Friday 's hearing, what do you predict?

[BeanE]

I know! That is a very strange turn of events, their lawyer is subpoenaed as well, weird. Is it for the defense do you think?

I'm assuming it's for the defense. I posted a question for Richard Hornsby about it in his Q&A thread. Maybe he can shed some light. I'm stumped!

BeanE

 

[songline]

Wth is Brad going to testify about??

hmmm that will be interesting :waitasec:

 

[The World According]

If the Motion to Strike in regards to DCasey's deposition by the State is going to be argued on Dec 11th, could BConway, George, and Cindy have all been subpoenaed for that purpose?

Yes. Good catch!!!

 

[autumnlover]

We recently relocated to CA and I'm wondering if it will be televised at 6:30 AM here. I'm dying to see this hearing. I wonder if HLN will carry it. If CA, GA and BC are testifying this couldn't be good for the defense. I predict DC will be forced to testify and the prosecution will prevail on most everything (expect Judge Strickland to compromise on something, no matter how little).

 

[Melanie]

I predict a weary judge and a lot of wasted time. I am hoping most of the motions get struck down...but I guess we will see.

Oh I hope not -- I don't want to leave anything open for an appeal. Although if she gets the DP, there will be an automatic appeal.

I'm hoping the judge will be very careful...then strike them down Do we know if it will be televised. If so, I will not be cooking, cleaning, or looking for a job that day! Dang, when is this trial gonna start!

Melanie

 

[BeanE]

Yes. Good catch!!!

But what would Brad be testifying about?

You know, this is jogging my memory about a statement BC made in a TV interview. Something about DC working for GA/CA and, by extension, for him. It had us :waitasec:

I'll see if I can find the interview.

 

[Leila]

I just saw that the parents and Brad Conway have been subpoenaed to testify on Friday, but it wasn't clear if they are being subpoenaed by the defense or prosecution. I'm guessing the defense is calling them to plead destroying current videos and ask for visitation without cameras.

http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/news/anthony_case/120409-george-cindy-anthony-to-testify

I just saw that George and Cindy have been subpoenaed to testify, and would guess in regard to the destruction of videos of family jailhouse visits.

I don't see how Judge S could rule to destroy those videos. It would be setting up a precedent for others who might want videos destroyed that don't show them in a favorable light.

 

[logicalgirl]

I just saw that George and Cindy have been subpoenaed to testify, and would guess in regard to the destruction of videos of family jailhouse visits.

I don't see how Judge S could rule to destroy those videos. It would be setting up a precedent for others who might want videos destroyed that don't show them in a favorable light.

Now I am really confused! If they are testifying for the defense would they have to be subpoenaed? I'm hoping the prosecution wants a word with them.

 

[QB.]

Now I am really confused! If they are testifying for the defense would they have to be subpoenaed? I'm hoping the prosecution wants a word with them.

I think you are right, I think it must be for the state because of the subpoena. I really hope so. Something is going on.

 

[wicky]

I predict there is a slight chance the judge will rule in favor of the videotaping attorney visits. The rest... HAH!

 

[Searchfortruth]

Were they subpoened (Cindy and George) when they testified against having the autopsy report released to the media ? That was considered testimony for the defense side, so if not, then maybe this is for the state ?

Plus, they have never been subpoened by the defense in this case, or not that we know of, right ? I can't think of any reason for a subpoena unless it was coming from the state.

 

[QB.]

I have asked RHornsby on the Q&A thread, he is there now. Hoping he will answer.

 

[Amil]

I'm planning on attending the hearing. Even the boring ones are still interesting!

I'll be there too!!

 

[RR0004]

If the Motion to Strike in regards to DCasey's deposition by the State is going to be argued on Dec 11th, could BConway, George, and Cindy have all been subpoenaed for that purpose?

Yup...I think it'll be like watching the bouncing ball...he worked for CA/GA...no he worked for Baez...no he worked for Casey. I sure hope DC doesn't respond the same way he did to Morgan's questions 'cause it's just not going to work in Strickland's courtroom IMO.

 

[mitzi]

Who will keep count of the following words/phrases on Friday?
1. Mis truths
2. From day one
3. Misconstrued

:dance:

Also:
4. Ummmmm.

 

[RR0004]

I have asked RHornsby on the Q&A thread, he is there now. Hoping he will answer.

I would think that Brad would be aware of any contract signed by the As.

 

[The World According]

"Premature and Improper": STATE'S RESPONSE: Response To Defense Motion
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21869179/detail.html

 

[OneLostGrl]

Also:
4. Ummmmm.

absolutely

 

[Just Jayla]

Were they subpoened (Cindy and George) when they testified against having the autopsy report released to the media ? That was considered testimony for the defense side, so if not, then maybe this is for the state ?

Plus, they have never been subpoened by the defense in this case, or not that we know of, right ? I can't think of any reason for a subpoena unless it was coming from the state.

Aren't they on the state's witness list, though-so defense would have to subpoena them? Dunno

 

[The World According]

RHornsy opined that perhaps the reporter misspoke, again, and that they may not have been subpoenaed, so it could be the defense calling them, either way the state will have their turn to cross examine them. Popcorn time.