- Joined
- May 29, 2020
- Messages
- 3,127
- Reaction score
- 32,990
He should just take her phone away!
I think judge will allow her back in because she's Dan's mom. JMO.I hope she has attorneys or people there who can advocate for her and get her back in.
How is he going to get those text messages in? Do they exist? Wouldn’t he show them to this guy if they existed? Did he buy camera equipment?Rushbaum: ' Are you aware that in the next few weeks( after the murder) that Charlie spent $3K on camera equipment for his house? ( Rash claims that's in Charlie text messages)
And this helps the defense why? Of course they felt bad for them. They had just lost their father. It’s not going to be a picnic.Rashbaum: ' Are you aware that in the next few weeks( after the murder) that Charlie spent $3K on camera equipment for his house? ( Rash claims that's in Charlie text messages)
Rashbaum: texts you haven't included Mr Corbett
Rashbaum gives an example, as below:
21st July at 12pm CA to Donna or Harvey as the latter are leaving Tally.
CA ' I feel so bad for them'
DA: ' we just have to be strong & supportive, they need family right now, just got in car now'
Of course! It was a surprise party! Not a murder! “I’m sure you’ll come through.” With the paella. (Psst…Murderers don’t put their murder plans in a text.)Rash now raises the March texts about the birthday gift
Rash says that while Donna tells him to delete the text he doesn't do that
![]()
FL - FSU Law Professor Dan Markel Murdered by Hitmen *3 guilty* #15
I’m just not used to my family being that caring or concerned about my feelings or stress. Lol. So maybe this is typical family stuff - these communications and concerns about a family member going through a bad divorce. Maybe it just seems extreme because of what they ended up doing. My family...www.websleuths.com
Rash further claims that Harvey's 70th was a surprise party and there's evidence to prove that - an invite. ' Are you aware of that?' ( rash means that obviously Donna would want to keep a surprise party a secret)
She is back in.I think judge will allow her back in because she's Dan's mom. JMO.
I’m sure they rationalized this as something they had to do because Wendi’s life had become so messed up she couldn’t manage anymore (“she‘s so stupid”) and so the boys had to lose their father. We are not dealing with people who think like we do, assuming they are guilty. JMOAnd this helps the defense why? Of course they felt bad for them. They had just lost their father. It’s not going to be a picnic.
Yes poor Wendi, her ex-husband wanted to still father his children they had together… just makes me sick.I’m sure they rationalized this as something they had to do because Wendi’s life had become so messed up she couldn’t manage anymore (“she‘s so stupid”) and so the boys had to lose their father. We are not dealing with people who think like we do, assuming they are guilty. JMO
Probably does have the text, maybe he will show them later during his evidence in chief.How is he going to get those text messages in? Do they exist? Wouldn’t he show them to this guy if they existed? Did he buy camera equipment?
Agree! $3000 is nothing to CA.Probably does have the text, maybe he will show them later during his evidence in chief.
TBH it means nothing to me even if he did spend £3K. It's chicken feed, he was earning £500K pa and during this period the whole Adelson clan had the fake threat narrative going on
- Harvey claims he slept in a chair all night when he got to Wendi's
- Donna & H claimed that they asked -while at synagogue?! - for police protection from TPD even tho they were only in Tally 48 hrs and refused to speak to cops
- Wendi claimed all kinds of ' Who's Next' Bullcrap to Jane on 18th
They all had this part of the ' Aftermath' story down pat. Cameras part of that imo
Didn’t think of that. Why is Rash making the state’s case right now with the phone calls between all these people? It’s Charlie to Katie, Katie to Sig, then Charlie to Donna. That’s consistent.Probably does have the text, maybe he will show them later during his evidence in chief.
TBH it means nothing to me even if he did spend £3K. It's chicken feed, he was earning £500K pa and during this period the whole Adelson clan had the fake threat narrative going on
- Harvey claims he slept in a chair all night when he got to Wendi's
- Donna & H claimed that they asked -while at synagogue?! - for police protection from TPD even tho they were only in Tally 48 hrs and refused to speak to cops
- Wendi claimed all kinds of ' Who's Next?' Bullcrap to Jane on 18th
They all had this part of the ' Aftermath' story down pat. Cameras part of that imo
Total charade!Agree! $3000 is nothing to CA.
He slept in a chair, lol. What a victim.
Didn’t think of that. Why is Rash making the state’s case right now with the phone calls between all these people? It’s Charlie to Katie, Katie to Sig, then Charlie to Donna. That’s consistent.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.