FL - FSU Law Professor Dan Markel Murdered by Hitmen-Donna Adelson Upcoming Trial - *5 Guilty* #28

[Wishbone]

The idea that Georgia did not prepare her cross examination BEFORE the last day of trial is laughable. Prior to the beginning of trial Zelman had stated that Donna would be testifying. Everyone expected Donna to testify. But apparently Georgia was waiting until the last defense witness and the day Donna would take the stand to prepare her cross? Georgia’s statements at the presser refutes this obviously made up story by Joel Waldman, Surviving the Survivor. It was a lie. A total fabrication. One of many I might add.

Additionally, there is no way Georgia would’ve been privy to communications between Donna and her lawyers that evening. That’s privileged. And the lawyers advised the court Donna did not waver in her decision over night. If there was any hint that Donna had wavered, Georgia and Zelman would’ve brought it up at the sidebar Judge Everett referenced in his order. And it would be noted for the record that Donna wavered and Judge was following up to make extra sure on the record.

I’m pretty sure Joel said Donna changed her mind and that’s why Georgia was up all night. Pretty pretty sure! Also, I am arguing he never had a side conversation with Georgia after the verdict. It never happened. We all saw Georgia’s movements right after the verdict/presser. Many of these YouTubers have a lot of fans that spread their lies and that’s why there is so much misinformation out there on a lot of high profile cases these days. A lot of these YouTubers are doing a disservice to the pursuit of justice and truth. All they care about is clicks and likes. Beware.

JMO

Joel was on NewsNation and this is a video of what he said.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=800360225838278

 

[rescuemom]

So, it was not GC but her boss that said she didn't get much sleep. Donna said that she did not want to get on the stand 'at this time.'. The fact that her attorneys spent an extensive time talking to her after that, in the evening, meant that GC needed to be prepared. What I have learned from this trial is these lawyers put together big notebooks with their questions. I do believe GC did prepare, as it would have been wise to do. Wendi and Harvey will think they can outsmart GC, if they are arrested and go to trial. This is the foreshadowing that they will not be and she will take them down due to their hubris, in my opinion only.

' at this time' like she was still in charge.

 

[Weki]

Joel didn't lie, Georgia said at the press conference that she only slept for 3 hours. The rest is your interpretation. Because Donna could have changed her mind and gone to testify the next day and the judge would have let her.

This is just false. It’s not my “interpretation”. It’s what Joel said. And everyone who watched it knows it. We are not going to rewrite history. He also said Donna let out a “blood-curdling scream” when verdict was read. At another point he said she “wailed.” Again, we all saw her reaction to the verdict. That is a wildly inaccurate characterization of what happened, to put it generously.

JMO

 

[Fromeaster]

This is just false. It’s not my “interpretation”. It’s what Joel said. And everyone who watched it knows it. We are not going to rewrite history. He also said Donna let out a “blood-curdling scream” when verdict was read. At another point he said she “wailed.” Again, we all saw her reaction to the verdict. That is a wildly inaccurate characterization of what happened, to put it generously.

JMO

With all due respect, but these are just your interpretations, I don't see any lies. It's really strange how people understand and measure everything differently.

 

[Fromeaster]

So, after the first arrest in the case, Wendi called Sarah Yousef and said what if my crazy brother did it??? Wendi also mentioned to Sara that she was contacting law enforcement about the investigation, which is another lie from Wendi.

 

[LetsSolvIt]

So, after the first arrest in the case, Wendi called Sarah Yousef and said what if my crazy brother did it??? Wendi also mentioned to Sara that she was contacting law enforcement about the investigation, which is another lie from Wendi.

Remind us of source, please?

 

[Fromeaster]

Remind us of source, please?

Sarah's deposition transcript, several YouTubers read it, I listened to Deep Dive True Crime

 

[Zedzded]

So, after the first arrest in the case, Wendi called Sarah Yousef and said what if my crazy brother did it???

Her testimony is why I believe WA will be arrested. She phoned SY the day Garcia was arrested, freaking out and "shaking." Sy was puzzled as to why WA was not happy arrests had been made - funny that!

Note, in the news it was not released that the person who shot DanM was a hitman. Only that an arrest had been made. This means that a jury will almost inevitably accept that JL's parallel statement was also true.

So at the very least the State can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:
- in June 2014 WA believed CA was considering hiring a hitman to kill DanM.
- in April 2016 WA believed that CA had indeed hired a hitman to kill DanM.

Now to get a conviction it's about joining up the dots, although the jury can probably do that themselves. It's pretty easy for them to believe that WA's drive up Trescott was to confirm Dan had been shot if they also believe that WA knew CA had considered hiring a hitman.

I liken the power of SY's deposition to the testimony of Rob Adelson. She will get up on the stand and her testimony will eviscerate WA. She is too credible for the defence to challenge her statements. JL's statements are also reinforced by hers.

 

[Fromeaster]

Her testimony is why I believe WA will be arrested. She phoned SY the day Garcia was arrested, freaking out and "shaking." Sy was puzzled as to why WA was not happy arrests had been made - funny that!

Note, in the news it was not released that the person who shot DanM was a hitman. Only that an arrest had been made. This means that a jury will almost inevitably accept that JL's parallel statement was also true.

So at the very least the State can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:
- in June 2014 WA believed CA was considering hiring a hitman to kill DanM.
- in April 2016 WA believed that CA had indeed hired a hitman to kill DanM.

Now to get a conviction it's about joining up the dots, although the jury can probably do that themselves. It's pretty easy for them to believe that WA's drive up Trescott was to confirm Dan had been shot if they also believe that WA knew CA had considered hiring a hitman.

I liken the power of SY's deposition to the testimony of Rob Adelson. She will get up on the stand and her testimony will eviscerate WA. She is too credible for the defence to challenge her statements. JL's statements are also reinforced by hers.

I completely agree with you, she should rot in prison after this.

 

[Zedzded]

I don't think the SY deposition is something she can talk her way out of.

 

[DustysMom]

So, after the first arrest in the case, Wendi called Sarah Yousef and said what if my crazy brother did it??? Wendi also mentioned to Sara that she was contacting law enforcement about the investigation, which is another lie from Wendi.

DBM - got the answer