I literally laughed out loud!! Oh man, that is the epitome of an attorney blantantly calling you dumber than a doorknob. Someone forgot to tell her she's not the center of the universe, like when she was 5 or so......
On the bright side, with all these delays, she probably has had plenty of time to study the law and will be able to go Pro Se at trial. Then we will have another DBrooks debacle.
No. You can never be forced to go pro se.
It would be her choice.
Almost all pro se cases are assigned “standby counsel”. This is an attorney who is available to assist if necessary. This was seen in the Bradley Yohn case recently. He often asked questions and Trevor Summors case last year. He basically tag teamed in and out with his stand by.
No. You can never be forced to go pro se.
It would be her choice.
Almost all pro se cases are assigned “standby counsel”. This is an attorney who is available to assist if necessary. This was seen in the Bradley Yohn case recently. He often asked questions and Trevor Summors case last year. He basically tag teamed in and out with his stand by.
Someone who has a contract to work as a public defender will be assigned by the court. They will get very strict on not letting them withdraw. Admonish her.
If they get to trial and she acts out, there are several remedies via Illinois v Allen
The judge may:
Bind and gag the defendant, thus keeping him present in the courtroom.
Cite the defendant for criminal or civil contempt.
Remove him from the courtroom until he pledges to reform his conduct.
If it’s prior to trial, there is probably similar precedent, but I am not familiar with it off the top of my head.
Someone who has a contract to work as a public defender will be assigned by the court. They will get very strict on not letting them withdraw. Admonish her.
If they get to trial and she acts out, there are several remedies via Illinois v Allen
The judge may:
Bind and gag the defendant, thus keeping him present in the courtroom.
Cite the defendant for criminal or civil contempt.
Remove him from the courtroom until he pledges to reform his conduct.
If it’s prior to trial, there is probably similar precedent, but I am not familiar with it off the top of my head.
The prior attorneys have almost all been public defenders, as I understand. All but the first one, and we’re now on 6 or so? So, what’s a judge to do if the pool has run dry? Wait ‘til the guy with the capital case finishes the capital case? Has SB waived her right to a speedy trial?
The latest in a string of attorneys who have withdrawn from Sarah Boone's case said that 'no attorney can satisfy' his client.
www.courttv.com
last updated 7:11 PM, August 24, 2023
Frank Bankowitz was formally named Boone’s attorney on July 11, 2022. Bankwoitz filed a motion to withdraw on Aug. 22, citing “irreconcilable differences.”
The prior attorneys have almost all been public defenders, as I understand. All but the first one, and we’re now on 6 or so? So, what’s a judge to do if the pool has run dry? Wait ‘til the guy with the capital case finishes the capital case? Has SB waived her right to a speedy trial?
All of her attorneys could be classified as Public Defenders because she is not paying for them. There are frequently cases where the court hires what some refer to as “special counsel” (titles vary). This is an attorney that generally has a private practice that works for the PD on special cases. This usually happens when there may be codefendants and it would be a conflict of interest for one office to represent them both.
We saw this in the Koberger trial where they had to call in an attorney qualified on death penalty cases.
This is a huge issue in the YSL trial in Fulton Co. There were around 2 dozen defendants on the same case to start. Many private attnys were acting in a PD capacity. Apparently not enough funding was secured for them. They are committed to the trial for 6 months and unable to take on her clients. They have argued that with their current pay, they are making less than $10/hr. I saw a comment somewhere they said “now they know what jury duty feels like” which is actually kind of accurate.
Is it possible for the case against her to keep moving forward as her lawyers continue to rotate or is there a certain stage where her legal team is required to be set before the case can continue?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.