Yep, I just now found the video with that. I guess the papers edited it. Imo I think it's much more effective with all of it.
Could you link the video please? I missed that, thought they were done for the day.
Yep, I just now found the video with that. I guess the papers edited it. Imo I think it's much more effective with all of it.
That's was a lot of responsibility for a very sick woman alcohol and drug problems included to cook, run errands and hold down the fort for 10 days especially with your own children bullying you. I don't care if she said "I got it" he knew the problems in that family and what a sick unreliable puppy she was.
She was a train wreck waiting to happen. Didn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out.
She only had good things to say about PS and didn't trash him like some wives would do. I think the only negative comment was when she was in bed 7 weeks and he didn't care.
Could you link the video please? I missed that, thought they were done for the day.
Would them marrying on the sly while she was a subordinate have prevented him from becoming a General? Like it was considered a blemish on his record?
Today it would be very ''uncool'' for an officer to be messing with a subordinate ((lots of trouble)). Usually you have to have permission to marry within the ranks so to speak (folks correct me if I am wrong - am basing this on 2nd hand info). If you have someone reporting to you ((think Clinton Lewinski) it puts the person in charge in an unfair advantage and the optics are all ''wrong''. They got married on the sly ((without permission)) and then she "gave up" her post avoiding the trouble. ((she loses he gains))
I've been looking but can't find anything. Seems like Croaker Queen uses the same feed I was watching today, where at the start of the break they went to a press conference and missed the entire exchange between JS and judge regarding the stipulation.
Lady Justice did not upload anything after the recess for the break prior to the exchange between JS and judge regarding the stipulation.
I'm so frustrated! The only portion I missed isn't available to watch anywhere!! :banghead:
I feel that Parker is in the worst position of all...an adult who's life was formed by the Army and as an adult child of an alcoholic. When I watched Parker on the stand all I could see was a very guarded man. In the Army, and probably all branches of services, I only know about the Army...when you have a family member who is impaired by drug or alcohol addiction, you learn very quickly how to cover up. "Acting normal" becomes the new norm and the pressure is intense. Living on an Army base with a sick family member...especially an officer's family, it is like living under a microscope 24/7. I still have painful, painful memories of those years...stitched in along with the wonderful memories of traveling through Europe, bouncing back and forth, never settling in for very long. I do think he will be blamed by the defense and that, to me, is unfair. I think he lived through hell for a long time, probably much longer than he should have. I also think he probably realizes at night that he should have left her a long time ago and taken the kids with him. I don't think however, that he should shoulder the blame for his children dying on Jan. 27, 2011. That solely belongs to Julie, in my opinion. I am only sure of one thing...this trial has brought back all the painful memories of growing up with an alcoholic with a mental disorder, and the chaos that one person can create. What I saw on the stand was the designated rock of the family...what may have seemed uncaring to some, seemed like a blessing to me. That's why he was so close to those kids. He was the stabilizer in the family. He must feel so lost inside now.
This case has made me cry. It is too sad that Calyx and Beau could not outlive her. They really did seem like wonderful kids.
Link for afternoon video about 15-20 min. From end of video.
http://new.livestream.com/tampabaytimes/events/2979805/videos/50248171
I feel that Parker is in the worst position of all...an adult who's life was formed by the Army and as an adult child of an alcoholic. When I watched Parker on the stand all I could see was a very guarded man. In the Army, and probably all branches of services, I only know about the Army...when you have a family member who is impaired by drug or alcohol addiction, you learn very quickly how to cover up. "Acting normal" becomes the new norm and the pressure is intense. Living on an Army base with a sick family member...especially an officer's family, it is like living under a microscope 24/7. I still have painful, painful memories of those years...stitched in along with the wonderful memories of traveling through Europe, bouncing back and forth, never settling in for very long. I do think he will be blamed by the defense and that, to me, is unfair. I think he lived through hell for a long time, probably much longer than he should have. I also think he probably realizes at night that he should have left her a long time ago and taken the kids with him. I don't think however, that he should shoulder the blame for his children dying on Jan. 27, 2011. That solely belongs to Julie, in my opinion. I am only sure of one thing...this trial has brought back all the painful memories of growing up with an alcoholic with a mental disorder, and the chaos that one person can create. What I saw on the stand was the designated rock of the family...what may have seemed uncaring to some, seemed like a blessing to me. That's why he was so close to those kids. He was the stabilizer in the family. He must feel so lost inside now.
This case has made me cry. It is too sad that Calyx and Beau could not outlive her. They really did seem like wonderful kids.
You must be young. My DH did not get your memo. :seeya:
I just finished catching up! Thank you all for a wonderful job. I saw the part where she still had trouble with the stipulation. She was most certainly (IMHO) being passive-aggressive with the judge.
1. She's very intelligent. Heck, learning to speak Russian fluently enough to be a military translator in interrogations isn't very easy. I'm betting she could still speak Russian even in the worst depression ever.
2. She manipulated her situation with doctors and husband so there could be no helpful collaboration so much needed to help the patient and family to deal with the situation. I'm sure PS must have been frustrated with the number and dosages of her medications. When dealing with medications, a spouse might be able to see that she keeps on her schedule, but only if he knows what it is.
3. She was able to state very clearly that she had "been advised to say yes" which was a lot more sophisticated than just saying yes.
I know I'm being hard on her here, but I will listen clearly to the doctors' testimony both in the defense CIC and the prosecution rebuttal. Perhaps they will change my mind.
I just can't get over the premeditation and stated motive. She did say she was sparing them in there as well. Too bad she just didn't spare herself and let her children deal with their anger at her.
can anyone explain to me what kind of a doctor would listen to a woman repeatedly talking about suicide and then advise he "you better make it on the first try"? Julie said that to the detective and he repeated it back because he could not believe it and I don't either. I want to see this "doc" on the stand...same one that told her 2 drinks okay with meds.
first you have to ADMIT there is an issue and I don't think PS's oversized ego would allow that