- Joined
- Sep 9, 2013
- Messages
- 472
- Reaction score
- 3,896
Animals in hot cars would bring up the same results, though. The first link...I don't even have to click it...says "Animals can sustain brain damage or even die from heatstroke in just 15 minutes". If he used animal instead of child to be less suspicious, you would think he would also omit the "to die" part.
Why would he search for animals dying in a hot car if he wanted to know how long it would take a child to die? All the results will be about animals, not children. Why would he search for something so incriminating on his work computer? I find it very unlikely the child was not dead at lunch. He could either discover him then or after work. Looking up hot car accidents was just unnecessary.
Because the process is nearly the same. In both cases, it takes as little as 15 minutes for life threatening brain and kidney damage to occur in both children and animals. I do a lot of animal advocacy work and many of the memes we circulate include "children and animals" as part of the general message.
Now, if he performed this search at 9:15am... that's the smoking gun. I don't think he did it at lunch time. By that time, it was too late...