I agree, I still think it was murder, no accident! Especially since his organs have been removed, and there was evidence of blunt force trauma. Everyone just wants to think it was a tragic accident rather than believe some kids are capable of murder.
I have a few questions about this line of thought; I know a lot of people are thinking in this way. Perhaps you can help me get a clearer image about why people think this. I cant quite understand the rationale that the disposal of organs after autopsy and there being blunt force trauma to a body that has fallen from height onto that area of the body must mean murder.
1) What about the disposal of his internal organs leads you to believe there was a murder and a cover up?
Kendrick's body underwent an autopsy. All of his organs would have been removed and checked as part of that procedure. Then would then be returned to his body in a fashion (i.e. not in their natural positions and wrapped in plastic or bagged up to help preserve them until burial). The empty cavities are then filled with packing.
I don't believe that the disposal of organs after autopsy is standard, but it is certainly not unheard of if the condition of those organs is poor. Remember Kendrick was deceased and upside down for about 18 hours and not cooled to reduce the rate of decomposition.
2) What type of injuries do you think he sustained that were sufficient to kill him, would be undetectable from the outside of his body but also apparent from examination from one or more of his organs?
We know from the pictures of the scene that there was not enough blood to indicate a stabbing. That would be apparent from his body anyway.
There has been no mention of signs of strangulation such as marks or cuts on his neck. Considering the way his body lay for so many hours Im sure this would be difficult to determine just by looking. As the initial cause of death given was positional asphyxia, I believe that there would be little outward sign of cause of death. I dont think disposing of his organs would do anything to hide suffocation of another form. That would be evident from inspecting his neck, bones, muscles etc.
We know that there is evidence of blunt force trauma to Kendricks neck, was there signs of any on other parts of the body?
If there were a severe head injury wed expect to see signs of that on his head, face, scalp and his skull. From the images think its safe to say we cant tell if hed had a head injury. There would most likely be some signs though, if his body was examined again, such as a fractured skull etc.
There is a photo of Kendrick from the shoulders down to his feet. His top had moved upwards revealing his stomach. There were no signs at all of any bruising, cuts or marks of any kind I could see. So if there were any serious injuries to the internal organs of his torso they werent evident to those observing the outside of his body (in the photo at least!). Now, Im ginger haired with the palest skin there is, so I bruise worse than a peach. I wouldnt know how early bruising would show up on Kendricks skin tone and where his body would be pooling blood away from this area.
If a second autopsy was requested, it wouldnt be just the internal organs which indicated injuries consistent with a non-accidental event. Would I be correct in assuming that those who believe Kendrick met with foul play, that the destruction of the organs would hide the real cause of death or that it couldnt be conclusively determined without them?
3) If the only blunt force trauma was found on Kendricks neck, wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that this blunt force trauma could be the result of a person falling head first onto the floor from a height of approximately 6ft onto the side of their face, without being able to soften the fall with their hands due to space restrictions inside the mat?
Of course if there is trauma to other parts of his body then that could be very interesting.
I am genuinely trying to understand why so many people believe that blunt force trauma and the disposal of organs equates to murder/foul play, because Kendrick fell from a height onto his face, quite possibly without anything reducing that impact, and that disposal of organs isnt unheard of after autopsy.
I do hope that this case is investigated. We know that there is a very narrow window for foul play to have occurred. There was surveillance of the gym and so the number of people who could possibly be involved is very small and specific. I hope that Kendricks clothing was kept so they could be tested for DNA/hairs etc from those other people who entered the gym after him.