FL - Somer Thompson, 7, Orange Park, 19 Oct 2009 #35

Status
Not open for further replies.
so does anyone have anything they have sleuthed that makes you go, "Huh?" or leads to some new questions?

BTW-the Homeland Security is looking at hiring some kind of firm to read people's faces to see if they are possibly terrorists or up to no good. So there must be something to all of this.
 
Did anyone ever find out who is the partner with Vinson in his business? I ask this since he was questioned for hours.
 
I still think there is a lot more to the whole Vinson / Kyle / Somer's house / Gano house thing.

I was hoping more info would come of the evidence they collected. Do we know for sure or not that the tests have come back?

I thought they were still waiting but the news piece before DT's interview this morning made it sound like the tests had come back and they didn't really find anything with them.
 
Ok my head is splitting. Gonna take a break.

See y'all later.
 
Today Show Video: Somer Thompson case turns cold7:51
Jan. 22: Three months after her death, police in Florida struggle to solve the murder of 7-year-old Somer Thompson. Diena Thompson, Somer's mother, and her attorney, Mike Freed, speak with TODAY's Meredith Vieira about the ongoing investigation.
[ame="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/35006253#35006253"]Today Show Video Player[/ame]

:angel:
 
I still think there is a lot more to the whole Vinson / Kyle / Somer's house / Gano house thing.

I was hoping more info would come of the evidence they collected. Do we know for sure or not that the tests have come back?

I thought they were still waiting but the news piece before DT's interview this morning made it sound like the tests had come back and they didn't really find anything with them.

It's discouraging to say the least. I think LE may have messed things up somehow. If they were honest in the beginning about the cause of death, sexual assault etc, it would have been better. There were lots of false leads as well that made things worse. This monster has gotten away with it so far.
 
I still think there is a lot more to the whole Vinson / Kyle / Somer's house / Gano house thing.

I was hoping more info would come of the evidence they collected. Do we know for sure or not that the tests have come back?

I thought they were still waiting but the news piece before DT's interview this morning made it sound like the tests had come back and they didn't really find anything with them.

Yes, that is way is sounded from the beginning news report to me as well. Seems there is no match to the Vinsons.

I am sure there will always be new DNA coming in continuously as they interview new people KWIM?
 
All the talk about Somer's pictures brought to mind an area I don't recall anyone looking at: who does the school photography there? Seems like the pictures would have been taken not long before she disappeared.
 
What do you all think about the lawsuit whee it states that Vinson worked at the DT home? Lawyer is sadly mistaken?

If he is, the suit will be thrown out faster than you can say VD and B.
 
What do you all think about the lawsuit whee it states that Vinson worked at the DT home? Lawyer is sadly mistaken?

If he is, the suit will be thrown out faster than you can say VD and B.

I can't imagine Gannett's lawyers having any trouble getting that case dismissed regardless. If their reporting contained any false statements, I don't know what they were. And truth is an absolute defense to a defamation suit.

Defamation, slander, libel in FL defined here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1007384/posts

What I really don't understand is what they hope to gain from the suit, why now, and why pick a personal injury attorney to handle it. Is is just a "lotto" mentality going after deep pockets and hoping something sticks? Is it a "good offense is the best defense" thing? Kinda puzzling to me.
 
Just got home from work. Catching up and have not read thru yet, but since this is directed to me...I will respond.

This has NOTHING to do with my love or lack of love for DT or anyone else for that matter.

You brought up the tear ducts in the outsite corner of eyes, then when I tried to talk about it, you talk about everybody defending DT instead of looking at the evidence. :waitasec: I saw evidence of tears! I really don't care what corner they came out of. They were there. It saddens me this woman has had to endure the pain and torment that she has. She lost her daughter.

Why does it appear she worked in the Jax office that day? Because someone commented on a message board that she did?
Is this evidence? IMO we don't know who put that there or why. Comments on a message board are rumor. No way to tell if it is fact. I will not treat it as fact.

Maybe DT called SP because she had not heard from AT yet. Because SP had sent her back out to look for Somer.


This is my response to your questions. They are my opinion.

You wanna look at evidence, well let's do that.
I'd much rather do that than sit here and go frame by frame on a video and look for any little thing DT is not doing right or "normal" for a grieving mother.

BBM

No, because that was the address used for her place of employment on the MPR. It's a FACT that the Jacksonville office is listed on the MPR.
 
so does anyone have anything they have sleuthed that makes you go, "Huh?" or leads to some new questions?

BTW-the Homeland Security is looking at hiring some kind of firm to read people's faces to see if they are possibly terrorists or up to no good. So there must be something to all of this.

Well,I'm interested in this.For the things to look for in Somers killer after the murder.It says this.I am interested in why they said work vehicle and not just someones vehicle.What made them think someones work vehicle?


1. No longer operating their work vehicle for any reason, including reporting it stolen, giving it away or hiding it in a garage.
 
Well,I'm interested in this.For the things to look for in Somers killer after the murder.It says this.I am interested in why they said work vehicle and not just someones vehicle.What made them think someones work vehicle?


1. No longer operating their work vehicle for any reason, including reporting it stolen, giving it away or hiding it in a garage.

You know that is strange. It was almost like the cops were telling the perp not to do that.
 
Well,I'm interested in this.For the things to look for in Somers killer after the murder.It says this.I am interested in why they said work vehicle and not just someones vehicle.What made them think someones work vehicle?


1. No longer operating their work vehicle for any reason, including reporting it stolen, giving it away or hiding it in a garage.



BBM

I thought they said this too, until I listened to it again. The Sheriff said "no longer operating their work or PERSONAL vehicle."
 
BBM

No, because that was the address used for her place of employment on the MPR. It's a FACT that the Jacksonville office is listed on the MPR.

It is a fact, that DT put this address on the police report, but they have two offices. The OP office is within walking distance from her home & the children's schools. We know by the MPR according to DT she went home to have lunch with SP. There has always been a question if she worked at the Jacksonville office, was the story of lunch possible time-wise? The co-worker in the paper stated she worked at the OP office on this particular day, which leads credence to her being home at lunch vs not adding up time-wise for a lunch break? Yes, you have to take everyone & what they say with a grain of salt...but to me, this rings true (knowing there are two offices).

ETA so the OP makes sense or DT's story on lunch is NOT hinky to the timeline. That is why it is so important to establish where she was that day, I also hope that justice is found along with everyone else here, of course!!!
 
You know that is strange. It was almost like the cops were telling the perp not to do that.

Maybe she was found in some kind of work related item or something or work related things were found with her.
 
[/B]

BBM

I thought they said this too, until I listened to it again. The Sheriff said "no longer operating their work or PERSONAL vehicle."

Oh well.I guess that doesn't narrow it down.Sigh.Ok,Thank you.May I ask where you heard this.I got what I had from the AMW site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
185
Guests online
522
Total visitors
707

Forum statistics

Threads
625,590
Messages
18,506,753
Members
240,820
Latest member
Berloni75
Back
Top