D
Deleted member 173651
Guest
Supposed to be a case management hearing at 10:30 but no sign, anyone know anything?
KM plead not guilty. Set trial for end of Feb.
SG's lawyer brought up the indigent issue but judge said he never saw a copy of the motion. It had not been sent to his office, so he could not rule to it. Another case mgmt set for him next month.
KM sat with her back to SG - they were about 4 feet apart. She looked at him once out of the corner of her eye.
KM plead not guilty. Set trial for end of Feb.
SG's lawyer brought up the indigent issue but judge said he never saw a copy of the motion. It had not been sent to his office, so he could not rule to it. Another case mgmt set for him next month.
KM sat with her back to SG - they were about 4 feet apart. She looked at him once out of the corner of her eye.
KM plead not guilty. Set trial for end of Feb.
SG's lawyer brought up the indigent issue but judge said he never saw a copy of the motion. It had not been sent to his office, so he could not rule to it. Another case mgmt set for him next month.
KM sat with her back to SG - they were about 4 feet apart. She looked at him once out of the corner of her eye.
Thank you for the update! I'm actually surprised they brought them into the courtroom together. I was thinking they would keep them separate. Interesting that she wouldn't look at him. Probably because she's going to flip on him, and he knows it.
Two attorneys representing Magbanua did not want to discuss the case because Magbanua will be back in court on Friday for a bond request hearing.
Poor SG. You gotta feel for him a teeny tiny bit. He just can't seem to get anything to go his way.KM plead not guilty. Set trial for end of Feb.
SG's lawyer brought up the indigent issue but judge said he never saw a copy of the motion. It had not been sent to his office, so he could not rule to it. Another case mgmt set for him next month.
KM sat with her back to SG - they were about 4 feet apart. She looked at him once out of the corner of her eye.
I'm thinking a road trip to Tallahassee may be in order.
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
Im not sure KM would qualify for Federal Witness Protection, but she may qualify for protection by the State of Florida:
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes...ing=&URL=0900-0999/0914/Sections/0914.25.html
The 2016 Florida Statutes
914.25 Protective services for certain victims and witnesses.
(1) For purposes of this section, the term:
(a) Victim or witness at risk of harm means a victim or witness who, as a result of cooperating in an investigation or prosecution of a serious felony offense, has been subjected to violence or other forms of intimidation, or who is the subject of a substantial threat to commit violence. The term also includes a member of the victims or witnesss immediate family.
(b) Serious felony offense means one of the following offenses, including an attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit one of the following offenses: murder, manslaughter, sexual battery, aggravated stalking, aggravated battery, carjacking, home invasion robbery, burglary, arson, robbery, kidnapping, racketeering, or trafficking in a controlled substance.
(2) A law enforcement agency is hereby authorized to provide protective services, including temporary relocation services, to a victim or witness at risk of harm. Protective and temporary relocation services, as deemed appropriate, shall be provided pursuant to the provisions of this section.
(3)(a) The statewide prosecutor, any state attorney, or any law enforcement officer may identify a victim or witness as a victim or witness at risk of harm. Upon such identification, the statewide prosecutor, the state attorney, or the law enforcement officer must notify either the statewide prosecutor or the state attorney who has jurisdiction over the criminal investigation or prosecution, if necessary.
(b) The statewide prosecutor or the state attorney, as appropriate, may determine whether an identified victim or witness at risk of harm is critical to a criminal investigation or prosecution. If the victim or witness at risk of harm is deemed critical, the statewide prosecutor or the state attorney may:
1. Certify that the victim or witness receive protective services; or . . .
http://www.wctv.tv/content/news/Pro...records-in-Markel-murder-case--390758422.html"What they are doing is they're speculating based on what their theory is and they're engaging in a fishing expedition," Magbanua's attorney Tara Kawass told the judge Friday.
[h=1]Prosecutors seek breast augmentation records in Markel murder case[/h]
Prosecutors told the judge Friday they believe Charles Adelson paid for Magbanua to get a breast augmentation in October 2014. That's about three months after Markel's murder.
They told the judge a witness claims Adelson paid half the cost of the $6000- $7000 procedure.
"If Charlie Adelson paid for it, that would be very significant in a homicide investigation where there's a conspiracy between him and Miss Magbanua," prosecutor Anna Norris argued.
I'm a heterosexual woman, but my eyes couldn't help but zero in on CA's gifts to her in those pics, quite prominent even through her modest jail jumpsuit.
Regarding the bond hearing for her on Friday.....I'm sure she'd really like to be home with her children for Christmas. Would granting a reasonable bond be part of a plea deal maybe?
Regarding the bond hearing for her on Friday.....I'm sure she'd really like to be home with her children for Christmas. Would granting a reasonable bond be part of a plea deal maybe?