NAMUS case?
It's OK to let a case get under your skinThere have been several messages doubting the UID Adam Patterson (Namus ID 42783 at link: Missing Person's Commentary: New to NamUs - Adam Christopher Patterson (MP #42783)) but I am new and got a little carried away. I have found some additional info and pictures that I couldn’t ignore - some of which is admittedly very circumstantial.
snipped for brevity
The only rule out showing on NAMUS is Glen Oldfield. Adam had a circular scar on his back and a scar on his cheek.
Coincidentally? they both liked yellow. Harmless had a yellow tent and yellow sleeping bag. Adam wore a yellow tie and in another photo, a yellow tee.
It's OK to let a case get under your skinYour reasoning is very sound and Adam has quite a few obvious box-ticks. For me there is something about the nose that makes him a mis-match with our UID, but of course a nose is a very changeable part of the face.
I think there must be better photos of Adam out there that would allow a fuller comparison...are you able to link to any others? If he is on Namus, and although assumed deceased, I think any SM links would be OK by WS standards?
At the very least, perhaps we can start a thread for Adam...(I will get on it tomorrow unless somebody finds an existing and links it here)
Thanks for checking the ruleout list Classito.
Our unidentified hiker only had a faint scar on his stomach. So the lack of matching scars is another thing that rules Adam out IMO. We have many pictures of the UID, from all angles, so a scar on his cheek would be noticeable. JMO.