- Joined
- May 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,431
- Reaction score
- 35,710
Yes I'm sure everybody on WS would believe that but we have to remember when asked whether she'd conveyed that to anybody, Wendi testified in this trialI’ve always believed Wendi told Donna everything about her life, and Donna knew Dan was going out of town the next day. Especially since he was going to visit his new girlfriend. I think that’s something she would’ve told her mother. Donna wouldn’t even have needed to ask Wendi Dan’s schedule, she could have just passed that info on to Charlie. I believe she was that involved in Wendi’s life. From the tone of her emails, she sounds very strongly identified with Wendi. When she’s suggesting arguments Wendi should make in favor of the relocation, she uses the first person, “My parents’ finances have suffered.” It was Donna’s Motion for Relocation, in reality. Wendi may have been more willing to accept that it would be denied and she could try again later. The urgency for this crime was all Donna.
' Absolutely not!' ( link below)
( Basically my post was just about what the Defence can prove right now and I didn't want to have to trawl through Prawfs' blog myself, but Judy from AALegal Focus has already got there & done it. I trust Georgia will put the specific blog pages on screen and cover this over the next few days. Visuals matter for juries)
anyway ' Absolutely not!' is at 8:29:57
As an aside, Wendi's pre-emptive skills falter in the same segment - on the July 5th Harvey's 70th birthday. W's lack of memory contrasted with detailed recollections ( paella) culminating in Wendi's reply to the question on Harvey's birthday gift. Wendi forgets to react appropriately for a couple of secs.
( Well done Georgia, skilful)
Last edited: