GA - Jennifer Wilbanks, runaway bride, for false police report, Duluth, 2005

  • #301
Bhodirasta said:
I agree, when a couple is ACCUSED OF RAPE that did NOT occur, it should be intersesting.
When a female INSINUATES that her HUSBAND COMMITTED THE CRIME, then it should be interesting.
when people can LEARN by her "mistakes" (we will FORGET the shoplifting convictions" then people should be interested. AND THEY WILL.
this is a fact of life...
no better shall you challenge the "fact of life" than will you challenge, "what needs' to be noticed".
Such is my OPINION on "The war on drugs."


Thats why they have Forums on Websleuths]

And thats why Websleuths has a Forum titled "Crimes in the News"
 
  • #302
tybee204 said:
And thats why Websleuths has a Forum titled "Crimes in the News"

Understood.
but the reason you and the "bandwagon" jumped on board is no differnet that the "bandwagon" WE jumped on board for. THe only problem, for you guys, is that is WASN'T the husband...
... I could get banned...
 
  • #303
What husband? and what bandwagon? Lord I need a map.
 
  • #304
tybee204 said:
What husband? and what bandwagon? Lord I need a map.

C'mon.
ETA...
WE SHOULD BRING UP PRIOR THREADS to see how many accused the "fiance" or "husband"
Maybe I go too "quickly:" LMAO
 
  • #305
Bhodirasta said:
C'mon.
ETA...
WE SHOULD BRING UP PRIOR THREADS to see how many accused the "fiance" or "husband"
Maybe I go too "quickly:" LMAO

Quickly? Maybe thats it lol because I dont have a clue what you are talking about.
 
  • #306
tybee204 said:
Quickly? Maybe thats it lol because I dont have a clue what you are talking about.

rEALLY??
YOU DON't THINK the "fiance" was accused here?
 
  • #307
Bhodirasta said:
rEALLY??
YOU DON't THINK the "fiance" was accused here?
i WOULD LIKE TO SEE MY STATEMENT that accused the "fiance"
 
  • #308
Bhodirasta said:
rEALLY??
YOU DON't THINK the "fiance" was accused here?

Jennifer Wilbanks fiance? Hell ya he was raked threw the coals in the media and all over the internet. As was Jessica Lunsfords father and about any other person closely connected to a missing person.

It sucks.
 
  • #309
tybee204 said:
Jennifer Wilbanks fiance? Hell ya he was raked threw the coals in the media and all over the internet. As was Jessica Lunsfords father and about any other person closely connected to a missing person.

It sucks.

fUNNY,
how you are taking up for the ones that actually ACCUSED GOOD OL
jW OF BEING :ASSAULETED" as opposed to those who "don't buy it"
FIANCE focus focus focus
 
  • #310
Bhodi you are making no sense. A few posts above you responded to your own post demanding you answer yourself. I have no clue what you are even going on about.
 
  • #311
tybee204 said:
Bhodi you are making no sense. A few posts above you responded to your own post demanding you answer yourself. I have no clue what you are even going on about.
yes, this is my specialty.
 
  • #312
packerdog said:
Anyone that shoplifts numerous times and paid fines knows full well that she is breaking the law. She had a record when she pulled this stunt, you would think she would have kept her nose clean. She apparently hasn't learned a thing from being arrested before. Maybe she can see a shrink in jail.
I agree, one would think that with prior arrests she would have learned her lesson and would want to keep her nose clean. However, I also think that the last place she would see a shrink on a regular basis, enough so that psychological progress is made, is in jail.

Jails and prisons aren't exactly noted for trying to rehabilitate a prisoner nor deal with their mental illness. I don't know about the jails and prisons in her area specifically, so I could be wrong. But in most cases as in most prisons, help for the mentally ill is slim to none and so are means of rehabilitation.
 
  • #313
Czarthethird said:
I agree, one would think that with prior arrests she would have learned her lesson and would want to keep her nose clean. However, I also think that the last place she would see a shrink on a regular basis, enough so that psychological progress is made, is in jail.

Jails and prisons aren't exactly noted for trying to rehabilitate a prisoner nor deal with their mental illness. I don't know about the jails and prisons in her area specifically, so I could be wrong. But in most cases as in most prisons, help for the mentally ill is slim to none and so are means of rehabilitation.
As in the case for PEDOPHILES or THEIVES. i agree. as LONG as wee shall "keep" the RIGHTS of the more "HABITUATED" easier, then we should let MJ out while we are"AT IT" lol GIMME YOU FIGHTS..
 
  • #314
Still confused...What does Michael Jackson have to do with the topic of this thread?

Lets stay on topic please.
 
  • #315
tybee204 said:
Still confused...What does Michael Jackson have to do with the topic of this thread?

Lets stay on topic please.
6 degrees of MJ??
:snooty:
 
  • #316
sharon25 said:
6 degrees of MJ??
:snooty
IT IS THE SaNE. or WAIT in sane..
 
  • #317
Bhodirasta said:
fUNNY,
how you are taking up for the ones that actually ACCUSED GOOD OL
jW OF BEING :ASSAULETED" as opposed to those who "don't buy it"
FIANCE focus focus focus

Bhodirasta,
Unless you can start making sense I ask you to please stop posting. This is just weird. I have no idea what you are talking about.
 
  • #318
sharon25 said:
I'm sure they will stand by her.
Even if privately they are thinking
other things.
If she's mentally ill she will also need their support
right now.
I almost wish this case would just go away.
Nothing really to discuss, IMO.
What she did was stupid and selfish.
I'm sure that she regrets it now that her face
is known all throughout america!

(didn't i say i wasn't going to post on this *LOL*)
i WAS ASSUMING that he HUSBAND would get the same treatment as thegiLPers would give. silllyyy mmeeee!!!
 
  • #319
Jennifer Wilbanks, 32, faces one felony count of making a false statement and one misdemeanor count of making a false police report. She could face up to six years in prison if convicted of both charges, as well as $11,000 in fines. She could also be ordered to reimburse authorities for the cost of the search that was prompted by her disappearance.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5031320,00.html

I know all the other threads have been shut down but hoped this one would be okay as she HAS been charged.
 
  • #320
Bhodirasta said:
I agree. there is INTEREST.


Can we please leave this forum to THIS CASE???? If anyone has questions about any other forum, and the reasons they exist, please take it someplace else. Thanks.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
118
Guests online
2,805
Total visitors
2,923

Forum statistics

Threads
632,114
Messages
18,622,235
Members
243,023
Latest member
roxxbott579
Back
Top