General theory thread and motives rehashed #3

[djdj247]

It would be very interesting to know exactly what Junior has told LE about that night. I believe he has provided LE with more info than just "man/men in black", "squeaky shoes" and "bouncing couch." I think he has provided some very important details that LE is keeping locked up tight... and, because of his age, LE needs to be extremely careful. IMO, Junior's info (that we have not heard yet) is very, very important to solving this case.

 

[Crosby87]

First of all, an assumption is being made that he had the children with him on the 5th and the 6th. If he worked ten hour shifts, he was most likely not working on friday. I am not sure but I think it was in the early evening that rc made a trip to San Mateo and threw misty's clothes on Nay's mother's lawn. If he worked eight hour shifts, then he could have dropped the clothes on the lawn on his way to work. We have not been told EVER what his shift was. He has evaded giving the time himself when he relayed the story to Cobra about the LE wanting to know what took him so long getting home from work that night.

To my kge, we don't know when ron left the children in the car. Heck, we don't even know his hours but I suspect they were around 3:30 or 4:30 to midnight or 1:00am.

I don't think we can assume just because he left his children in the car a few times at work that he wouldn't leave them alone in the house for a few hours. That is making a leap. He may have left them till he can round somebody up to babysit.

Ron lied or so it appears because he left everyone with the impression that everything was wonderful at the MH before he went to work. He said he kissed misty and the kids, told them he loved them and he'd see them all when he got home from work....a real Walton Pictorial.

I don't think everything was lovey-dovey when he left for work, do you? There was trouble brewing and this trouble just adds more controversy to what happened to Haleigh.

Here is my :twocents:

According to Kim Picazio, the security guard at PDM Bridge knows Ron had his kids with him at work on two occasions and he saw Ron come out to the car several times during his shift. Because we know Ron was on the evening shift and the only time we are aware of when Misty left Ron was on Feb 4th 2009, IMO it is reasonable to surmise the two evenings Ron took his kids to work with him was during Misty's absence based on the facts we have available to us.

When Ron was left without a babysitter, there is no evidence suggesting he locked them in the trailer and called someone to go and babysit. Based on the information Kim provided, what Ron did when Misty was gone was take his kids work with him so he could take care of them himself.

Misty keeps intimate details about her personal life private, and AS said that even if you "threaten her or do anything to her emotionally or mentally, that will not affect her”. I assume this means when Ron attempted to invade her personal space to obtain information from her regarding her weekend with Nay Nay, she refused to talk and provide him with the information he wanted so Ron turned the tables on her and retaliated by creating a scenario where she doesn’t know what happened to HaLeigh and she can’t talk because Ron is withholding information from her. Because Misty doesn’t know what happened because Ron placed her in a situation where she can’t talk, she is royally screwed for life. Kim Picazio said “This is a guy who even withheld from Misty on the day after his child is missing, he is on his knees crying with HaLeigh’s photo to the cameras, yet he turns around and smirks at Misty and is asking her if she has something to tell him with regard to her fantastic weekend. He was actually more concerned about putting the screws to his girlfriend that she had been sleeping around that weekend with a Gregory Page, than his missing child! That was what he was worried about.”

When LE interviewed Ron after his daughter disappeared, he refused to talk and he hired a Criminal Defense Attorney so he is IMO responsible for HaLeigh’s disappearance. Ron refused to go after Jo when he was given several opportunities to do so, or Tommy who lived around the corner. Ron’s intent was to get back at Misty for withholding information from him which he felt entitled to.

Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Show Transcripts and Show Videos - NO DISCUSSION!

http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/...gs_vanished_ronald_and_misty_lost_their_way_l

 

[kant]

Originally Posted by 1Chump
I wonder if she was injured fatally at one place and died at another. Because Ron never moved back into the MH. Gma Sykes said that Ron and most of the family broke down before they got to the steps to go inside.

The only reason I could see for Ron to not want to go into that house was to avoid memories of what happened there. Because if she was hurt/died at another location, Ron's MH should not have had family members breaking down at the thought of going in.

Ron went back to the MH..He even did televised interviews as did his mother and his grandmother...
I suspect IF he didn't want to go back and live in the MH it was because he was behind in his rent or he thought the MH may have been bugged...JMHO

bbm

Yes, this. I recall the interviews from the MH too. Wow, so not only did they manage to enter, but they maintained enough composure to carry out a televised interview replete with detailed MH tour.

Imo, "breaking down at the door (steps) " etc sounds like an acceptable excuse for not wanting to go back to live in the MH; so that may have been why it was selected by Teresa, Ron, et al as the appropriately chosen reason that they planned to feed to the unwashed masses.

The back-rent or the bug notion or both may have been the real reasons. IDK.

Another thing about the rent not having been paid or not paid in full... is the AC man. (Does anyone have that rent payment link handy?) I mean, the tenant doesnt normally arrange for those types of maintenance tasks, do they? And isnt a legal adult resident required to be present? And when rent is not paid up to date, are extra expenses like AC work generally offered by the landlord? Just wondering.

moo

 

[kant]

Here is my :twocents:

According to Kim Picazio, the security guard at PDM Bridge knows Ron had his kids with him at work on two occasions and he saw Ron come out to the car several times during his shift. Because we know Ron was on the evening shift and the only time we are aware of when Misty left Ron was on Feb 4th 2009, IMO it is reasonable to surmise the two evenings Ron took his kids to work with him was during Misty's absence based on the facts we have available to us.

When Ron was left without a babysitter, there is no evidence suggesting he locked them in the trailer and called someone to go and babysit. Based on the information Kim provided, what Ron did when Misty was gone was take his kids work with him so he could take care of them himself.

Misty keeps intimate details about her personal life private, and AS said that even if you "threaten her or do anything to her emotionally or mentally, that will not affect her”. I assume this means when Ron attempted to invade her personal space to obtain information from her regarding her weekend with Nay Nay, she refused to talk and provide him with the information he wanted so Ron turned the tables on her and retaliated by creating a scenario where she doesn’t know what happened to HaLeigh and she can’t talk because Ron is withholding information from her. Because Misty doesn’t know what happened because Ron placed her in a situation where she can’t talk, she is royally screwed for life. Kim Picazio said “This is a guy who even withheld from Misty on the day after his child is missing, he is on his knees crying with HaLeigh’s photo to the cameras, yet he turns around and smirks at Misty and is asking her if she has something to tell him with regard to her fantastic weekend. He was actually more concerned about putting the screws to his girlfriend that she had been sleeping around that weekend with a Gregory Page, than his missing child! That was what he was worried about.”

When LE interviewed Ron after his daughter disappeared, he refused to talk and he hired a Criminal Defense Attorney so he is IMO responsible for HaLeigh’s disappearance. Ron refused to go after Jo when he was given several opportunities to do so, or Tommy who lived around the corner. Ron’s intent was to get back at Misty for withholding information from him which he felt entitled to.

Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Show Transcripts and Show Videos - NO DISCUSSION!

http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/...gs_vanished_ronald_and_misty_lost_their_way_l

bbm

That's a disturbing thought - among many disturbing thoughts. If he left them in the car, how best to keep them asleep the whole time?

That scenario has dosing written all over it, imo.

moo

 

[1Chump]

Here is my :twocents:

Redacted parts.....

Misty keeps intimate details about her personal life private, and AS said that even if you "threaten her or do anything to her emotionally or mentally, that will not affect her”.

That statement has always sounded strange to me. The only way to know if threatening someone emotionally or mentally does not work is if you have done just that. So why would anyone especially GGma Sykes make that statement? I finally got it.

IMO, this is another example of AS covering for her Grandson, and possibly herself, by coming up with a "story" to protect him. GGma Sykes has read and/or heard the talk about Misty being manipulated and/or threatened by Ronald and/or others.

Just like when people started questioning if Haleigh was injured before Ron left for work. GGma Sykes jcame out with her story about her 7 pm trip to the MH to place Misty there with a living Haleigh while Ronald was at work.

IMO, whenever something gets too close to the truth, GGma Sykes speaks. I think GGma Sykes statements may be the key.

Remember this statement:

"He was asleep. I got there 10 minutes after we noticed she was gone. I had Junior, he said he didn't know anything...said he was asleep," Haleigh's great grandmother, Annette Sykes, told First Coast News on Monday.

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/news-article.aspx?storyid=132095

So GGma Sykes has admitted:

Someone threatened Misty emotionally and/or mentally.

GGma Sykes had Junior and Junior was asleep.

10 minutes after GGma Sykes arrived "They noticed Haleigh was gone ."

 

[djdj247]

bbm

That's a disturbing thought - among many disturbing thoughts. If he left them in the car, how best to keep them asleep the whole time?

That scenario has dosing written all over it, imo.

moo

Here is my :twocents:

...regarding her weekend with Nay Nay, she refused to talk and provide him with the information...

.
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Show Transcripts and Show Videos - NO DISCUSSION!

http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/...gs_vanished_ronald_and_misty_lost_their_way_l

BBM. These posts got me thinking about the Nay Nay letter again. I'm fairly new here so if this is being discussed elsewhere please show me the way.

http://imgsrv.thesky973.com/image/wsky/UserFiles/File/Picture%20letter.jpg

I'm curious to see what you all think. In light of the recent stories put forth by MC and ToC, the "black bag" is mentioned. Do you find it odd that a "black bag" is also mentioned in Nay Nay's letter? It seems that this black bag is a common thread.

Also, I find it interesting that Nay Nay refers to Haleigh's disappearance as a "homicide investigation" back in Sept. 2009... when LE did not refer to it as such until April of this year. Did she know then that Haleigh was deceased? Has this been explained? Did LE know back then? What do you think?

Again, if this is being discussed elsewhere let me know. :waitasec:

 

[krkrjx]

BBM. These posts got me thinking about the Nay Nay letter again. I'm fairly new here so if this is being discussed elsewhere please show me the way.

http://imgsrv.thesky973.com/image/wsky/UserFiles/File/Picture%20letter.jpg

I'm curious to see what you all think. In light of the recent stories put forth by MC and ToC, the "black bag" is mentioned. Do you find it odd that a "black bag" is also mentioned in Nay Nay's letter? It seems that this black bag is a common thread.

Also, I find it interesting that Nay Nay refers to Haleigh's disappearance as a "homicide investigation" back in Sept. 2009... when LE did not refer to it as such until April of this year. Did she know then that Haleigh was deceased? Has this been explained? Did LE know back then? What do you think?

Again, if this is being discussed elsewhere let me know. :waitasec:

I thought it interesting when NayNay's letter came out that she referred to a homicide investigation since at that time it was still a missing person case.

I have not heard that Tommy mentioned a black bag, ever. Did I just miss this? IIRC, even Werter stated he didn't know about a black bag but thought maybe it could have been a black blanket. Maybe because Tommy had said Haleigh was wrapped in a blanket?

I like black and have many black items in my home and in my wardrobe--but I do not own a black blanket. Not saying people do not have them, but black blankets usually are not commonplace in homes, IMO.

I do think, however, that if we hear another statement from Tommy he will mention a black bag for one reason, and one reason only: Their stories have to match! JMO.

 

[dodie20]

Here is my :twocents:

According to Kim Picazio, the security guard at PDM Bridge knows Ron had his kids with him at work on two occasions and he saw Ron come out to the car several times during his shift. Because we know Ron was on the evening shift and the only time we are aware of when Misty left Ron was on Feb 4th 2009, IMO it is reasonable to surmise the two evenings Ron took his kids to work with him was during Misty's absence based on the facts we have available to us.

When Ron was left without a babysitter, there is no evidence suggesting he locked them in the trailer and called someone to go and babysit. Based on the information Kim provided, what Ron did when Misty was gone was take his kids work with him so he could take care of them himself.

Misty keeps intimate details about her personal life private, and AS said that even if you "threaten her or do anything to her emotionally or mentally, that will not affect her”. I assume this means when Ron attempted to invade her personal space to obtain information from her regarding her weekend with Nay Nay, she refused to talk and provide him with the information he wanted so Ron turned the tables on her and retaliated by creating a scenario where she doesn’t know what happened to HaLeigh and she can’t talk because Ron is withholding information from her. Because Misty doesn’t know what happened because Ron placed her in a situation where she can’t talk, she is royally screwed for life. Kim Picazio said “This is a guy who even withheld from Misty on the day after his child is missing, he is on his knees crying with HaLeigh’s photo to the cameras, yet he turns around and smirks at Misty and is asking her if she has something to tell him with regard to her fantastic weekend. He was actually more concerned about putting the screws to his girlfriend that she had been sleeping around that weekend with a Gregory Page, than his missing child! That was what he was worried about.”

When LE interviewed Ron after his daughter disappeared, he refused to talk and he hired a Criminal Defense Attorney so he is IMO responsible for HaLeigh’s disappearance. Ron refused to go after Jo when he was given several opportunities to do so, or Tommy who lived around the corner. Ron’s intent was to get back at Misty for withholding information from him which he felt entitled to.

Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Show Transcripts and Show Videos - NO DISCUSSION!

http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/...gs_vanished_ronald_and_misty_lost_their_way_l

Parents do use their kids to hurt others...& that includes killing them. I happens quite often, actually. But would Ron have gone gone after Haleigh, to get back at Misty? who had known her for just months. I have thought that maybe when Ron got home, he found Misty gone, so to show her what happens to w****s, he did something to Haleigh. I know people lash out at the innocent, & they self punish...could that be possible with Ron? He was so angry with Misty, that he punished Haleigh & himself, to show Misty how much pain she'd caused? IDK, but at this point, I'd believe just about anything. A lot of people think that Ron didn't really care for Misty, but I think he did, & can imagine the pain & turmoil in that house.

 

[lonetraveler]

Absolutely. and also..... If your not guilty why would you even think that LE has bugged your home? What gave them that idea? IMO, they knew LE wasn't buying the story that they were selling, including Ron. Add that to, Ron stop cooperating and hired a Criminal Defense Attorney......imo, LE has never believed that Ron was innocent in all this and they made that perfectly clear to him. And because of that Ron thought they would bug his home, car, phones, etc....That's probably why a few of the Cummings felt the need to buy new cars after Haleigh disappeared...If it was known that Ron drove their cars too, maybe they all thought their cars would be bugged.....IDK...just throwing that out there.

JMO

Great post! Makes a lot of sense and would definitely explain the musical cars situation following Haleigh's demise.

 

[dodie20]

I thought it interesting when NayNay's letter came out that she referred to a homicide investigation since at that time it was still a missing person case.

I have not heard that Tommy mentioned a black bag, ever. Did I just miss this? IIRC, even Werter stated he didn't know about a black bag but thought maybe it could have been a black blanket. Maybe because Tommy had said Haleigh was wrapped in a blanket?

I like black and have many black items in my home and in my wardrobe--but I do not own a black blanket. Not saying people do not have them, but black blankets usually are not commonplace in homes, IMO.

I do think, however, that if we hear another statement from Tommy he will mention a black bag for one reason, and one reason only: Their stories have to match! JMO.

when I met my husband, he owned a black comforter, but you're right. Black blankets are not commonplace.

 

[1Chump]

BBM. These posts got me thinking about the Nay Nay letter again. I'm fairly new here so if this is being discussed elsewhere please show me the way.

http://imgsrv.thesky973.com/image/wsky/UserFiles/File/Picture%20letter.jpg

I'm curious to see what you all think. In light of the recent stories put forth by MC and ToC, the "black bag" is mentioned. Do you find it odd that a "black bag" is also mentioned in Nay Nay's letter? It seems that this black bag is a common thread.
Also, I find it interesting that Nay Nay refers to Haleigh's disappearance as a "homicide investigation" back in Sept. 2009... when LE did not refer to it as such until April of this year. Did she know then that Haleigh was deceased? Has this been explained? Did LE know back then? What do you think?

Again, if this is being discussed elsewhere let me know. :waitasec:

Nay Nay's letter say the "detectives told her." So she was not writing what she knows or thought happened but what the detectives told her. I think the detectives lied to Nay Nay to try to get a reaction/statement. The letter says "detectives told her" that there was a written statement, not "showed" her the written statement. Nay Nay believed what they told her was true. Nay Nay has repeated what detectives told her.

Since Misty and Tommy did not mention the "black bag" until after that, I think they may have got the black bag from the detectives also. Either directly from LE or from Nay Nay who got it from detectives.

Just like Tommy's statement when he was in custody that he went to the MH at 10 pm and Misty was not home. Tommy's attorney has since said that Tommy was not there at the time. I think detectives told Tommy that they have a "statement" by someone that Tommy was at the MH at 10 pm. Tommy wanted out of jail so told them what they wanted to hear.

Most people do not realize that LE is legally allowed to lie about anything including evidence and/or witness statements The "theory" is that an innocent person will not admit to a lie. If LE says they have a witness who will testify that they saw the person at the MH at 10 pm, an innocent person knows that they were not there so never would admit they were. However, many times, the innocent person knows that they were not there but believes LE has to tell the truth so they do have someone willing to testify that they were there. They think I'm going to jail for something I did not do. So then they try to come up with a reasonably explanation for the "we know you were there just admit it." LE knows they were lying and just got the person to change their story to fit the lie. So now they think the person is lying when it was really a scared person trying to explain away someone else's lie.

IMO, in this case, LE told too many lies. The reason there are so many "stories" is that every time LE said we know or we have evidence, people believed the lies and repeated those lies. Now when someone tells a story, they think about what they "know" either directly from LE or from others repeating what LE told them. They then incorporate the LE lies into their stories to get LE to believe them.

 

[lonetraveler]

bbm

That's a disturbing thought - among many disturbing thoughts. If he left them in the car, how best to keep them asleep the whole time?

That scenario has dosing written all over it, imo.

moo

Yep and maybe Haleigh's blanket was actually peed on in the car and not while on her bed. Maybe Haleigh died in the car after being drugged to stay quiet and to sleep while her father was "at werk".

 

[dodie20]

Nay Nay's letter say the "detectives told her." So she was not writing what she knows or thought happened but what the detectives told her. I think the detectives lied to Nay Nay to try to get a reaction/statement. The letter says "detectives told her" that there was a written statement, not "showed" her the written statement. Nay Nay believed what they told her was true. Nay Nay has repeated what detectives told her.

Since Misty and Tommy did not mention the "black bag" until after that, I think they may have got the black bag from the detectives also. Either directly from LE or from Nay Nay who got it from detectives.

Just like Tommy's statement when he was in custody that he went to the MH at 10 pm and Misty was not home. Tommy's attorney has since said that Tommy was not there at the time. I think detectives told Tommy that they have a "statement" by someone that Tommy was at the MH at 10 pm. Tommy wanted out of jail so told them what they wanted to hear.

Most people do not realize that LE is legally allowed to lie about anything including evidence and/or witness statements The "theory" is that an innocent person will not admit to a lie. If LE says they have a witness who will testify that they saw the person at the MH at 10 pm, an innocent person knows that they were not there so never would admit they were. However, many times, the innocent person knows that they were not there but believes LE has to tell the truth so they do have someone willing to testify that they were there. They think I'm going to jail for something I did not do. So then they try to come up with a reasonably explanation for the "we know you were there just admit it." LE knows they were lying and just got the person to change their story to fit the lie. So now they think the person is lying when it was really a scared person trying to explain away someone else's lie.

IMO, in this case, LE told too many lies. The reason there are so many "stories" is that every time LE said we know or we have evidence, people believed the lies and repeated those lies. Now when someone tells a story, they think about what they "know" either directly from LE or from others repeating what LE told them. They then incorporate the LE lies into their stories to get LE to believe them.

you're right, & I also think this LE's lies have made a bad situation worse. I wonder if they even had a reason to say that Misty wasn't home, or if they were going on a hunch. Because if they made that carp up, then they gave Misty & this case a royal s******g.

 

[lonetraveler]

They moved that quickly??????...Like within a day/few days after Feb 9th??? I was unaware of that fact....YIKES!!!!....

That is a great point....I would like to know more information about that myself...

I live out of state and know of no one to ask that lives there locally..

But we definately...need more information..on this......!!!!!!!!!!

Yep, I wish we had a local who could also check to see if anyone is living there now. I really hope that LE investigated that home.

 

[suspicious1]

BBM. These posts got me thinking about the Nay Nay letter again. I'm fairly new here so if this is being discussed elsewhere please show me the way.

http://imgsrv.thesky973.com/image/wsky/UserFiles/File/Picture%20letter.jpg

I'm curious to see what you all think. In light of the recent stories put forth by MC and ToC, the "black bag" is mentioned. Do you find it odd that a "black bag" is also mentioned in Nay Nay's letter? It seems that this black bag is a common thread.

Also, I find it interesting that Nay Nay refers to Haleigh's disappearance as a "homicide investigation" back in Sept. 2009... when LE did not refer to it as such until April of this year. Did she know then that Haleigh was deceased? Has this been explained? Did LE know back then? What do you think?

Again, if this is being discussed elsewhere let me know. :waitasec:

Dj, I totally forgot about Nay Nay's letters. In one of her letters, we were trying to make out what looked like something that was erased. There was mention of a fight. Now with this letter she does claim that LE had considered this case a homocide investigation, so now I'm wondering if LE had information or evidence that Haleigh was deceased long before the dock search :waitasec:. Was NayNay in the loud vehicle heard by the dumpster? It's been so long, I can't remember where Nay was the night Haleigh disappeared.

 

[suspicious1]

Great post! Makes a lot of sense and would definitely explain the musical cars situation following Haleigh's demise.

Lone, I could not figure out why they,(AS, Teresa, Ron), would get new cars after Haleigh disappeared. It just didn't seem right. At first I thought that maybe, Haleigh had been placed in each of their cars, but now I don't know. I think Teresa and Ron were trying to stay one step ahead of the police.

If my grandchild had "disappeared", why would I buy a new car or get rid of my old car?
The only thing I can think of:
1. After being hurt or killed, my grandchild had been placed in my car at some point.
2. If I knew the facts of a crime surrounding what happened to my grandchild, I thought LE would bug my car or put a tracking device on my car. What if I wanted to visit where my grandchild was laid to rest, but LE didn't know that I knew where my grandchild was?
3. If I knew that LE was onto my son and he frequently drives my car, I would think that they would bug my car or put a tracking device on it to keep up with his whereabouts.
4. My car could be identified as being in the area, when I told LE that I was not there. Maybe someone could identify the car for whatever reasons.IDK

Right now that's all I got. JMO of course

 

[nomoresorrow]

(BBM)

Yep and maybe Haleigh's blanket was actually peed on in the car and not while on her bed. Maybe Haleigh died in the car after being drugged to stay quiet and to sleep while her father was "at werk".

(RE:BBM) I've wondered that myself lone. If so it might help explain Ronald's (albeit, unjustified) anger toward Misty and blaming her for what happened. I can just see (and hear...) Ronald telling her, "B%$#@ if you'd been here watching my kids instead of screwing around with blah-blah-blah, this wouldn't have happened..." It would also help explain TN/Gma Syke's behavior.

 

[justus4all]

Yep and maybe Haleigh's blanket was actually peed on in the car and not while on her bed. Maybe Haleigh died in the car after being drugged to stay quiet and to sleep while her father was "at werk".

Good theory..

I had worked on that theory..(it was my ealier theory.)..but I could not work it into ...with the fact that Ron left for work 45 minutes earlier...

IMO...If true..that would be a loooooong time for Haleigh to be in the car..


Plus the fact there are cameras showing vehicles entering and leaving the work site..

never the less.....a good theory...

 

[1Chump]

Dj, I totally forgot about Nay Nay's letters. In one of her letters, we were trying to make out what looked like something that was erased. There was mention of a fight. Now with this letter she does claim that LE had considered this case a homocide investigation, so now I'm wondering if LE had information or evidence that Haleigh was deceased long before the dock search :waitasec:. Was NayNay in the loud vehicle heard by the dumpster? It's been so long, I can't remember where Nay was the night Haleigh disappeared.

IMO, they knew from early on that it was potentially a homicide investigation. They did not have the proof so held off on classifying it as homicide as a missing child allowed them to have assistance from other agencies. The minute they classified the case as homicide, the missing child response teams would not longer be available to help investigate.

The reason I think they suspected it was homicide is that on March 5, 2009, it was reported that:

"On Wednesday, anyone who had been inside the Cummings' home was asked to give a DNA sample. Police called it a routine part of their investigation."

http://www.cbs12.com/news/haleigh-4715335-cummings-time.html

Wednesday would be March 4, 2009. So a month after Haleigh disappeared, LE requested DNA. DNA is too expensive to be routine. Usually, LE asks for fingerprints to rule out those prints that should be there in the hope they find "strange" prints. They must have had evidence of something fluid and/or blood related to ask for DNA.

IMO, LE only claimed it was a "routine" part of the investigation to get people to voluntarily submit to DNA testing as they did not have enough "evidence" to get a warrant for DNA from anyone who had been inside. So they requested people "volunteer" DNA. I wish we knew if anyone refused to give a voluntary DNA sample.

I also wish we knew what they found that made them want to test "anybody who had been in the Cummings' home" for DNA.

 

[MADJGNLAW]

Was not sure where to post this article. It does not say who/what LE is searching for, but the fact that Ron goes for sentencing in 3 days made me wonder if LE was searching this lake in the Haleigh case. Not that they said they were, just thinking and hoping is all.

Police Search Local Lake
Officials Say Search Part Of Investigation
POSTED: 3:26 pm EDT September 21, 2010
"Snip" http://www.wesh.com/news/25103171/detail.html
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Teams from two local agencies spent Tuesday morning searching underwater and around an Orange County lake.