Paintr
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 5,964
- Reaction score
- 42
http://www.bradenton.com/news/breaking_news/story/1564282.html
Bruce Fast said he is willing to tell jurors he believes his son Thomas Fast killed and dismembered his wife.
But that did not happen, as Assistant State Attorney Art Brown did not question Bruce Fast at all about the circumstance surrounding surrounding Susan Fast's disappearance. Bruce Fast only testified about items he found missing from his home and blood he found in his house when he returned from a business trip to the Bahamas on June 30, 2007. On Wednesday, Bruce Fast told the Bradenton Herald he had been prepared to tell jurors he believes Thomas Fast killed his wife, stuffed her body parts in garbage bags and dumped the bags in a storm drain at Lakewood Ranch Publix shopping center. Brown also made a passing reference to Thomas Fast's erratic behavior in the years prior to the killing.
Clever move by the prosecution. Now maybe the defense can't question Bruce with the intention of blaming him. Doesn't cross examination have to stick to those things brought up by the prosecution?
Bruce Fast said he is willing to tell jurors he believes his son Thomas Fast killed and dismembered his wife.
But that did not happen, as Assistant State Attorney Art Brown did not question Bruce Fast at all about the circumstance surrounding surrounding Susan Fast's disappearance. Bruce Fast only testified about items he found missing from his home and blood he found in his house when he returned from a business trip to the Bahamas on June 30, 2007. On Wednesday, Bruce Fast told the Bradenton Herald he had been prepared to tell jurors he believes Thomas Fast killed his wife, stuffed her body parts in garbage bags and dumped the bags in a storm drain at Lakewood Ranch Publix shopping center. Brown also made a passing reference to Thomas Fast's erratic behavior in the years prior to the killing.
Clever move by the prosecution. Now maybe the defense can't question Bruce with the intention of blaming him. Doesn't cross examination have to stick to those things brought up by the prosecution?