- Joined
- Dec 7, 2019
- Messages
- 5,177
- Reaction score
- 19,443
And she's now listed as 12 at the time of her disappearanceHer DLC has been changed to Feb. 14, 1971 in her NamUs file, versus the same day in 1973 as originally reported.
And she's now listed as 12 at the time of her disappearanceHer DLC has been changed to Feb. 14, 1971 in her NamUs file, versus the same day in 1973 as originally reported.
The 'circumstances of her disappearence' has also changed on NamUs from 'a relative saw her being forced into a car after school', to 'She ran away from her home'. That's quite a substantial difference.And she's now listed as 12 at the time of her disappearance
Perhaps that relative is under suspicion thus their credibility is zero…..The 'circumstances of her disappearence' has also changed on NamUs from 'a relative saw her being forced into a car after school', to 'She ran away from her home'. That's quite a substantial difference.
Very odd. I wonder if they deemed the relative's witness statement of February 14, 1973 unreliable.
It's also strange how the year has been changed on the NamuUs 'date of last contact' (February 14, 1971), whereas the month+day has stayed the same.
The Charley Project and The Doe Network still say she was abducted shortly after leaving school on February 14, 1973!?
The height and weight range on her case is wild
Height: 4'5"-5'8"
Weight: 60-170 lbs
Yeah, i was referring to the doe network postAt least on my end, her height and weight are showing as 5'1"-5'3" and 100-105 lbs respectively in NamUs