infinity14
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Messages
- 173
- Reaction score
- 0
yes, but we never got an answer, neither did infinity last we heard.
No answer..........................

yes, but we never got an answer, neither did infinity last we heard.
How do you twist parents/grandparents showing baby pics of their nude babies to be? I honestly can't figure out how you get to such conclusions.
Sorry, but the laws onaren't black and white - child
is definitely an arrest but what one does with adult
, is always subject to interpretation by the law.
It's well known that showing adultto children can lead to sexual deviation - not sure what your implication is, but I don't think Somer had any sexual deviations, far more likely that her murderer did. mho
Tara, there is video of AC in the funeral video where it talks about the family arriving about an hour before everyone else.
I'll find it and post it here even if you already found video.
thanks for posting the video....I don't think it is him either....oh well....
I think he was there, but it was a coincidence, from the lunch meeting, I dont think the kids knew he was there and that dt came up with babysitting to cover no one usually at home.
I thought they said there was "typically an adult there to meet them" because if Somer was found, things would likely go back the way they were ... and they didn't want to announce to the public and the RSO-filled neighborhood that these kids were home alone from 3-5 ... more to protect the kids.
Ok if what you are all saying is true - that SP allegedly was NOT there to wait for the kids ... then why would DT go on TV and keep making remarks over and over that it was a safe neighborhood where all of the kids walked home, and she had no idea ANYTHING could ever happen, and by the way, she was not eligible for busing, etc., it just sounds like based on your premise she is digging herself in even deeper. Especially since so many people were outraged that this woman could be called to account, being a poor single mom with no child care arrangements. Public sentiment was clearly on her side.
And if he was not there to pick up kids, it looks pretty suspicious that she came home for lunch with him, he stayed there all day (for what reason) and was there when the kids got home. And then sent the two little ones out to look for Somer. It just casts a damning light on him all around. And finally, if they lied about that, what other things did they lie about?
No need for THAT link....I'm familiar....but that's all I got.
Anything else out there?
I think the poster was referring to something on the news recently where the children were taken from the parents for 30 days because they showed nude or partially nude pictures of their kids. IMO the pictures shown on TV were not child, but just pictures of small kids in the bathtub or getting out of the tub wrapped in a towel.
I think some may have misunderstood my post.
I DO think Sean was at the house that day. I was responding to the comment by Sheriff that typically there was an adult there when the kids came home. True or not, I think the statement was made because at this time, it was a missing child case, and LE didn't want to announce to this RSO-laden neighborhood that these kids were home alone from 3-5 each day.
I don't think there was any law being broken ... I thought it had been determined that FL had no specific law on age of babysitter/kids home alone.
I'll go back and quote the post that I'm referring to if I can get the multiple post option to work for me!
O/T
I personally dont think anything is cuter than my fat naked babies. And I think pin was just pointing out how these cute pics can get innocent people in trouble, while mostdoes not.
BBM: you are correct Noway; here's the link (scroll down to the portion that talks about leaving your child at home alone):
http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/publications/fsp/trainingbulletin/july08_trainingbulletin.pdf
thanks - I had no idea what was being referred to. I didn't see that news clip. IMO if parents were taking nude pics of their babies and showing them around for the sake of 'shock' or selling their child for sex, that is understandable. A month seems like a long time for just showing nude pics - must be a lot more to it.
BBM: you are correct Noway; here's the link (scroll down to the portion that talks about leaving your child at home alone):
http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/publications/fsp/trainingbulletin/july08_trainingbulletin.pdf
thanks - I had no idea what was being referred to. I didn't see that news clip. IMO if parents were taking nude pics of their babies and showing them around for the sake of 'shock' or selling their child for sex, that is understandable. A month seems like a long time for just showing nude pics - must be a lot more to it.
https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ruleno.asp?id=65C-13.033 (first link)(a) Babysitters shall be at least sixteen years of age or older and shall be screened by securing a Florida Department of Law Enforcement name check, a child abuse and neglect records check through the Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System , and a local criminal check.
At what age is it legal to leave a child home alone?
http://circuit8.org/family/FAQ.html (this is the Florida link above)
There is no minimum age established by law. Whether a child can be left alone depends on a number of factors, including: the child's maturity; the safety of the environment they are in; how long they are left alone; whether or not they can get in touch with their parent or caregiver; and whether or not they know what to do in case of an emergency. Leaving a child alone can constitute neglect on the part of a parent or caregiver if the child could be in any danger of harm.
The Thompson children were not home alone. Maybe what I should be looking at is the age of babysitters in Florida. I think there may be a difference if it is family member. Maybe?
https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ruleno.asp?id=65C-13.033 (first link)