GeorgiaSunshine
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 120
- Reaction score
- 394
Has anyone noticed that while rotating his head fully left and right and raising upper extremity overhead close to camera for several minutes in bright sunlight that there is not a single visible laceration, abrasion, bruise, swelling or redness visible on SM - on the very parts of a perpetrator's body most likely to be injured when facing their victim while committing murder and cutting the body up? A sharp weapon such as a knife was probably used at some point and repeatedly to dismember multiple large joints of a muscular woman. Blood makes knives slippery and dangerous for the attacker. A sword in one fell swipe? Perhaps but these questions are examples of what a prosecutor must overcome to convince a jury to convict such an unlikely defendant. How likely a gun was used? The Spencers were home and have given statements to reporters. Why would they not mention hearing a sound that could have been a gun shot? SM would not likely have
the physical strength to strangle a 6 feet tall 27 year old athlete even with a device. The camera/reporter crew noticed....zero evidence of his skin being near a knife.
SeaStorm can you please give reference to an article or video you are talking about? I have no idea what you are speaking of, and I agree with the other comments on here that this is a very classy website that talks about opinion if it is not fact, and everyone is quite professional on here. Just travel to a Macon.com article and read the comments there to see the difference, no comparison to Websleuths.