Bobbisangel
New Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2004
- Messages
- 11,071
- Reaction score
- 230
maddie said:The jurors were not told the sentence before deliberations, and were, in fact, told that we were not to concern ourselves with the sentence. After the verdict, the judge told us that the sentence was a mandatory life sentence. I don't know the criteria for "life" vs. "life without parole," but this case was based on circumstantial evidence, and that might have had something to do with the sentence. It's apparently the first conviction in Georgia in which there was no body and no crime scene. Legally, it's a huge problem not to have a crime scene or body, not only for lack of evidence, but for jurisdiction of prosecution. I would not be surprised to see that used as grounds for appeal.
The charges we were to decide were "malice" murder, felony murder, and kidnapping (the latter only if we found him not guilty of the two aforementioned charges). We found him guilty of the first two.
Thanks for that info. I'll never understand or figure out the judicial system.
Scott Peterson's trial was all circumstancial and he got 1st degree murder x 2 and then the death penalty. Circumstancial evidence can be pretty powerful.
Can you explain "malice" and "felony" murder please? It seems like they could have went for 1st degree murder (premeditated) and kidnapping.
Hopfully it will take years before he can find an attorney to file an appeal. Those things seem to take forever. By the time that might take place he will be up for parole. He won't get parole on his first try. Hopefully never.