Thanks for proving the point. Although I think in this case, to use "discarded" when discussing people is a very poor word choice.
Thanks for proving my point too..
I didnt do it... but my words get picked picked picked apart too.
Thanks for proving the point. Although I think in this case, to use "discarded" when discussing people is a very poor word choice.
I used to think DT was guilty as well -- I take that back 100 percent after re-reviewing different evidence over the past week. With careful re-examination the DT theory does not fit. Although many "quirks" about the garbage can be made etc.. But it is not enough to make this theory stick in my head.
The only thing DT is guilty of is less than stellar parenting -- maybe some drug activity (Rumor), IMO.
I believe this was an act done by teenagers -- lots of capable ones out there from what a few of us have seen.
As far as the Jumpsuit, Sweatsuit etc.. I use all those terms personally - I am 30 so I don't think how old you are matters -- I personally love my Juicy Jumpsuits -- they technically are not sweat suits nor are they jogging suits which are not typically made of velour -- So I always refer to these as jumpsuits --- if I am in something like workout Adiddas or Nike -- I usually call it a jogging suit or sweatsuit. Since those one piece outfits that Elvis wore have been making their way back onto the fashion scene - those too would be called a jumpsuit -- course the woman 5'9 less than 120lbs are the ones who pull those off in a fashionistic kinda way
If it's his DNA under her nails, it would solve this case. Providing they even have his DNA on file. Perhaps the reason this case isn't solved is because no match to the DNA under Somer's nails has been found.
I pray this case is solved very soon. I can't be this upset all the time. I like to speak to Somer and she always tells me it's Campbell who did it. I don't know who Campbell is but there are over 400 Campbells in Orange Park.
Even if the fees were gratis or pro bono. In this case you might have to know whether they send a bill that's been charged then zeroed out.
She might owe taxes on those gifts and services, too. I wonder if the CPA will do those filings gratis?
YES!!!
It makes perfect sense to me. I've been saying that since the beginning.
Why some of the early interviews are still being picked apart I will never know.
No one, IMO, can say what they would or would not say after finding out
their daughter has just been taken.
Then, the interviews from right after she was found in a pile of garbage are still being picked apart...IMO how can we take what DT says and over anylize it...over and over...this woman just found out her baby was killed and thrown away.
Like the jumpsuit thing...If God forbid my DD was taken and she was wearing an outfit similar to Somer's I would no doubt say she was wearing a jumpsuit.
It hurts my heart that that would be used against me because some people would not call it that.
Of course...this is all MOO
I don't see anything DT has said that points a finger to her. IMO
Does anyone else think that some things are picked, picked, picked apart until something, anything is found that matches what was being looked for in the beginning. I.e., DT's guilt.. that her speech is picked apart by some until, finally, they find the "nugget" they have been searching for to support what they say, even though the mountain they searched to get there didnt support it at all? LOL.. does this make sense to anyone.. anyone kwim?
New,
OT:
Yes they are back!! Something I would have worn pre-babies if they were in!!!! However, after still having 30lbs more to loose to be that baby weight - One Piece Jumpsuits are not in my near future
I just thought of something else too -- did anyone else ever use the term "Jumper" -- my grandma used to use that too for like certain styles of one piece outfits as well.
I totally understand everyone's frustrations here. I am not picking DT apart. If it were one or two things, I wouldn't even notice. There are many, many things that don't match up. Even so, I believe people are innocent until proven guilty. DNA is a modern, sure fire way to deal with it. But I think in terms of how a person would sleuth this case without modern technology, and you would have to tie a lot of things together.
Whoever did it, there are a lot of things that just do not make sense.
Finally, I wish everyone here would just allow everyone their opinions and not take offense. It doesn't help Somer for anyone here to be picking on anyone else, and I think we all just want to see it taken care of.
Maybe Diena was never a suspect to LE and they felt that to clear her was unnecessary?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.