As for the prosecution’s appetite for such a deal, the biggest unknown (to us) right now is the quality and breadth of undisclosed evidence that they have against WA. For example, we know nothing about whether they have potential testimony from her lunch friends, the TV repairman, someone at the boys’ school who could have taken a phone call from her to confirm the boys’ location, or others as yet unidentified. They also may have evidence in WA’s electronic communications that there was no reason to disclose in previous trials. I think they have a stronger case against WA than is generally assumed by us watchers. Stronger, yes. Strong enough not to deal, who knows?