The video clearly shows a gun nut accosting a mother and child while they waited in the car.
Not in the video I saw. I saw a man talking to someone in the car, the man wasn't acting violent or aggressive. Like I said before thank goodness it's on video.
Luckily the video shows the truth and there is no evidence of D being angry, screaming, or threatening. The woman's police report states that she wasn't threatened or harassed. The only angry violent person was MM, and that is also clearly shown on the video.
So using the profanity f******g is just part of normal day to day speech?
What does that have to do with a man being attacked and having to defend himself? The video has no audio, so there is no proof of profanity, insults, or threats. Actually the woman said there were no threats. That said, there is no law allowing you to attack people for using profanity. Freedom of Speech.
Freedom of speech means that the government cannot restrict your speech against them. In other instances you suffer the consequences for saying whatever you like. Witnesses said that he used profanity. I would feel threatened if a total strange yelled at me with a profanity. I am not sure why you would not.
Has been said so many times but to no avail. I‘m beginning to think there are bots posting here.
It also seems to me that if you want to protect yourself, you need to use a gun to do it, pushing someone away from your family is not protecting them. Only shooting will do, except if you are ...........Has been said so many times but to no avail. I‘m beginning to think there are bots posting here.
They are supposedly passing it up the chain since they really don't want to book the guy for anything at all. So it may take a while.
No, you cannot physically assault and injure someone for cursing. If you do, YOU will suffer the consequences of either a day in court or from someone with a CCW. The woman said she wasn't threatened, it's in the police report. No law was broken until MM brutally slammed D to the concrete.
That would be a violation of the right to privacy. Why would the person defending themselves be "mentally ill" and the person brutally attacking them not?
Polygraphs are not evidence, and you can't be forced to take one. When would he have told MM he had a gun? MM came up and slammed him from behind. Kind of hard to communicate in those circumstances. Show me on the video exactly what time is there to tell MM he had a gun.
It is a bit difficult to do a mental health evaluation on a dead person.
Not every person who criminally attacks another person dies in the process. In fact, the victim is more likely to die than the attacker.
The thing is, speech is not against the law, assault is. I'm sure profanity is not a justification for assault.
Yappy ones at that.IMOHas been said so many times but to no avail. I‘m beginning to think there are bots posting here.
BOOM. This. Thanks Dexter.
It's a fantasy many people have. Did you ever see A Christmas Story? There are grown men who see themselves as Ralphie, using their Red Rider BB rifles to save everyone from the bad guys.
