REspectfully snipped:
From what i understand, these kinds of perps rarely commit that kind of crime in their own home, too much trace evidence for L.E to find. They normally do this in an isolated place, out in the open somewhere! Then again, there are always exceptions to the rule.
If JH is guilty of this crime against Somer, my opinion is this was a crime of opportunity. I don't believe that he was stalking or grooming Somer, I think he saw the chance, and acted quickly without premeditation. I hate to keep repeating myself on this, but I did think that this may turn out a lot like the Holly Jones case. Look it up if you are interested and have some time. There was a direct link between the convicted man in that case and his viewing of child











.
Wonder what dumpsters were close by if she was killed in one of the houses? Guess the perp. would have had to have picked the opportunity very carefully to place her there if it was a populated neighbourhood. The risk of being seen.
I too feel this was a crime of opportunity. Do we know if Somer was taken to and from school on most days by a neighbour?, just that on the fateful day she couldn't take her. If a perp. was watching children on a daily basis waiting for a victim?, then why Somer? I am sure there were plenty of other children from what i understand that walk that route. I don't even know the frequency of how often Somer had to walk. How often did she stop and pat that dog? Wouldn't other children have been with her too when she did? Was she really a little child that was prone to walking off by herself frequently?
Could Somer have been directly placed at the landfill after the fact?, rather than elsewhere first, another theory.