Flight to London Gatwick crashes at airport in India .June 12 th 2025

ICAO had asked for the investigator who was in India to be given observer status, but Indian authorities refused the offer, the sources said.

Previously, the International Civil Aviation Organization has deployed investigators to help with certain probes, such as the downing of a Malaysian plane in 2014 and a Ukrainian jetliner in 2020, but those times the agency had been asked for assistance.


 
ICAO had asked for the investigator who was in India to be given observer status, but Indian authorities refused the offer, the sources said.

Previously, the International Civil Aviation Organization has deployed investigators to help with certain probes, such as the downing of a Malaysian plane in 2014 and a Ukrainian jetliner in 2020, but those times the agency had been asked for assistance.


The problem is that Indian culture is one in which loss of face is seen as a complete taboo.

The signs are already there that this investigation may have been derailed for cultural reasons.
 

The decision to begin downloading recorder data around two weeks after the crash was unusually late, three experts told Reuters.

The recorders were found on June 13 and 16, but were only flown to Delhi for analysis on the 24th. The forward recorders (the ones with backup power supply) are being analyzed ATM.
So what’s happening, not sure we will get the truth here.
 
"Air India Crash:
Boeing officials & civil aviation secretary
summoned by Parliament committee.


The Parliament committee on Transport
has summoned the civil aviation secretary
and Boeing officials to appear before the committee regarding safety concerns.

The panel is likely to conduct a detailed study of the Ahmedabad plane crash
and is planning to hold deliberations over the same with various stakeholders, including the DGCA, Air India, Boeing, and others.

The committee
also deals with issues related to civil aviation.

The panel is planning to come up with a detailed report on the safety of passengers in aeroplanes,
and in this regard,
it is looking to hold wider discussions on the Ahmedabad plane crash."

 
The NTSB is present for the analysis, so if they can be trusted, we will know.
I would prefer if the NTSB actually did the analysis. It’s so important that this is looked at independently. Not sure that this will happen in India.

We have already seen some red flags. The black box was too burnt, the black box was not transported promptly.
 
Re the infamous party...

"Office Party Days After Plane Crash,

Air India Venture

Sacks 4 Senior Staff.

An AISATS spokesperson said

the company stands in solidarity with the families affected by the tragic loss of flight AI 171.


Four senior employees of Air India's airport gateway services provider AISATS
have been told to resign
after a video showing employees partying in the workplace
went viral on social media.

The party at AISATS' Gurugram office
was reportedly organised
just days after the Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crash.

'The behaviour does not align with our values,
and firm disciplinary action has been taken against those responsible
as we reaffirm our commitment to empathy, professionalism
, and accountability',

the spokesperson said.

The company said
it has asked four senior officials to go
and warned many others."

 
ICAO had asked for the investigator who was in India to be given observer status, but Indian authorities refused the offer, the sources said.

Previously, the International Civil Aviation Organization has deployed investigators to help with certain probes, such as the downing of a Malaysian plane in 2014 and a Ukrainian jetliner in 2020, but those times the agency had been asked for assistance.


I don't see any reason for ICAO to be that involved. India is already being assisted by NTSB. Adding more investigators isn't going to help the investigation.
 
I don't see any reason for ICAO to be that involved. India is already being assisted by NTSB. Adding more investigators isn't going to help the investigation.
From a technical standpoint, ICAO's presence is probably not needed in this case, but it adds to transparency. They were asking for an observer status.
 
<modsnip - quoted post was removed>
Also good books on the topic are "The Naked Pilot: The Human Factor in Aircraft Accidents" and the "Air Disaster" series.

What is interesting in this case is the absence of a clear theory. The different scenarios put forward seem to have low probability and often contain assumptions not yet supported by known facts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From a technical standpoint, ICAO's presence is probably not needed in this case, but it adds to transparency. They were asking for an observer status.
I don't blame the Indians for not allowing ICAO in. The NTSB is the gold standard and ICAO offers nothing more. And I sort of reject the "transparency" argument as well. ICAO is a UN entity and that brings along a lot of potential baggage. There is no obligation to allow UN entities into these investigations.
 
Also good books on the topic are "The Naked Pilot: The Human Factor in Aircraft Accidents" and the "Air Disaster" series.

What is interesting in this case is the absence of a clear theory. The different scenarios put forward seem to have low probability and often contain assumptions not yet supported by known facts.
I used to watch the "Air Disaster" episodes a lot. That was a great series.
 
I would prefer if the NTSB actually did the analysis. It’s so important that this is looked at independently. Not sure that this will happen in India.

We have already seen some red flags. The black box was too burnt, the black box was not transported promptly.
There are two black boxes that both record the same parameters. The delay did not change the ability of reading the data. The NTSB can't take over but they are a party to the investigation and their oversight should be enough to know if the proper procedures are followed.
I remember that in an old case from France it was alleged that the black box had been swapped during investigation. I don't think that happened here.
 
I don't blame the Indians for not allowing ICAO in. The NTSB is the gold standard and ICAO offers nothing more. And I sort of reject the "transparency" argument as well. ICAO is a UN entity and that brings along a lot of potential baggage. There is no obligation to allow UN entities into these investigations.
Weren't the ICAO conventions followed in the first place, when it comes to the composition of the investigation team? I know that formally they don't have to be present if they aren't invited, but I don't see how their involvement could be bad.
 

The above article mentions a possibility (at the end, without further explanation) that an incorrect input of flight parameters before takeoff could have caused a dual engine failure. I haven't seen that claim before.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
75
Guests online
473
Total visitors
548

Forum statistics

Threads
626,455
Messages
18,526,540
Members
241,053
Latest member
ATwistedSolo
Back
Top