FL - FSU Law Professor Dan Markel Murdered by Hitmen-Donna Adelson Upcoming Trial - *5 Guilty* #28

[klondike]

she could have skipped getting bourbon or got it at a

I'd be surprised if LE don't have information that can show WA was lying about her Trescott trip i.e 2 trips, not 1.

 

[Knitpicker]

I'd be surprised if LE don't have information that can show WA was lying about her Trescott trip i.e 2 trips, not 1.

Ah so I convinced you of the 2 trip theory?
I do think this is going to sink her.
I went back over the Isom interview.
Why would she say “noon” if it was 12:30?
Georgia has asked her at each trial when she left the house.
Of course Corbit has said she was

I thought it was made clear it was Donna's evite, not Wendi's where the Adelson
name was used for Dan's two boys. Am I mistaken? I believe Donna had to do a sign in with a password to confirm.

Wendi said she helped her mother bc she didn’t know how to do it, didn’t she? Or did I dream that?

 

[BearWatcher]

Ah so I convinced you of the 2 trip theory?
I do think this is going to sink her.
I went back over the Isom interview.
Why would she say “noon” if it was 12:30?
Georgia has asked her at each trial when she left the house.
Of course Corbit has said she was

Wendi said she helped her mother bc she didn’t know how to do it, didn’t she? Or did I dream that?

She may have. I don't remember that, also did not listen to 100% of the trial. It is common for offspring to help parents with technology.

 

[Going Rogue]

The delay in Charlie’s trial was purportedly due to them needing to clean the Dolce Vita audio.

My theory and what makes sense to me is that they delayed in coming for the Adelsons because they thought Katie Magbanua had a few brain cells and would take the immunity deal. I’m sure once her jury hung that hope was renewed.

I still don’t understand why Charlie and Donna couldn’t have been tried together.

JMO

Yes, the enhanced audio was the excuse they used to justify the decision to finally arrest Charlie in 2022. I’ve previously mentioned Georgia Cappleman’s statements in a quasi press conference following Charlie’s arrest where she was asked about the enhanced Dolce Vita audio. I can’t quote her vanadium, but she made it very clear that she believed they had enough in 2016 and made it a point to say that the enhanced audio was good to have but if you listened carefully you could hear what they were saying in the original. It was evident to me that she disagreed with Meggs’ decision not to arrest Charlie in 2016, and she believed the evidence was sufficient for the state to meet its burden back then. In my opinion, even without the Dolce Vita recording, they could have won a case against Charlie. I’m not downplaying its significance, but that enhanced recording was a convenient excuse for the Tallahassee DA’s office. In my view, the decision in 2016 not to move forward with a formal indictment of Charlie was a major miscarriage of justice. I won’t fuel the conspiracy theories about why Charlie evaded justice from 2016 to 2022, as it has already been widely speculated and debated.

 

[Ferpo]

While the WA suspense continues, the next concrete event in this case is for DA to file a Notice of Appeal which she needs to do by November 12 if my calendar math is correct. A lot of of the You Tube channels are saying that the Appeal itself has to be filed in 30 days, which is incorrect. Will be interesting to see which Appellate attorney that DA/HA enlist for this.

 

[Going Rogue]

"Of course ‘new’ evidence, would be a different story"

Wondering what, if any, new evidence has been gleaned from DA's cell phone since she was arrested that would further implicate WA?

Next month marks the two-year anniversary of Donna’s arrest. Authorities have had her cell phone for nearly two years. Whatever they extracted from her phone must not be significant to the case against Wendi, or they would have acted by now. Another possibility is that they’ve encountered a hurdle – there could be exculpatory evidence on Donna’s device related to the case against Wendi. I can easily imagine Donna making numerous deliberate statements denying involvement in Dan’s murder and portraying Wendi as a victim. Even if untrue, Wendi’s defense team could use these statements if the case ever goes to trial.

 

[Going Rogue]

She may have. I don't remember that, also did not listen to 100% of the trial. It is common for offspring to help parents with technology.

Yes, I have always helped my parents with technology and my kids help me, but its different with Wendi. Anything and everything she did or does is somehow tied to the murder – at least that’s how many view & dissect her every action. That’s also he reason there are 1001 indicators of her guilt and list is growing

 

[Knitpicker]

She may have. I don't remember that, also did not listen to 100% of the trial. It is common for offspring to help parents with technology.

The point is who put the last name “Adelson” on the invite for the boys.
If Wendi did the invite she did. If she helped her mother with the invite, and Donna did it, then Wendi saw it.
Either way, Wendis responsible for changing her boys last name while their father was alive.

 

[Zedzded]

Ah so I convinced you of the 2 trip theory?
I do think this is going to sink her.
I went back over the Isom interview.
Why would she say “noon” if it was 12:30?
Georgia has asked her at each trial when she left the house.
Of course Corbit has said she was

Wendi said she helped her mother bc she didn’t know how to do it, didn’t she? Or did I dream that?

I've got an open mind to the 2 trips. But Trescott will sink her yes. Can you imagine the jury being told all about the farcical TV repair for a $300 TV that every single Adelson was involved in arranging it's repair. Then being told WA spoke to one of the convicted killers (CA) for 20 mins shortly before the murder. Then being told she drove up to the crime scene shortly after the shooting. Then being told she lied about her journey...

 

[IQuestion]

That proves she really never thought they would get caught.
But what would all the recipients of the invitation think?
They know the boys last names is not Adelson.
I wonder what Rob thought. What a stupid move for a Validictorian

A psyche professor in college explained a phenomena about making stupid mistakes as one gets closer to their ultimate and imagined goal. It was called "goal gradient effect." WA had a timeline...get rid of DM before charges of financial fraud were filed.
The first June attempt failed, as the hitmen lost the trail (per Luis R.. Another, possibly earlier, event failed when the "hired pseudo hitman" took the "A" money and ran. (Discussed but I can't provide a mainstream media source for it.) I think WA began making more and more mistakes as the clock ticked down. When something obsessively builds up inside her, she has to "let off steam" like a regulating governor on a piece of machinery. Whether it be writing a book about a doomed marriage as she is planning the same event in real life. Please note, she included her mother in the planning of that event by having her rent a place to live under her mother's maiden name! Unnecessary chicanery. Maximizing the hurt and distress to Dan by informing him right before his New York presentation. Do you think the planning of only that one life event would be the limit of DA's involvement in all WA's clandestine schemes?
IMO, WA began making a lot of mistakes...she just couldn't help herself: The alluding to CA looking for a hitman the summer before. Getting her parents overly involved, building the hate with every whine, woe-is-me, he is tarnishing my reputation at FSU,
he is psychologically abusing me, he won't let me move back home and then...the only way I'll ever be able to move is if he is dead.
Have we not heard the master matriarch in action...."we can take pills and never wake up or fly to Viet Nam." (Can't help but notice how "untimely death" is a recurrent thought and tool of manipulation.)