My theory regarding the phone problems:
Since last year prosecutors tried to get access of OP's iPhone. The only one who can help them is APPLE - whom they contacted for this reason months ago.
But because APPLE isn't a SA located company, prosecutors need
a judicial decision from the SA court for the US court to instruct APPLE to crack the code to OP's iPhone.
This implies that a SA judge must confirm the US court that any information of OP's iPhone is admitted as evidence in court.
Such confirmation can only be provided by
the judge who is responsible for this criminal trial.
So, if previous reports are true that police has sent copies of supporting documents they had received from
magistrate Desmond Nair to the FBI, I suspect that the US court resp. the FBI hasn't accepted these documents - because Nair has nothing to do with evidence that will be used in the forthcoming (murder case) trial. He was only responsible for the
bail hearing but isn't responsible for the forthcoming (murder case) trial.
As we know
the judge for this trial has been appointed only four weeks ago.
For this reason I suspect that police/prosecutors need the judicial decision of
judge Masipa (and no one else) which they could send to the US court only after Masipa was officially appointed and gave them these judicial decision.
And this may be the
real reason why police/prosecutors still have to wait for the assistance of APPLE.
This what I was thinking about this too. So do you predict that the Judge would have already made the application so they will have it ready for the trial? Or would she have to wait until the trial and then order it to be done? Surely they would have to have it first. But they will surely get it - just a matter of when. They say they are ready so they must have got it by now.
So who will the Prosecutor be who will present the case of the State?
Gerrie Nel?