GUILTY FL - FSU Law Professor Dan Markel Murdered by Hitmen 18 July 2014 - *5 Guilty* #28

[apeXperience]

In the murder of Dan Markel, the Theory of the Crime from the Probable Cause Affidavits of Sigfredo Gracia 2016, Charles Adelson 2016 (from which ex State Attorney Meggs refused to act upon), and Katherine Magbanua 2016 goes thus:

1) State labeled co-conspirator Wendi has the most (multiple) motives to move her
2) short tempered and revengeful father Harvey toward mobilizing his financial assets along with his
3) domestic coordinator Donna and his
4) capo regime Charles.

From there, whipped by his mother’s motive of controlling the lives of people around her, and his own propensity “to serve the family by the ways of his father, no matter what”, as opposed to the naive honest way of his older brother “abbot Robert”, maestro Charles recruited his sex toy Magbanua along her babies’ daddy Sigfredo and the Latin King crown member Luis Rivera to make the crime happens.

As 4 trials leading to 4 convictions of Murder to the First Degree and 4 LWOP sentences developed, Donna looks like a master mind because of her “domestic coordinator” role. Also, “domestic coordination” requires actions and communications, which resulted with numerous evidences against Donna and Charles.

As a result, the 1) true master mind and the 2) “birthday present collector” and financier are still at large … waiting for the sword of Damocles to fall and bring More Justice for Dan Markel!

 

[Zedzded]

Why did Sara Yousef not testify in DA's trial. DA had stated to SY something denigratory about DanM, which would have completely contradicted her narrative that DanM was someone she dearly loved.

 

[nhmemorymaker]

I agree the case against WA is not like CA And DA. CA practically talked himself right into a conviction. The Dolce Tape, especially the enhanced audio, was powerful evidence. He procured the third party arranger (KM). He paid. DA wrote the checks. She did the money drop to CA. She also talked herself right into conviction on numerous wiretaps and “oops! Accidentally recorded” phone calls. Basically, CA and DA are a couple wannabe crime masterminds with mouths as wide as the Mississippi River. WA? No money drop. No blabbering on recorded phone calls dropping “code words”. None of the conspirators testifying to tell her role in the plot (yet). Absolutely nothing from the wire tickle that nailed KM, CA, and DA.

Is there lots of “coincidences” that suggest she likely was aware of a plot to kill Dan? Sure seems to be. Is there circumstantial evidence that hints at ways she may have been involved in the plot? I think so. However, based on what I know from the evidence against her, I think conviction in a court, following the statutes and instructions the jury will receive, I think it’s iffy for a conviction.(and I’ve followed this case since the day Dan was shot. I lived in Southwood Subdivision at the time and was near the end of a 32 year residence in the Tallahassee area).

I’m fully aware that the State may have evidence about which I know nothing. If that evidence is compelling and makes conviction probable, then what’s the hold up? Justice delayed is Justice denied.

I still think that the State believes they need something more, and likely that something more will come from someone’s mouth. No SOL for murder, so hope for a flip or a slip while LE is listening.

MOO. Regards! F_M

Well stated, @Florida_marlin ... they are just missing "the clincher"
I’m fully aware that the State may have evidence about which I know nothing. If that evidence is compelling and makes conviction probable, then what’s the hold up? Justice delayed is Justice denied.