Rlaub44
Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2007
- Messages
- 585
- Reaction score
- 19
Sure:
2. Reports and information required. This delegation of authority
requires that the Board rely on the judgment and decisions of
those who operate under its authority. However, this reliance of
the Board must be based upon its continuing awareness of the
operations of the University. Therefore, the Board shall receive
and consider thorough and forthright reports on the affairs of the
University by the President or those designated by the President.
It has a continuing obligation to require information or answers on
any University matter with which it is concerned.
(Emphasis added.)
The President (in this case, Spanier), either reports directly or designates who can report. The president doesn't want something reported, he simply prohibits that person from reporting.
The Board could suspend that rule, or amend it, or could instruct the President to require the person to report (under penalty of firing), but the person wanting to report cannot without the President's permission. I'll lay odds that the Trustees never realized that.
In the specific case, the rule granted Spanier the authority to determine who would and who wouldn't report. He, acting under this rule, told Baldwin to leave. Baldwin, under the rule, didn't have the authority to tell the Board.
Ironically, the rule is still in place. Erickson could get information from some employee and decide not to permit the person to report it. Erickson, hopefully, would not be that inept, politically.
I'll add that I checked the minutes of May 13, 2011 meeting, and the wording of the rule has not changed.
Thanks, but I still read it differently. To me, it means that the President is responsible and expected to keep the Board informed about any important matters, but not that it is restricting the board's access to other employees.
As in, the board needs to know what is going on in the day to day governance of the University, and the President had better not keep them in the dark about matters that may be critical. And if he doesn't do it himself, he had better delegate someone else to make the report.
(Still no response from the Office of General Counsel -I will post if I hear anything)