- Joined
- Jan 22, 2024
- Messages
- 812
- Reaction score
- 2,309
As far as I’m concerned you and I have been vindicated. We are right.
The state doesn’t have enough evidence to take Wendi to trial. There isn’t enough evidence to prove up that Wendi conspired and furthered Danny’s murder. Period!
But,
Stay tuned, I guess.
Yes… and what surprises me is that there still seems to be a reluctance on social media to publicly state the obvious. I believe many more people have quietly come to terms with the reality that the case against her is a crapshoot. I’m sure plenty are hesitant to express that opinion in a public forum for a variety of reasons. In many spaces, you’re treated like the “enemy” or accused of being against justice for Dan Markel if you share this view. In the past, if you said anything like this, you were accused of being on the Adelson payroll or PR team, being in love with Wendi, not knowing the case details, or simply being naive.
I’m fully willing to change my opinion if someone can outline how the state can prove that Wendi either entered into a conspiratorial agreement or committed an act in furtherance of the crime without relying on speculation or some variant of the “it’s the whole of the parts…. too many coincidences” argument. I would be happy to be proven wrong.
